South Park
#5
Posted 18 March 2010 - 02:49 PM
palin99999, on 17 March 2010 - 11:51 PM, said:
I felt the exact opposite of you. The message makes the product.
And nothing needs to be hammered into the collective conscious more than Tiger Woods is none of their fucking concern, and it's perfectly natural.
#6
Posted 18 March 2010 - 04:20 PM
Stego, on 18 March 2010 - 02:49 PM, said:
And nothing needs to be hammered into the collective conscious more than Tiger Woods is none of their fucking concern, and it's perfectly natural.
This
Although the episode was funny, they've done better though. I was slightly underwhelmed. Maybe I got too hyped up about a new season
Loved the south park logic though. "Independence hall... Independence day.... Aliens!"
#8
Posted 18 March 2010 - 07:47 PM
#10
Posted 18 March 2010 - 09:00 PM
#15
Posted 25 March 2010 - 03:19 AM
Marwyn, on 18 March 2010 - 04:20 PM, said:
Edited by Brude, 25 March 2010 - 03:37 AM.
#16
Posted 25 March 2010 - 09:40 AM
Brude, on 25 March 2010 - 03:19 AM, said:
Yeah, it's like the Wookie Defense or the business plan of the Underpants Gnomes, but too often that seems to be the kind of "logic" people use these days in their arguments about things, or how Wall Street runs the world financial systems...just like the Underpants Gnomes.
or like the one where they try to return the small appliance to Sur Le Table, only to find it's now owned by the government who then determines it's worth TEN MILLION DOLLARS.
#17
Posted 25 March 2010 - 02:18 PM
ztemhead, on 25 March 2010 - 09:40 AM, said:
Correction: it was actually worth 90 billion, according to the Treasury Dept's infallible value-placement system
#18
Posted 25 March 2010 - 03:20 PM
WrathOfMe, on 25 March 2010 - 01:16 AM, said:
Well, the episode did have a message. But it was a bit less obvious than the first one, I guess. It was funny, but a bit too much vomiting for my taste. Really I dont need to see that for 20 minutes.
I hope we get some more episodes with a lot of Cartman, though. Those are always the best. The first one barely had the kids at all, and this one featured a lot more of butters. Without Cartman the show wouldnt have been half as good.
#19
Posted 25 March 2010 - 03:27 PM
WrathOfMe, on 25 March 2010 - 02:18 PM, said:
yeah, I didn't remember the actual figure.
About this week's episode, they do bring up an interesting point, Catcher in the Rye really didn't have any deeper meaning that I can figure out, though just like the kids in South Park, I've heard everyone since high school try to ascribe it one. It's something I've known for a while, since I've read the book perhaps a dozen times, but never actually put into words until just now.






