And I sure wouldn't want to be the one to lift a dragon's tail to check.
Dragon stuff
#41
Posted 24 October 2011 - 09:29 AM
And I sure wouldn't want to be the one to lift a dragon's tail to check.
#42
Posted 27 October 2011 - 01:23 PM
Lyvyathan, on 18 October 2011 - 09:38 PM, said:
"F-this Aegom, I'm sick of you riding my back and getting me to fly around, who the heck are ya to tell me what to do? I want to go eat some cows now" - and promptly throws him to the ground.
"A bond" would necessarily mean some form of warging imho - at least in relation to said dragon.
You can have belief in destiny all you want - but does the freaking monster of a Dragon know it or even care?
Mayhaps you might bring up Killer-whales... yeah, then maybe ...
This is purely mindless speculation.
I'll stop before this goes off-topic, but I think it's important to understand the connection between riders and dragons. If only we knew more about Valyria....
*edited to hide spoilers*
Edited by Lady Lars, 27 October 2011 - 01:27 PM.
#43
Posted 27 October 2011 - 02:03 PM
#44
Posted 27 October 2011 - 06:51 PM
Lady Lars, on 27 October 2011 - 01:23 PM, said:
Why do you call it purely mindless speculation? I cast a realistic scenario based on what we know. The whole idea of warging came from GRRM. Is it no surprise that all of the Stark children have some special bond and relationship with their direwolves to the extent of being able to see what they are seeing?
Stark blood = bond with wolves etc.
Targaryen blood = bond with dragon
Edited by Lyvyathan, 30 October 2011 - 06:11 PM.
#45
Posted 29 October 2011 - 09:58 AM
Lord Varys, on 27 September 2010 - 01:14 AM, said:
So what did the Targaryens do with their dragons during peace time (and the times were peaceful during the 70 years of Jaehaerys and Viserys)? Of course, there should/could have been some kind of tourney involving dragons. Such things could have been really fun, especially as huge spectacles which showed the whole Realm splendor and power of their ruling dynasty. Unfortunately no one ever talked about them. At least until now. One should really dig into the possibility of such things ;-).
And then we also want a dragon family tree. It started with Aegon's dragons, and only went on for six generations (if we count Aegon's III generation a generation were dragons were born), so in total it's unlikely that there were more then 20 grown Targaryen dragons.
It seems that Dragons were much more used in old Valyria, and thus they were able to grow and prosper, when Targaryens moved to Westeros, they used their Dragons to conquer the lands, giving them opportunity to fly, fight and feed. However, once all of Westeros is subdued, their Dragons no longer served their purpose in war. So my guess is that in the time of peace Dragons were held in dragons pit under the Red Tower. And by doing so they started to devolve.
It's nineteen, and you could find the names and timeline fore some of them in the books - but what's the point, Dany's Dragons are not related to the old line of Targaryen Dragon's.
#46
Posted 29 October 2011 - 10:01 AM
Lyvyathan, on 27 October 2011 - 06:51 PM, said:
I agree, warging has crucial role to the plot. Imagine this - my guess is that Jon Snow is half Stark-half Targaryen - Stark blood allows him to worg his wolf, and Targaryen to become second head of the Dragon.
#47
Posted 29 October 2011 - 10:34 PM
Pomp & Happenstance, on 27 October 2011 - 02:03 PM, said:
But in ADWD -
#48
Posted 29 October 2011 - 10:40 PM
NenadBulaja, on 29 October 2011 - 09:58 AM, said:
It's nineteen, and you could find the names and timeline fore some of them in the books - but what's the point, Dany's Dragons are not related to the old line of Targaryen Dragon's.
I don't think the demise of dragons had much to do with their zoo - but more to do with the end of the season of magic.
My theory is that "Its time (for magic to happen)". The rise of Dany's dragon coincided with the rise of other mythical creatures, The Others, the sea monster Krakens from the sea, the appearance of Direwolves south of the Wall etc..
#49
Posted 30 October 2011 - 10:49 AM
Lyvyathan, on 29 October 2011 - 10:40 PM, said:
My theory is that "Its time (for magic to happen)". The rise of Dany's dragon coincided with the rise of other mythical creatures, The Others, the sea monster Krakens from the sea, the appearance of Direwolves south of the Wall etc..
I partially agree, Dragons are fierce creatures, described as Fire and Wind brought together, and even raider who is meant to ride the Dragon can not do so lightly, also Dragons feeding habits are problematic (they would eat any kind of meat, and in great quantities). So my guess is that after Targaryens no longer needed Dragons to subdue, or control the realm they decided to put their Dragons in controlled space for kinda "easier maintenance". However, living and breading in such environment must have been hard for animals meant for flying and hunting, so their offspring's got smaller and weaker.
So my theory goes like this, with dying out of Dragons, the Others grown stronger, and with the coming of the long winter decided to strike at the realms of Man again. Magic in the realms was weaker only in part related to fire and blood - the kind most useful against the Others. So Dragons are connected with THAT part of magic. So their appearance is connected to it, not coincidental.
By the way, Dire wolves are just larger sort of wolves, and Kraken is giant squid, mythical only because long time passed without seeing one.
#50
Posted 30 October 2011 - 06:03 PM
NenadBulaja, on 30 October 2011 - 10:49 AM, said:
So my theory goes like this, with dying out of Dragons, the Others grown stronger, and with the coming of the long winter decided to strike at the realms of Man again. Magic in the realms was weaker only in part related to fire and blood - the kind most useful against the Others. So Dragons are connected with THAT part of magic. So their appearance is connected to it, not coincidental.
By the way, Dire wolves are just larger sort of wolves, and Kraken is giant squid, mythical only because long time passed without seeing one.
Kraken is a giant squid that can destroy ships
Dang, can't wait for the next book to come out now.
#51
Posted 30 October 2011 - 06:15 PM
NenadBulaja, on 29 October 2011 - 10:01 AM, said:
Well that part (Jon=2nd head of Dragon) remains to be seen.
We do know that having Targaryen blood may not be help one to be immune from heat. And Dany's brother didn't seem to have any special affinity with the eggs.
#52
Posted 31 October 2011 - 04:25 PM
Lyvyathan, on 30 October 2011 - 06:03 PM, said:
Dang, can't wait for the next book to come out now.
Exactly, I don't deny its connected to the plot,and that it's no coincidence, the world is at the turning point, and all creatures feel it, and react to it.
To see some more mythical creatures?
#53
Posted 31 October 2011 - 04:31 PM
Lyvyathan, on 30 October 2011 - 06:15 PM, said:
We do know that having Targaryen blood may not be help one to be immune from heat. And Dany's brother didn't seem to have any special affinity with the eggs.
Yeah, it's just my speculation (more like wishful thinking).
I know, on another forum someone gave the fact Jon's hand got burned as crown evidence that he is not Targaryen. That is why, from now, I'm sharing my wisdom only with those of the same ilk (ASoIaF fanatics)
#54
Posted 31 October 2011 - 04:35 PM
Pomp & Happenstance, on 27 October 2011 - 02:03 PM, said:
Lyvyathan, on 29 October 2011 - 10:34 PM, said:
That makes me wonder about Euron's dragon horn that burnt the insides of the guy that blew it. Maybe Dany can blow it and live? I'm sure thats been mentioned elsewhere - but it seems to fit.
#55
Posted 31 October 2011 - 04:44 PM
I am totally committed to R+L = J Jon gets a dragon because he has Targ blood and if he doesn't have Targ blood then he still gets a dragon because he can warg.
#56
Posted 31 October 2011 - 04:46 PM
Queensmoot, on 31 October 2011 - 04:35 PM, said:
Yeah, GRRM does like to connect things in such way. And Dany is the future Dragon Queen of Westeros ( I hope,I hope - fingers crossed).
#57
Posted 31 October 2011 - 04:47 PM
Stark@heart, on 31 October 2011 - 04:44 PM, said:
I am totally committed to R+L = J Jon gets a dragon because he has Targ blood and if he doesn't have Targ blood then he still gets a dragon because he can warg.
Agreed, it's a win/win situation. Hope Martin reads this.
#58
Posted 31 October 2011 - 05:00 PM
#60
Posted 31 October 2011 - 05:34 PM
Stark@heart, on 31 October 2011 - 04:44 PM, said:
Did it mention the white fluid? Thanks, I'll have to read it again. But even if it did - it would still indicate that Dany has special supernatural powers which enable her to resist fire. Basically, the same phenemenon which occurred when she stepped into the pyre. Weeping white fluid is not the same as being charcoaled
Mayhaps Dragon's fire has different properties as normal fire? The way GRRM writes about the Dragon's flesh being so hot that its melting away the spear point seems to indicate that they have special properties not found in normal creatures.







