*puts up shield*
Ok, this is a genuine question, because I'm kind of baffled by how many people on here wish for Dany to die a most painful death and for Jon to be King by series end.
What am I missing? As a ruler, Jon was equally shit. The crux of both of their storylines in ADwD and ASoS is that they both made some pretty bad decisions with very good intentions and neither really thought about the ramifications. Does it really just boil down to the fact that Dany's smashing of the slave trade was on a much larger scale than Jon allowing the wildlings to pass through the Wall and, as a result, the ripples were larger? Or is it because of the destructive potential of her dragons?
Please try not to let this descend into a Dany hate thread.