[ADWD Spoilers] Friends in The Reach
#21
Posted 04 August 2011 - 05:08 PM
#22
Posted 04 August 2011 - 05:09 PM
bens, on 04 August 2011 - 02:11 PM, said:
Anyway, there's a thread on here somewhere that presents some pretty good evidence that Lord Rowan is the supporter in the Reach, and possibly also Lady Oakheart or Lord Tarly, all of whom are pretty big deals.
Also, House Peake is still around, but Lord Peake's wife is a Lannister--not likely to back Aegon.
House Mandrake appears to have never been mentioned before.
What is the evidence that Mathis Rowan is the secret friend?
#23
Posted 04 August 2011 - 05:12 PM
#24
Posted 04 August 2011 - 05:13 PM
Reyne, on 04 August 2011 - 05:08 PM, said:
#25
Posted 04 August 2011 - 05:43 PM
#26
Posted 04 August 2011 - 05:55 PM
Markus, on 04 August 2011 - 04:46 PM, said:
Could maybe remotely see the Queen of Thorns finally giving up on Mace and abandoning him. Despite being his mother, she does think he's a total fool and never approved of the alliance with the Lannisters. But that seems unlikely to me.
Edited by bens, 04 August 2011 - 05:56 PM.
#27
Posted 04 August 2011 - 05:58 PM
LordBloodravenI, on 04 August 2011 - 04:49 PM, said:
There is the slight matter of him being a total dick, he threatens to have his son killed and then sends him away to the wall to die, he is overproud, and is a misogenist.
#28
Posted 04 August 2011 - 06:01 PM
Stallion That Mounts Texas, on 04 August 2011 - 05:09 PM, said:
He's expressed more discomfort than the other Reach lords in the past about the murder of Elia and her children, and he hated Tywin Lannister's sense of "justice". Additionally, he and Mace Tyrell were sent off to besiege Storm's End, but he never came back, while Mace and all of the other Reach Lords (except the recluse Lord Hightower) have converged on King's Landing and begun ruling. He hasn't been seen on screen since Margaery and Tommen were wed and is not participating in the Small Council otherwise taken over by Reach Lords.
The very fact that he seems to be leading the siege at Storm's End, combined with Jon Connington's odd confidence in taking the castle, suggests that he's a supporter.
Edited by bens, 04 August 2011 - 06:04 PM.
#29
Posted 04 August 2011 - 06:13 PM
Kaitscralt, on 04 August 2011 - 05:12 PM, said:
I think that it's meant to sound plausible that he could come from an existing family, and picking one that used to be in power but currently isn't very infulential means that it's less likely for somebody to out him as a fake. It's a bit of Qyburn being a prat in naming him too, though.
#30
Posted 04 August 2011 - 07:39 PM
MinotaurWarrior, on 04 August 2011 - 05:13 PM, said:
I may have missed something here, though.
Quote
Edited by Reyne, 04 August 2011 - 07:40 PM.
#31
Posted 04 August 2011 - 08:00 PM
#32
Posted 04 August 2011 - 08:12 PM
Quote
That can't be true, we know that Rhaenyra had two sons who survived the Dance of Dragons, the future Aegon III and Viserys II.
#33
Posted 04 August 2011 - 08:57 PM
MinotaurWarrior, on 04 August 2011 - 04:49 PM, said:
Agree with this 100%, King's Landing is going to be a complete madhouse
I agree with Randyll Tarly being a big figure here-- the guy is like a younger, mini Tywin Lannister and seems to be being built up as a major force
If he throws in with Aegon, things will get very interesting...
#34
Posted 04 August 2011 - 09:26 PM
Reyne, on 04 August 2011 - 07:39 PM, said:
I may have missed something here, though.
I'm not sure what this has to do with each other. How would having a supporter outside of Storm's End help Connington take the castle itself?
I'm guessing that Connington will pose as a force loyal to Stannis and then feign to capture Lord Rowan and his men, getting Storm's End to open its gates.
#35
Posted 04 August 2011 - 09:32 PM
bens, on 04 August 2011 - 06:01 PM, said:
The very fact that he seems to be leading the siege at Storm's End, combined with Jon Connington's odd confidence in taking the castle, suggests that he's a supporter.
Interesting. Guess I need to do a re-read.
#36
Posted 04 August 2011 - 11:08 PM
Reyne, on 04 August 2011 - 05:08 PM, said:
How can Varys wield any influence over the High Septon? And the High Septon has indicated that he thinks very little of the charges against her.
The only person who can wield influence is Mace, with the army outside the gates. And I do not in any way see Mace allowing his little girl, the queen he's always dreamt of and his only tie to the Iron Throne, to die. I think if Margaery was about to die he'd unleash the power of Randyll MFing Tarly on whoever was threatening her, even the church.
Quote
#37
Posted 04 August 2011 - 11:46 PM
Davos, on 04 August 2011 - 08:12 PM, said:
Edited by The Horns of Jurbgotterath, 04 August 2011 - 11:48 PM.
#38
Posted 05 August 2011 - 02:00 AM
Davos, on 04 August 2011 - 08:12 PM, said:
After the death of Lyonel Strong Rhaenyra married again, some Targaryen. Aegon and Viserys were the sons of this second marriage. But the sons of her first marriage were all killed.
#39
Posted 05 August 2011 - 02:15 AM
Kadence, on 04 August 2011 - 11:08 PM, said:
How can Varys wield any influence over the High Septon? And the High Septon has indicated that he thinks very little of the charges against her.
The only person who can wield influence is Mace, with the army outside the gates. And I do not in any way see Mace allowing his little girl, the queen he's always dreamt of and his only tie to the Iron Throne, to die. I think if Margaery was about to die he'd unleash the power of Randyll MFing Tarly on whoever was threatening her, even the church.
I don't believe you can choose both a regular trial, *and* a trial by combat. You have to pick one or the other. Otherwise nobody would ever pick the trial by combat first, every single person accused of anything would choose regular trial first then use trial by combat as a backup plan.
well, tyrion had a trial at KL and then demanded a trial by combat, so apparently you can pick both
Edited by RAAM, 05 August 2011 - 02:16 AM.
#40
Posted 05 August 2011 - 02:27 AM
RAAM, on 05 August 2011 - 02:15 AM, said:
Tyrion had a trial but not a verdict. I think the suggestion is that you can only demand a verdict of the gods when no official worldly verdict has been reached.
Edited by Markus, 05 August 2011 - 02:28 AM.







