Bacigalupi's 'The Windup Girl' - SPOILERS It's totally heechy-keechy.
#1
Posted 25 August 2009 - 09:23 PM
Thoughts? Go!
#5
Posted 26 August 2009 - 07:00 AM
Max the Mostly Mediocre, on Aug 25 2009, 22.51, said:
It's a term that characters use in the book to describe genetically engineered humans, called windups, which have telltale stutter-stop movements 'built' into their makeup.
On the whole, I liked the book a lot. It has some first novel flaws: loose plotlines here and there, undeveloped characters (particularly Anderson, who serves more to move the plot along than as a real human, and Kanya), and some less than sensitive handling of
Hock Seng was another highlight for me, as he may not be a particularly likeable character, but he is certainly interesting and believable.
Gibbons was terribly underused.
This post has been edited by Xray the Enforcer: 27 August 2009 - 09:07 AM
#6
Posted 27 August 2009 - 03:54 AM
Ser Scot A Ellison, on Aug 26 2009, 12.53, said:
Yes, I liked it a lot. As X says above, the worldbuilding was top-notch -- believable, stifling and exotic.
Minor, vague spoilers follow here...
*Yes, I know it's less black and white than that...
**I'm keeping things as vague as possible to avoid spoilers...
This post has been edited by Xray the Enforcer: 27 August 2009 - 09:06 AM
#7
Posted 27 August 2009 - 07:50 AM
Also, who else recognized
the rambutan from the description alone?
#8
Posted 27 August 2009 - 08:18 AM
Xray the Enforcer, on Aug 27 2009, 13.50, said:
Also, who else recognized
the rambutan from the description alone?
I envy those who can discuss such books over their delicious burgers and fries (or whatever ethnic cooking is in the US). I failed to recognise the ngaw, but really wanted to know what it was and to eat one.
#9
Posted 27 August 2009 - 08:36 AM
Peadar, on Aug 27 2009, 09.18, said:
#10
Posted 27 August 2009 - 09:00 AM
Xray the Enforcer, on Aug 27 2009, 08.50, said:
the rambutan from the description alone?
I did.
according to the great font of knowledge that is Wikipedia, the Thai word for rambutan is ngao, leading to me that Bacigalupi's spelling is an intentional representation of how the Westerner Lake hears the word.
Also, I think it's hilarious that we've discussed plot and character points openly, but are spoiling talk of fruit. It makes me feel like making loud declarations.
ALL TALK OF FRUIT ON THIS BOARD SHOULD NOW BE PLACED BEHIND SPOILER TAGS!
#11
Posted 27 August 2009 - 09:11 AM
In any case, I didn't want to ruin the fun for anyone else who might have a knowledge of tropical fruit.
This post has been edited by Xray the Enforcer: 27 August 2009 - 09:13 AM
#13
Posted 27 August 2009 - 09:59 AM
#14
Posted 27 August 2009 - 10:56 AM
Ser Scot A Ellison, on Aug 27 2009, 15.59, said:
I think they got it the same way I did: WorldCon, at the Nightshade table! Hurray! Very appropriate, since "nightshades" are mentioned in the first few pages :)
#15
Posted 27 August 2009 - 10:56 AM
Ser Scot A Ellison, on Aug 27 2009, 10.59, said:
Bought it from the nice people at Night Shade Books at WorldCon (it was the second thing I did at the Con, the first being I picked up my badge), and then turned immediately to our left and heaped praise on the author himself before he signed it.
#16
Posted 27 August 2009 - 12:55 PM
:(
#17
Posted 27 August 2009 - 01:28 PM
This is also, possibly the first time in my board history that I haven't un-highlighted the spoilers out of curiosity.
#18
Posted 27 August 2009 - 01:42 PM
Night Watchman, on Aug 27 2009, 14.28, said:
This is also, possibly the first time in my board history that I haven't un-highlighted the spoilers out of curiosity.
Me too, to both. I loved Pump Six and am really looking forward to seeing what Bacigalupi does in long-form fiction. Publishers Weekly called it one of the finest SF novels of the year, and I have no doubt that's true. Can't wait to read it.
#19
Posted 30 August 2009 - 09:48 PM
I liked that his world had a series of stereo-typed boogey-men, like the yellow cards, the windups, the white shirts and, most terrifying of all, the calorie men (eep!). Sinister indeed and successful at adding depth to his universe. The science-speak also, I thought, helped texture B.'s world, since it was very 'techno-babble' in the sense that if you say H1N1 to most everyone these days, they know what you mean, but H1N1 would be entirely incomprehensible to someone without access to the media. On the other hand, I didn't understand half of the sciency-techno-talk, which was fine, since half the time I don't understand it in the news anyway. Just like real life!
I also liked that the setting was not in the United States. I may be a bit biased because my sister-in-law is Thai, but I loved that everything took place in Bangkok.
And I loved the ending. Not the bit about
I think the other comments about characters such as Lake were pretty spot on. One problem I did have was with the dialogue, in that everyone talked the same and used the same sort of language. The dialogue felt too much like the narrator to me. But it was only a minor stylistic issue and in general I really enjoyed the book. I've never read Bacigalupi's other work, but I will definitely do so now.
And I too got my copy at WorldCon. That dude from Nightshade always manages to sell me shit whether I have money or not, and this time was no exception. The cover was so pretty anyways that I wanted it immediately.
#20
Posted 08 September 2009 - 03:29 AM
As an aside, the reference to Lalji was a nice connection too.
That said, I did sympathise with the characters, including him. He wasn't an easy character to like, and yet I found myself wanting him to get through. In fact I had that delicious experience of often seeing two characters whose aims were in conflict, and wanting them both to succeed, but knowing they couldn't.
I'm not sure I agree completely with
All that said, I got no sense of sadness when he died, as I did with Jaidee.
The setting is the main strength, I agree. It works, it's fascinating and it's much more deeply and richly portrayed than was possible within the short stories. The plot was also developed well. I thought he showed he could handle many different types of scene deftly, again something that is tricky in a short story. I especially liked
About the ending: I don't agree that came out of nowhere, exactly. Earlier in the book, there are a couple of times when
For a first novel, it's incredibly good. Heck, by any standards it's incredibly good. One of the best books I've read this year, on the level of Dan Abraham for sure.

Help
Bookmark
Del.icio.us
Digg
Email
Facebook
Google
Mixx
Reddit
StumbleUpon











