Jump to content

Why did Eddard risk the lives of Lords at the ToJ?


Getright

Recommended Posts

Why did Eddard risk the lives of Lords and not some of his best fighters at the Tower of Joy?

Maybe those Lords were good fighters, but they are the commanders of his army, he risked so many alliances and commanding skill.

Lady Dustin never wanted to support him in another war after Lord Dustin died. Surely he had better fighting skill of normal Men/ Master at arms within his ranks that could have possibly taken on the Kings Guard if he had say 20 good men?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly. The ToJ wasn't a strategic mission with anything on the line as far as the Rebellion went.

But what happens after his commanders are dead? He risked fighting future wars without these friends and commanders...

He could have stormed the Tower with more men, Kingsguard don't tend to surrender but put 3 against 20 you're bound to surrender, it's hopless for them, no matter how good they are they can't take 20 decent fighters. Lyannas life could have been spared, hers for theirs with no bloodshed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This. Those were the people he trusted.

That said the award for the worst luck ever goes to Ethan Glover. He was able survive both the Mad King and the war and he was killed after the war was ended.

Still though. He was taking an awful risk by having them there. What if most of them survived or even 2-3 others than Howland Reed? Could he trust all of them to keep the secret of R+ L= J?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

actually, there is CONSIDERABLE more evidence that he "trusted" and respected the 3KG over any of his companions, other than Reed.

Is there a chance Howland and Eddard executed the rest of their surviving companions for the 'greater good'?

CONSPIRACY!!! It is known! Lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if there is evidence proving he "trusted" anyone other than Reed, please post.

i do not think someone who made comments about your new wife's breasts on your wedding day is someone you would become BFFs with...

In a society were people have a bedding ceremony it's not a reprehensible comment.

Still though. He was taking an awful risk by having them there. What if most of them survived or even 2-3 others than Howland Reed? Could he trust all of them to keep the secret of R+ L= J?

I don't think that he knew that J was there. I believe that he trusted his closest Northern Lords.

actually, there is CONSIDERABLE more evidence that he "trusted" and respected the 3KG over any of his companions, other than Reed.

Trusted no respected yes. But like many other things he was wrong.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there a chance Howland and Eddard executed the rest of their surviving companions for the 'greater good'?

CONSPIRACY!!! I is known! Lol

Lord Dustin, Blood of the Barrow Kings; and Lord Glover, Blood of the Kings of the North (First Men kings after the Long Night) were brought there as sacrifices to old gods. Theo Wull, Lord Ryswell, and Cassel just had incredibly bad luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why did Eddard risk the lives of Lords and not some of his best fighters at the Tower of Joy?

Maybe those Lords were good fighters, but they are the commanders of his army, he risked so many alliances and commanding skill.

Lady Dustin never wanted to support him in another war after Lord Dustin died. Surely he had better fighting skill of normal Men/ Master at arms within his ranks that could have possibly taken on the Kings Guard if he had say 20 good men?

B)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We actually only know of Willam Dustin and Howland Reed being lords. We have no idea if Ethan Glover, Theo Wull, Martyn Cassel or Mark Ryswell were.

The Glovers aren't lords but they have the strength similar to a lord.It's like how in the Vale the knight of 9 stars has nearly the same amount of men as the lords declarant.Wull is a mountain clan name iirc so he was probably a lord/Clan Chief.The Russell's are lords.And the Cassels are a house sworn directly to the Starks.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Glovers aren't lords but they have the strength similar to a lord.It's like how in the Vale the knight of 9 stars has nearly the same amount of men as the lords declarant.Wull is a mountain clan name iirc so he was probably a lord/Clan Chief.The Russell's are lords.And the Cassels are a house sworn directly to the Starks.

Ser Mark Ryswell was not the lord. GRRM confirmed that in a SSM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...