The Knight of the Laughing Tree
#61
Posted 15 May 2008 - 09:19 AM
#62
Posted 15 May 2008 - 09:27 AM
#63
Posted 15 May 2008 - 09:31 AM
Happy Ent, on May 15 2008, 08.17, said:
If Bran can do that, why shouldn't Howland Reed (who spent a winter at the Isle of Faces for crying out loud!) be able to warg into Ser Arthur? Maybe not turn him into a puppet (Arthur isn't Hodor), but just make him miss a parry?
How do we even know he is capable of being a warg? Is there any proof? The Reeds can tell Bran is a warg, but that does not mean that they have the ability in their family at all.
In my opinon he used a net to trip Arthur, and then Ned gave a finishing blow with Ice. But who knows. :unsure:
Edited by Jak o the Shadows, 15 May 2008 - 09:33 AM.
#64
Posted 15 May 2008 - 09:46 AM
Lupigis, on May 15 2008, 15.22, said:
Likewise, Howland using a poisoned arrow would be compatible with the book and shouldn't be discounted.
AHSOIAF said:
neither Jojen nor Meera have warg'd yet.
the ability to warg is considered special; to have the greensight may not be something that can be learned.
Drogo said:
JotS said:
#65
Posted 15 May 2008 - 09:55 AM
Drogo, on May 15 2008, 16.19, said:
Note that uniquely among Ned's loyal bannermen, Howland does not appear when Ned calls his banners. Maybe Howland was "damaged".
#66 Guest_Other-in-law_*
Posted 15 May 2008 - 10:52 AM
Happy Ent, on May 15 2008, 10.55, said:
It's not just a matter of the bannermen themselves, it's their troops. Pregnant Lady Flint didn't go to war with Robb, but she most likely sent some soldiers. Not so with the crannogmen, because they have a very different culture and role to play in the defense of the North than the average feudal host. When Jojen and Meera showed up at Winterfell, Maester Luwin said 'this is most unexpected'.
That's not because they, too, were injured while warging into Arthur Dayne, but simply because they're crannogmen. Howland actively going on campaign with Ned would be the exception rather than the rule, I'd say. An exception brought about entirely by the coincidence that he was present at the great tournament of Harrenhal, and the events that happened there.
Edited by Other-in-law, 15 May 2008 - 10:54 AM.
#67
Posted 15 May 2008 - 12:13 PM
1. There is enough anecdotal evidence to eliminate many, if not all, of the suspects save Lyanna;
2. There is no evidence that eliminates Lyanna.
What others have said:
Quote
Jaime also states that much of jousting is luck. Jorah Mormount says the same thing to Dany, as does Selmy. The idea of mystery Knights entering tournies is a longstanding tradition in Westeroes. All of these ideas blend to make Lyanna’s victories in the lists all the more plausible.
Quote
Quote
This is my “If after this than therefore because of this” argument and I stand by it. Rhaegar and Lyanna HAD to meet at some point. Its well established that the Starks did not go South and the Targs did not leave the South very often. When did he have time to 1) meet Lyanna, 2) be impressed by her, and 3) fall in love? Its possible that he just saw her at harrenhal and that was that. However, he was specifically charged with finding the KotLT and I firmly believe that he DID find her. And it was Lyanna and that was that.
Quote
Again, why would Benjen keep himself a secret? 15 is not that young. I think that Benjen would also have stayed in the lists. But I think there is another reason that points away from Benjen and towards Lyanna.
Quote
And yet HR goes South (an area he has NEVER been to) to search for Lyanna Stark. Why? Maybe it was because Lyanna had ghelped HR so much at harrenhal- not just scattering the squires with a tourney sword, but possibly in actually fighting Howland’s battle on the field.
Again, I think all signs point to Lyanna. I think it’s a matter of uncovering the remaining evidence.
#68
Posted 15 May 2008 - 12:22 PM
Other-in-law, on May 15 2008, 17.52, said:
Good points, I will retract that argument and vow to never use it again.
(Until A Waltz with Wargs finally hits the shelves in 2012, and we'll see Howland the Vegetable and I'll be vindicated!)
#69 Guest_Other-in-law_*
#70
Posted 15 May 2008 - 12:57 PM
Other-in-law, on May 15 2008, 11.52, said:
When Jojen and Meera showed up at Winterfell, Maester Luwin said 'this is most unexpected'.
That's not because they, too, were injured while warging into Arthur Dayne, but simply because they're crannogmen. Howland actively going on campaign with Ned would be the exception rather than the rule, I'd say.
But yet he DID feel it neccesary to send his children, while he himself, a "great friend" of Ned's stays absent. There must be a reason he sent his kids rather than show up himself.
#71
Posted 15 May 2008 - 01:09 PM
back_packn, on May 15 2008, 12.57, said:
When Robb met with Catelyn on his march south, didn't he tell her that the crannogmen were going to stay in and hold the Neck against the enemies?
#72
Posted 15 May 2008 - 01:14 PM
Quote
Wishful thinking. At this rate, 2020 at the earliest.
#73
Posted 15 May 2008 - 01:31 PM
Lady Blackfish, on May 14 2008, 18.15, said:
Ned surviving the Rebellion without Ice doesn't necessarily mean that he was any sort of great swordsman. I imagine plenty of men of varying skills survived regardless. Though it's true that Ned might have been more of a target, much like Robb was specifically targeted by Jaime Lannister in battle, he'd similarly possibly have a guard ensuring his survival. The best man winning happens more in controlled environments like tournaments but I think in war things are so much more chancy and multivariable. So yeah Ned was maybe at least a competent swordsman, but not necessarily anything more. Sansa recalls Bronze Yohn soundly defeating him at swordplay at Winterfell, and of course GRRM has said that Brandon was the swordsman of the family, Ned's forte was strategy.
I agree with everything you said 100%! I don't think Ned was a great swordsman but I do think he was adequate. Having Ice at the ToJ would undoubtedly help (duh!) but I don't really see how he could have had it throughout the Rebellion. So, I guess he pobably only had a regular ol' sword during the Rebellion but he probably didn't see that much active swordplay anyway since he was the commander.
#74
Posted 15 May 2008 - 04:37 PM
Happy Ent, on May 15 2008, 17.55, said:
Note that uniquely among Ned's loyal bannermen, Howland does not appear when Ned calls his banners. Maybe Howland was "damaged".
#75
Posted 15 May 2008 - 05:51 PM
ETA: As to Ice, I suspect Lord Rickard had left it in Winterfell before coming south (for, I believe, Brandon's wedding), and Ned retrieved it when he went North as the Lord of Winterfell.
Edited by Ran, 15 May 2008 - 05:52 PM.
#76
Posted 15 May 2008 - 06:37 PM
Rockroi, on May 15 2008, 09.13, said:
Errr, you're ignoring what I said next. I'll quote from ASOS (pg 342 in the paperback edition): "That night at the great castle, the storm lord and the knight of skulls and kisses each swore they would unmask him, and the king himself urged men to challenge him, declaring that the face behind that helm was no friend of his."
So...would you stay in the lists, and risked unmasking, after the Mad King said this? Sure, he hadn't killed Brandon and Rickard yet, still at this late date I'd bet people would be smart enough not to risk his displeasure.
Nonetheless, this is kinda a stupid argument, because I concede that Lyanna is most likely tKotLT. I just don't like that particular argument in favor.
#77
Posted 15 May 2008 - 09:17 PM
#78
Posted 16 May 2008 - 12:08 AM
Ran, on May 15 2008, 17.51, said:
ETA: As to Ice, I suspect Lord Rickard had left it in Winterfell before coming south (for, I believe, Brandon's wedding), and Ned retrieved it when he went North as the Lord of Winterfell.
Anyway, this all started because I was wondering if Ned had Ice at the ToJ and, no matter how long he had it before that, we can be pretty confident that he did. Thus, I think it would greatly aid Ned's battle with Arthur and perhaps one good blow with Ice was what Howland allowed him by doing whatever he did? :dunno:
#79
Posted 16 May 2008 - 12:08 AM
Lord Varys, on May 11 2008, 17.53, said:
I assume that Howland Reed killed Arthur Dayne by using poison.
First note is interesting. But I still think Howland Reed was the KotKT
Fie. Howland Reed using poison! Can't go there with you on that. I cannot imagine Ned would have a good friend who would use poison on the greatest knight then alive.
#80 Guest_Other-in-law_*
Posted 16 May 2008 - 01:03 AM
Prince of the North, on May 16 2008, 01.08, said:






