Xxtayce, on 17 May 2011 - 08:05 AM, said:
[Book Spoilers] Renly and Loras
#61
Posted 17 May 2011 - 11:31 AM
#62
Posted 17 May 2011 - 11:52 AM
"Renly is still a child. He sits in council and jests with Littlefinger and at tourneys he dons his splendid suit of armor and allows himself to be knocked off his horse by a better man."
In this case Stannis is a secondhand source, but he's a fair person and that coincides with how my imagination from my first two or three series reads interpreted Renly. I thought he had longer hair, but personality wise I was happy with HBO's characterization of him. I didn't appreciate the Renly/Loras scene but only because I loved the subtle hints at their relationship in the books.
#63
Posted 17 May 2011 - 12:07 PM
ZombieWife, on 17 May 2011 - 11:00 AM, said:
#64
Posted 17 May 2011 - 12:42 PM
smegma, on 17 May 2011 - 07:56 AM, said:
Abaddon, on 17 May 2011 - 09:26 AM, said:
#65
Posted 17 May 2011 - 12:59 PM
Tywin, on 17 May 2011 - 12:07 PM, said:
True. But, Jaime's part (for example) has been beefed up for book 1.
As of now, I'm okay with everything, but I wouldn't mind seeing more depth to Renly. If not, then next season.
#66
Posted 17 May 2011 - 01:11 PM
#67
Posted 17 May 2011 - 01:16 PM
Lord Varys, on 17 May 2011 - 01:11 PM, said:
#68
Posted 17 May 2011 - 01:27 PM
Lord Godric, on 17 May 2011 - 01:16 PM, said:
Which, I guess is also foreshadowed here, since Renly is presented as someone who isn't ruthless enough to grab the throne for himself, yet cares about the good of the realm. It will make his offer to support Ned much more interesting, though, since we'll be wondering how sincere his support for Ned really is, or if he's beginning a plot to put himself on the throne.
#69
Posted 17 May 2011 - 01:30 PM
Starchaser, on 17 May 2011 - 11:52 AM, said:
"Renly is still a child. He sits in council and jests with Littlefinger and at tourneys he dons his splendid suit of armor and allows himself to be knocked off his horse by a better man."
In this case Stannis is a secondhand source, but he's a fair person and that coincides with how my imagination from my first two or three series reads interpreted Renly. I thought he had longer hair, but personality wise I was happy with HBO's characterization of him. I didn't appreciate the Renly/Loras scene but only because I loved the subtle hints at their relationship in the books.
Agreed.
I am also rereading ACOK, and just read the part where Donal Noye describes the Baratheons: Robert is steel, Stannis is iron, and Renly is copper- pretty and shiny, but not that strong.
I think tv-Renly is fine. I don't believe that, in the books, we're supposed to view Renly as the most charismatic guy in the kingdom. I think it's just that, among the people with a plausible claim to the throne, he's more appealing than the alternatives- Stannis or Joffrey (or Tommen).
-
#70
Posted 17 May 2011 - 01:38 PM
Xenophon, on 17 May 2011 - 01:27 PM, said:
Edited by Lord Godric, 17 May 2011 - 01:40 PM.
#71
Posted 17 May 2011 - 02:27 PM
1) Robert is dead, and
2) Renly knows that all of "Robert's" children are in fact Jaime's.
Therefore the only real claim to the throne better than Renly's is Stannis's.
Here, as Renly objects, he's fourth in the line of succession, and there's no reason to think that Robert is going to die immediately, and even when he does, there are THREE CHILDREN who have a better claim to the throne (remember, female children come before male siblings in the books in Westeros, although that seems to be different in the TV show, so let's leave it at TWO). It's pretty different to suggest that Renly should be King in this scenario compared to when he declares in the book.
It's not a big deal, and one can reasonably suppose that musings were going on behind the scenes earlier. However, it still makes me think that the TV show Renly is a tad bit less loyal to Robert and his (at this time supposed) nephews than the book Renly, with not a lot of textual evidence to support the latter conclusion admittedly. I don't mind that change (if it is indeed a change), I'm just more curious about whether anyone sees it as different, like I do, or not.
Edited by Abaddon, 17 May 2011 - 02:29 PM.
#72
Posted 17 May 2011 - 02:46 PM
Tywin, on 17 May 2011 - 05:56 AM, said:
Agreed! There have been some eye-opening statements on this thread. "I have no problem with them being gay"... well, good! As a gay man, I have no problem with Jaime and Ned and all the others straight characters being straight. "Too much gayness!!!" LOL. I suppose if I have to suffer through all the "straightness" and multitudes of sex scenes between men and women, a few seconds of gay sex isn't too much to ask ist it?
Of course I'm being facetious - I don't mind the straight sex scenes at all - but it's illuminating how some folks respond to scenes like this. Their gayness is 1) EXTREMELY OBVIOUS in the books, although it is true there are no explicit sex scenes (as we don't have their POV), and 2) Part of their personalities and an important part of the dynamic between 2 fairly major characters, and families. I love the fact that it's being pushed to the forefront.
I have some quibbles about Renly's portrayal. That said, I think the actor playing him (even though he doesn't seem like Renly to me) is excellent.
#73
Posted 17 May 2011 - 02:58 PM
Abbadon,
neither Loras nor Renly know about the incest when Renly crowns himself. He only learns about it later on through one of Stannis' letters to Randyll Tarly when he feasts at Horn Hill. The chances are not that bad that both the book- and the series-Renly would have supported Ned and Stannis had he known about the incest. I'm quite sure that Renly did not want to fight against Ned.
#74
Posted 17 May 2011 - 03:22 PM
WordOf, on 17 May 2011 - 08:27 AM, said:
Just because you failed to realize it hardly means it's "open to interpretation." It isn't. There are numerous passages in the book that indicate that Renly and Loras are gay and GRRM himself confirmed it. Pretty much every non-Stark character in the series knows it.
Edit: Ah the mods got to it first, was just going to delete that portion.
Edited by Cereal Forel, 17 May 2011 - 03:28 PM.
#75
Posted 17 May 2011 - 03:33 PM
EDIT: Guess I should stay on topic. I'm beginning to accept the Renly of the TV series, although I still think he's vastly different from the books. The main problem I have is that he doesn't have to be the opposite of Robert in order to be different. Renly struck me as a happy, magnanimous, self-assured person in the books (and yes, a willing participant in tournies), if a little shallow and one-dimensional. That is much different from Robert. No need for them to be complete opposites in every way... And yeah, he is way too Abercrombie. That adjective seems to fit perfectly.
Edited by Lone, 17 May 2011 - 03:43 PM.
#76
Posted 17 May 2011 - 03:44 PM
Edited by Mellisandra, 17 May 2011 - 03:46 PM.
#77
Posted 17 May 2011 - 04:35 PM
#78
Posted 17 May 2011 - 04:42 PM
Then I thought about it. It really made me re-evaluate the books. I've read them countless times and never picked up on any homosexual undertones between Renly and Loras. But thinking back, it really seems like a strong possibility. Like all the hints are there, just under the surface. So in that light, I appreciate that the TV show is perhaps more overt with things that may be left unsaid in the books. It certainly makes me appreciate Martin's gift for subtlety.
#79
Posted 17 May 2011 - 06:31 PM
Abaddon, on 17 May 2011 - 02:27 PM, said:
1) Robert is dead, and
2) Renly knows that all of "Robert's" children are in fact Jaime's.
The parley between Renly and Stannis makes it quite clear that Renly had no idea that Joffrey, Myrcella, and Tommen were bastards born of incest until he got Stannis's proclamation to that effect, well after he had proclaimed himself king.
#80
Posted 17 May 2011 - 07:39 PM







