[Pre-ADwD Spoilers] Prologue - Spoilers for ADwD
#41
Posted 09 July 2007 - 07:21 AM
I did find it interesting that Haggen uses the specific phrase "all men must die", too. Ancient tie to the FM, or a common source for both beliefs? Or just coincidence? (Is there ever really coincidence in GRRM's writing?)
#42
Posted 09 July 2007 - 07:26 AM
Aoife, on Jul 9 2007, 08.21, said:
I did find it interesting that Haggen uses the specific phrase "all men must die", too. Ancient tie to the FM, or a common source for both beliefs? Or just coincidence? (Is there ever really coincidence in GRRM's writing?)
Well, it's not necessarily a Faceless Man phrase originally, right? Oberyn (I think) refers to it as an old Valyrian saying.
#43
Posted 09 July 2007 - 07:53 AM
Scott A Ellison, on Jul 9 2007, 07.27, said:
I'm still working my way through this to see if there is anything I can add so if someone has already answered I apologize, but...no. I really don't think so. He is so obviously frustrated with this chapter, I can't see him releasing anything unless he decides to get away from it to work on something else for awhile.
We did try to let him know what we felt worked, didn't work, and where we got lost because he did seem in some ways to really want a fresh perspective. I hope we were able to help him some. There are parts of it that were still a little disjointed, but it felt like he was so close to getting it he could almost touch it, if you know what I mean.
As we all agreed at the con, even a crap book from Martin is going to be better than the best of some other writers, but he's going to release nothing until he's happy with it. Bless him!
I wouldn't hold on for another preview just yet.
#44
Posted 09 July 2007 - 08:07 AM
Aoife, on Jul 9 2007, 08.21, said:
I did find it interesting that Haggen uses the specific phrase "all men must die", too. Ancient tie to the FM, or a common source for both beliefs? Or just coincidence? (Is there ever really coincidence in GRRM's writing?)
I don't know about a coincidence here...his reading is almost hypnotic he really puts you in there. That was something I don't think any of us picked up over the weekend. If you keep in mind that when warging you are essentially taking over the intellect of an innocent being, warging into a person to avoid your own death you are essentially killing that other person. I think in this case it just means that you must accept your own death and not warg to live eternally, which he reinforces with the idea that dogs are the easiest because it is like a marriage between the two with both parties accepting the arrangement while the bear hated him and despised having him warg into her and would have killed him had she been given an opportunity. So....taking over another person would be a violent action, like the rape he was talking about, but it would go on the length of the life of that body.
That's really, really nasty when you think about it like that! **Shudders**
Maybe it is a harken back to past events that we don't know about, though. Maybe this had happened before with drastically bad results and so this lives on in legend. I'd be interested to hear other people's thoughts on this. George did mention at one point that part of what he wanted to convey was the legends about skin-changing, there may be more to this than meets the eye initially. Wouldn't be the first time he'd done that to us!
#45
Posted 09 July 2007 - 08:13 AM
:)
Edited by Master Baiter, 09 July 2007 - 08:13 AM.
#46
Posted 09 July 2007 - 08:56 AM
Vhagar, on Jul 9 2007, 07.53, said:
I'm not at all sure whether this is good news or bad. The fact that he's really glad he may have just finished the.. uhh.. prologue.. is sort of disheartening on its face, you know? At the same time, the prologue is disconnected from almost all the other plot threads in the book, so he may have gotten a lot done with the main narrative and gone back to finish up stuff that was bothering him. No real way to tell.
Thank you all for transcribing. That chapter sounds like its going to be a really interesting read.
#47
Posted 09 July 2007 - 09:16 AM
He doesn't work in linear fashion, in any case, so his completing the prologue doesn't mean much of anything regarding the state of the rest of the novel. I suspect the main reason he read it was to see how an audience responded to it, and if it needed any more tweaking (IIRC, on one occasion while reading a Cersei chapter pre-AFfC publication, he stopped for a moment and made some marks with a pencil before continuing on -- revising as he read, as it were)
#48
Posted 09 July 2007 - 09:45 AM
#49
Posted 09 July 2007 - 09:50 AM
#50
Posted 09 July 2007 - 09:58 AM
Also, his MO is to end with an "act break" sort of a dramatic ending to the chapter. He talked of having real difficulty finding the right one with the prologue.
#51
Posted 09 July 2007 - 10:14 AM
The Fat Man, on Jul 9 2007, 08.01, said:
First of all, thanks to all who posted synopses. You are feeding my ASOIAF jones.
I must disagree with TFM here. There really was no dealing with Mance Rayder; he was too arrogant and Stannis would have asked too much (i.e. submission to Baratheon rule). I suspect that if Stannis had merely reinforced the Wall and made it impossible for the wildlings to take it, Mance would either have gone with his boat idea or simply blown the Horn of Joramun (for whatever that's worth). Instead, Stannis used the element of surprise while he had it and achieved a solid victory that put him in a much better position to deal. The wildlings are scattered and demoralized, and in my view far more willing to come to terms than they were when the King Beyond the Wall led them.
As to the increased numbers of wights...well, that's a problem, isn't it? However, I'd rather fight mindless zombies than human beings who can think and plan, particularly when I'm fighting from a near-impenetrable wall more than seven hundred feet high. The wildlings could use tricks and try alternate solutions, whereas the wights will merely hurl themselves heedlessly against the defenses of the Night's Watch. (The Others are a different matter entirely, but there seem to be far fewer of them, and they'd be a problem in any case.) Personally, I like my enemies stupid, and that's what the wights are.
#52
Posted 09 July 2007 - 10:20 AM
Ran, on Jul 9 2007, 10.16, said:
He doesn't work in linear fashion, in any case, so his completing the prologue doesn't mean much of anything regarding the state of the rest of the novel. I suspect the main reason he read it was to see how an audience responded to it, and if it needed any more tweaking (IIRC, on one occasion while reading a Cersei chapter pre-AFfC publication, he stopped for a moment and made some marks with a pencil before continuing on -- revising as he read, as it were)
Yes, this is exactly true. He even mentioned that he was partly choosing to read this chapter because he wanted to read it outlioud again and get a reaction. He did stop and make notes and whatnot. Not significant lapses, but there was definitely scribbling going on. You could tell easily what he liked and what he didn't, sometimes he'd even make pained faces. We tried to offer as much feedback as we could because the poor thing is obviously tortured about this chapter right now.
And yes, just to reiterate, he doesn't work linearly, but tends to get on a particular POV tangent. I think there is a significantly larger part of the book done that this suggests.
#53
Posted 09 July 2007 - 10:25 AM
TrackerNeil, on Jul 9 2007, 09.14, said:
If it was just the wights, there wouldn't be a problem. However, the Others appear to have complete control over them, and they appear to be smart enough to avoid throwing wights at an impenetrable target. After all, they haven't attacked the wall yet. Why would they start now, while it's still standing? From what we've seen, the Others use wights to eliminate living men who happen to be convenient targets, creating more wights. The only thing close to a siege we saw them mount was at the Fist of the First Men, and Mance said that the defenses that the NW had set up would have thwarted him for a while, but were useless against the dead. The Others are smart enough to pick their targets.
#54
Posted 09 July 2007 - 10:45 AM
At the Q & A, I had asked whether there has been any influence by the Seven on the POV characters similar as to the Old Gods on the Stark children; the direwolves, Arya's talk with Ned in Harrenhal's godswood. He asked me back, "well, what do you think?"
I said "yes." He said it was up to the reader to decide but reiterated that the gods would make no appearence.
All of ths came about from previous discussions on a theory (not mine) that the Seven have individual champions. Doing a re-read there have either been subtle hint or just coincidences in the writing to make you wonder. ;) Guesses:
The Mother: Dany
The Father: Davos
The Crone: Catelyn
The Maid: Brienne
The Warrior: Jaime
The Smith: Gendry, Tyrion?
The Stranger: Sandor
After the question, GRRM did talk a bit about religion in his world and the sometime drawbacks to it. He then quoted Tyrion who makes a jape somewhere along his journeys in ADwD about liking fat priests who lounge around, eat sweet meats and diddle little boys. It's the ones who actually BELIEVE in Gods that cause trouble! :lol: ;)
ETA: typos and clarified a point.
Edited by Trebla, 09 July 2007 - 10:49 AM.
#55
Posted 09 July 2007 - 11:22 AM
#56
Posted 09 July 2007 - 11:40 AM
WOW! What an incredible choice of a prologue POV.
I thought things would be bad beyond the Wall in DwD, but the fact that we're seeing just how bad it really is from the very beginning is important. And things are going to get worse.
Edited by Benjen, 09 July 2007 - 11:40 AM.
#57
Posted 09 July 2007 - 11:53 AM
Wow. I was hoping for a beyond-the-wall prologue, but that exceeds my expectations. Great information about skinchaners & warging - it sounds much more complex than I originally envisioned.
Things are really taking a turn for the worse north of the Wall. I don't know how far north the wildings were able to go after the battle (i.e., was this event within a couple days of the Stannis rout?) but it sounds like the better part of the area north of the wall is infested with wights and (presumably) Others. Maybe the possibility of some sort of unified stand against the Wall by the end of ADWD isn't unrealistic.
It sounds like Bran & Co. are wandering around in the midst of all this. I am curious to see just how they are able to avoid being seen or wight-ified.
This "second life" seems to reinforce the fact that what we saw with some of Orell's consciousness bleeding into his eagle upon his death was in fact the norm, and also makes me wonder again about Mormont's raven.
As far as spoiler chapters go, this was by far the best I've read (or, rather, read the synopisis of). After the AFFC wait I refused to get excited about another installment in this series until it's been announced as finished by the Man himself. But damned if this doesn't have me as giddy as a fanboy in anticipation.
#58
Posted 09 July 2007 - 11:55 AM
Crow, on Jul 9 2007, 12.53, said:
We felt him out about this. We got no where.
In fact, he chuckled.
#59
Posted 09 July 2007 - 12:24 PM
Tediz, on Jul 9 2007, 11.25, said:
Well, that just reinforces my point. The wights (as you seem to assert) won't assault the Wall. The wildlings will. That to me makes the wildlings the more immediate threat, and the one Stannis seems to have dealt with, at least for now.
Obviously, even if the wildlings all agree to bend the knee that won't exactly usher in a northern age of security. They'll chafe under King Stannis' rule, cause problems, the northmen won't like it, etc., but sometimes you have to solve problems in pieces. Stannis has solved the piece called Mance Rayder, and now he'll work on solving the piece called Blue-eyed Demons from the Wintry North.
#60
Posted 09 July 2007 - 01:24 PM







