Jump to content

How safe is HighGarden?


Recommended Posts

It seems no matter where you go in Westeros, there is plenty of danger and a good chance of getting killed.



Except it seems for Highgarden. From what has been described, it sounds like a prettier, more luxurious Winterfell, a place governed and inhabited largely by good kind hearted people, and with plenty of delicious food and festivities to make it worth while.



It could be well protected from most things, and although the IronBorn close at hand, it is well garrisoned and I don't anticipate any problems on that front.



How safe would it be? If I were transported to Westeros HG would be first place I go because of how... fortified it seems.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well we'll be seeing Highgarden in book 6. So that means it is very much not safe.

Book 6 or later. Could be a POV on dragonback; those could range everywhere and Casterly Rock is the only castle that seems to be fire resistant to a high degree.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems to have such high walls though.

It almost reminds me of Constaninople for most of middle ages... just a nice pretty place for people to have fun and not care while so much went to pot outside their walls.

Lol. Constantinople turned out not to be so safe. :drunk:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Old Town has the history and the trade significance of Constantinople. Highgarden has the chivalry and pomp of Paris. It seems about right.



And the Reach generally is very France-like, with large tracts of fertile land, and a high population. Even the Fleur de lis is reminiscient of Tyrell's sigil.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems to have such high walls though.

It almost reminds me of Constaninople for most of middle ages... just a nice pretty place for people to have fun and not care while so much went to pot outside their walls.

dunno if they are high but the 3 tiered wall system is impressive (constantinople was pretty much one of the premier defensive structures of all time) overall highgarden is described as being more of a luxury place than a defensive structure (although it could be both i suppose)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd have to reread the TWoIaF section (I don't have it digitally yet to search...), but aren't we told that the only time Highgarden was even successfully taken was during the civil war over the succession of Garth X, where each side accused the other of letting the Dornish in to sack it? Any castle that's never been properly taken in its entire history seems a bit due. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It looks about as secure as Winterfell. Strong houses have strong castles, it's a prestige thing. You can bet the Gardenners and then Tyrells wouldn't have been slack about their defenses. Mind, its greatest strength seems to be its position as a heart of the high arts, chivalry, and such. It's a good seat of governance, much like how Winterfell isn't just valuable as a fortification, but as a source of heat through the springs during winter. Large castle, triple wall system, has a nifty hedge maze which is thematically appropriate and pretty cool, it appears to be based on a hill, which is good geography for defense, and the architecture seems pretty advanced as well.



Although its bordered by rivers, which gives the Ironborn access, the castle would need to be commanded by an idiot on par with, or greater than, Rodrik Cassel to fall to the Greyjoys. We're talking plot-heavy incompetence.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

At the moment, it's not very safe.



The Knight of Flowers put a hand upon his sister's shoulder. "If it please Your Grace, from those rocks the ironmen threaten Oldtown and the Arbor. From strongholds on the Shields, raiders can sail up the Mander into the very heart of the Reach, as they did of old. With enough men they might even threaten Highgarden."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...