Houses, Heraldry and their organization
#1
Posted 04 September 2006 - 09:33 AM
On top of that a little on the organisation of Houses. For example, House Tully has a master at arms, a captain of the guards and a steward. When my brother first read it, he didnt know exactly the breakdown of command there, so he was confused as to who did what, and who went to who for orders when the Lord was out on business.
And if possible, but I doubt GRRM would want to stick to this, who's sworn to who and how powerful a house (in means of swords) are they.
I know most of this stuff is covered on the boards and elsewhere on the internet, but it would be nice to have in a concrete form, with some personal touches from the people who gave us the heraldry and the Houses.
#2 Guest_Other-in-law_*
Posted 04 September 2006 - 12:59 PM
The Pale Griffin, on Sep 4 2006, 10.33, said:
I wholeheartedly second that. We do have some very scant info on a few cases of subinfeudation; Houses Hightower, Royce, Frey, and one of the Houses Vance, but it seems very probable that there are a great many more.
#3
Posted 04 September 2006 - 05:28 PM
#4
Posted 04 September 2006 - 06:20 PM
The Pale Griffin, on Sep 4 2006, 09.33, said:
There are no rules of heraldry in AGOT, as far as we know. There certainly doesn't seem to be any kind of enforcing body to them.
Quote
Well, I would doubt there's anything like a chain of command, or a delegation of responsibilities that applies to more than one family/household. In other words, there wouldn't be any formal system.
Quote
The thing is, there isn't that much that is all that concrete. Perhaps that is more natural to history, but more difficult to those of us used to a modern world where everybody fits in their place.
#5
Posted 04 September 2006 - 07:36 PM
#6
Posted 04 September 2006 - 08:21 PM
#7
Posted 04 September 2006 - 08:36 PM
The difficult bit is getting the info of who is sworn to who down through the various chains of vassalage. George has probably not decided all this, which means that it will be extra work for him to decide it for this book, and he may not have time for it (or even the will -- he wants to keep his options open in some areas, and this might be one of them).
#8
Posted 04 September 2006 - 08:52 PM
Ran, on Sep 4 2006, 21.36, said:
The difficult bit is getting the info of who is sworn to who down through the various chains of vassalage. George has probably not decided all this, which means that it will be extra work for him to decide it for this book, and he may not have time for it (or even the will -- he wants to keep his options open in some areas, and this might be one of them).
Yeah, I can totally dig this explanation. In any case, I am so freakin' excited by this book!
#9
Posted 05 September 2006 - 04:07 AM
#10 Guest_Other-in-law_*
Posted 05 September 2006 - 07:41 AM
I don't think you understood what PG and I meant. Not all of the lesser houses of the Great Lords are tenants in chief sworn directly to them; for example Houses Costayne, Bulwer, Mullendore, Beesbury, and Cuy are all vassals of Lord Hightower, not of the Tyrells directly. Presumably there is quite a bit more of this elsewhere that has not yet been elaborated yet.
Another thing that I would enjoy would be maps that give an idea of the territorial extent of the lesser houses' holdings. Of course, GRRM has not doubt exhaustively worked all of that out, but even some samples would be nice...say a map of the Connington or Darry lands before and after their respective falls from grace after Robert's Rebellion.
In anticipation of anyone objecting that "they didn't have borders in medieval times!", I preemptively answer: poppycock! They didn't have detailed maps delineating boundaries, true, but cartulary evidence is full of perambulation landmarks that enable us to reconstruct the extent of many lordships today. Indeed, we get a brief taste of that in tSS, when Egg reads the charter revealing that the Osgreys no longer hold their Chequy Water. That would be a nice touch, too ...a fascimile of a Westerosi Charter, with the flourishes and stylings of courtly language, eventually getting down to the nitty gritty of just how far some lords property extends to. :)
#11
Posted 05 September 2006 - 07:46 AM
However, we will keep it in mind. Perhaps GRRM is already thinking of doing something of the sort.
#12 Guest_Other-in-law_*
Posted 05 September 2006 - 07:54 AM
#13
Posted 05 September 2006 - 08:05 AM
Like just before some mayor shift of power, like the andal invasion, just before roberts rebellion, or just before the war of the war of the five kings.
And to keep it of general interest and not just for hardcore fans, it could only be the very biggest houses.
I guess the Darrys and the Conningtons could fall into this category of mayor houses just before Roberts rebellion.
#14
Posted 06 September 2006 - 09:36 PM
#15
Posted 07 September 2006 - 09:31 AM
#16
Posted 07 September 2006 - 01:16 PM
The Pale Griffin, on Sep 4 2006, 10.33, said:
Is that really that hard to figure out i always thought they were quite well established?? The Steward is in charge of governance and other such tasks, the Captain of the Guards is just that he's in charge of the castle defenses, and the Master-at-Arms is in charge of training the troops/lordlings, and in the event the Lord is out he names a Castellan who is in command durring his absence or if he's not of an age to rule.
Anyways, on this subject of heraldry I' like to see if we could get the hiarchy of the Lords a little better established and locations of know houses such as Payne, Moore and Paege. And possibly some more house words. I know this is probably too much to hope for since i doubt GRRMs worked out alot of this yet
Edited by cybroleach, 07 September 2006 - 01:18 PM.
#17
Posted 22 January 2007 - 03:29 PM
#18
Posted 22 January 2007 - 07:39 PM
Angalin, on Jan 22 2007, 16.29, said:
This could be yet another of the "References and homages" that have been found in the books. Can you tell me where it is in the comic? I quickly flicked through the short story but could not find it.
Aratan
#19
Posted 23 January 2007 - 11:09 AM
Hmm, didn't Mike Miller do those? Maybe he knows the story behind it.
#20
Posted 23 January 2007 - 01:56 PM
Angalin, on Jan 23 2007, 12.09, said:
Hmm, didn't Mike Miller do those? Maybe he knows the story behind it.
OK, I'll dig out my copies of the comic and have a look - I think my edition did not have that min-heraldry section, but I may be wrong.
Aratan







