I'm trying to figure out this thesis wherein television viewers are so much more dumb and dull than fantasy readers that they will be turned off by plot twists en masse.
Do the readers here really think themselves so much more sophisticated than the television audience out there? Now, normally, I would take a reader over a non-reader, but I hate to burst everyone's bubble, but fantasy ain't exactly Thomas Pynchon or Boz Dickens. And shockingly, there are many smart people and readers out there who haven't read ASOIF. I know. Crazy.
Many television viewers -- and HBO viewers especially -- appreciate a good story just and much as you or I. They aren't going to scream like little children and turn off the program because of a plot twist. There's a few fans that might ditch if they were only watching for their favorite character, etc., but no more than the odd person who quit reading after a plot point in the book.
We all appreciated the story as it came. So will the vast majority of viewers.
I don't feel like anyone who has read Dave Eddings, Raymond Feist, Robert Jordan, Terry Goodkind, etc., can claim intellectual superiority to anyone. Let's stop acting as if Martin is some kind of inaccessible writer who the average person won't appreciate.
EDIT #1: Just because I know this will start a crapstorm: you can throw Steven Erickson in there, as well. The only man Leo Tolstoy thought needed an editor. And R. Scott Bakker - where freshman psych turns into freshman porn.
EDIT #2: In terms of factual evidence, I have seven friends who are non-readers watching (that I know of). None of them are likely to ditch for plot-related reasons, though one female friend of mine keeps trying to get assurances that Khal Drogo stays around merely for the eye candy. Poor Elissa.
Edited by gogorath, 07 June 2011 - 01:22 AM.