[No Spoilers] Was Cersei Sincere?
#41
Posted 29 April 2011 - 03:04 PM
#42
Posted 29 April 2011 - 03:15 PM
SwordoftheMorning, on 25 April 2011 - 06:41 PM, said:
This.
There are little hints through Episode 1 and 2 that Cersei is not a nice figure. In Episode 1, she unnerves Sansa and (in a medieval setting) hugely offends Catelyn by asking about Sansa's menstruation. That's just one. In Episode 2, she's repeatedly refering to Bran, and hoping he dies.
Does this really seem like someone who wouldn't lie about a dead child?
#43
Posted 29 April 2011 - 08:14 PM
It's a matter of life or death for Cersei, Jamie, and her three children. She can still feel for the mother even when she wants the boy to die.
Edited by TerraPrime, 29 April 2011 - 08:49 PM.
#44
Posted 29 April 2011 - 09:30 PM
Tomacatawata, on 29 April 2011 - 08:14 PM, said:
It's a matter of life or death for Cersei, Jamie, and her three children. She can still feel for the mother even when she wants the boy to die.
ummm no. Cersei was panicked almost beyond words. She wanted Jamie to do exactly what he did. Which was (attempt to) kill Bran. This is a no spoiler thread, so that's as much as we can say.
#45
Posted 30 April 2011 - 01:19 AM
Edited by Xray:
I edited out the quoted spoiler, and deleted the quoted post. But I'm leaving SotM's rant in because it is righteous (also, correct).
Edited by Xray the Enforcer, 30 April 2011 - 10:02 AM.
#46
Posted 30 April 2011 - 01:57 AM
In trying to think of something to add to the topic that is not spoiler material...
I think Ceresi wants Bran to die, but I do think she felt sorry for Catelyn too. As a mother herself, I don't see how Ceresi couldn't have sympathized with Catelyn to some degree. For my point of view though, telling Catelyn an entirely unnecessary lie would be far too risky and stupid (yes, even for Ceresi), so I think it happened as she described it. Yes, if she's telling the truth, that does change what we know from the books, but I assume that was a conscience choice that was made by the producers for what they probably felt was better for dramatic reasons.
Edited by Mellisandra, 30 April 2011 - 02:00 AM.
#47
Posted 01 May 2011 - 07:54 PM
#48
Posted 12 May 2011 - 06:03 PM
Loras, on 26 April 2011 - 11:29 AM, said:
This is really clever, except I think it's more about her desire to protect her remaining kids.
A lot of people seem to have this knee-jerk reaction that she's lying because she's a villain. But it's knee-jerk, and boring.
Essentially, there are three possibilities here:
1) That child never existed.
2) The child existed, and Cersei had a hand in his death.
3) The child existed, and Cersei did not have a hand in his death.
I hope it's #3, from a character-depth perspective. Also, I think it's pretty clear that Cersei does care about her existing children; since she has maternal instincts, I can't imagine her murdering her own child. Although I suppose it's possible that she induced a late-term abortion.
In favor of #1, it seems really weird that the whole kingdom--let alone the wife of one of the most important nobles and the king's BFF--would have been ignorant of the king and queen's firstborn child. And I don't think we ever see that kind of secrecy in the books. But based on the fact that Cersei tells it that way and Catelyn seems to believe her, it looks like we have to conclude that this is a possibility there.
#49
Posted 13 May 2011 - 01:52 AM
I have no idea what the practice was in medieval settings though for royal children that were either stillborn or died within a few hours of being born though. If a prince was born and died within a day from birthing complications or health issues, how wide spread would this knowledge be I wonder? And how wide spread would the knowledge be in neighboring countries that the queen was even expecting a child? It'd be interesting to know those things, though I'm not sure where to begin to research them.
Edited by Mellisandra, 13 May 2011 - 01:54 AM.
#50
Posted 18 May 2011 - 10:48 PM
NovemberElizabeth, on 25 April 2011 - 11:59 AM, said:
I want to know what others' reactions were/are to this...
I think she was sincere. Cersei is a complex person that's trying to defend and preserve what she thinks is important. It can lead her to be brutal, but I also think she can still feel sympathy. Sort of like "The kid had to take the fall but I do really feel for you about it cuz I've been there".
#51
Posted 11 June 2011 - 06:38 AM
Edited by Katarzyna Wierszowska, 11 June 2011 - 06:44 AM.
#52
Posted 01 September 2011 - 10:57 AM
Liadin, on 12 May 2011 - 06:03 PM, said:
A lot of people seem to have this knee-jerk reaction that she's lying because she's a villain. But it's knee-jerk, and boring.
Essentially, there are three possibilities here:
1) That child never existed.
2) The child existed, and Cersei had a hand in his death.
3) The child existed, and Cersei did not have a hand in his death.
I hope it's #3, from a character-depth perspective. Also, I think it's pretty clear that Cersei does care about her existing children; since she has maternal instincts, I can't imagine her murdering her own child. Although I suppose it's possible that she induced a late-term abortion.
In favor of #1, it seems really weird that the whole kingdom--let alone the wife of one of the most important nobles and the king's BFF--would have been ignorant of the king and queen's firstborn child. And I don't think we ever see that kind of secrecy in the books. But based on the fact that Cersei tells it that way and Catelyn seems to believe her, it looks like we have to conclude that this is a possibility there.
Your playing down her hatred of Robert, She did not want to have his children and when the moon tea didn't work she poisoned the child. It sealed it for me when she described how the baby looked like Robert with the dark hair.
#53
Posted 02 September 2011 - 10:16 PM
grandmazter3, on 01 September 2011 - 10:57 AM, said:
Doesn't the tv show play down her hatred of Robert though? It didn't occur to me that she might be sincere until she had that conversation with Robert and afterwards, Ned. Anyway, me, I'd be happy if there were differences between the tv and book version; I don't need two exact, same Cerseis.
Edited by Knight of Ashes, 02 September 2011 - 10:18 PM.
#54
Posted 06 November 2011 - 12:41 PM
#55
Posted 06 February 2012 - 02:52 PM
Loved the "CSI" moment when Cat is in the tower and finds that disturbed spot where they were "doing it" and the long blonde hair. Maybe if she put the dark-haired baby comment together with the hair and the shapes in the dirt, she'd have figured a lot of things out right then and there. Don't think she's quite that smart, though. If only she had the technology they have in the tv series Bones.
#56
Posted 07 February 2012 - 07:10 PM
Jennelyn, on 06 February 2012 - 02:52 PM, said:
I'm sure when word gets out about the reason Ned opposed Joff for the throne (the reason he lost his head) Cat will put 2 and 1 together and get 3 incestuously conceived kids.
#57
Posted 12 June 2012 - 04:24 PM
GoTreviews, on 27 April 2011 - 05:19 AM, said:
http://img855.images...iwinterfell.jpg
I guess there was... Something in the hair... YEEEEEEAAAAH
This was just perfect.
#58
Posted 15 June 2012 - 06:14 AM
Edited by Zar Lannister, 15 June 2012 - 06:15 AM.
#59
Posted 17 June 2012 - 07:53 PM
About Cersei lying: in one of the episodes she mentions to Robert about their dead child, so I think she was not lying about the child itself but she might have had a hand in his demise as horrible as that sounds. She did not want Robert's children. When Ned let her know he knew about her 3 children's father being Jaime she said,"Thank the Gods."
#60
Posted 19 June 2012 - 01:47 AM







