What do you think the title means?
#21
Posted 05 December 2011 - 10:33 PM
#22
Posted 06 December 2011 - 03:27 AM
#23
Posted 06 December 2011 - 09:13 AM
#24
Posted 07 December 2011 - 04:53 AM
#25
Posted 07 December 2011 - 08:12 PM
ryneanders, on 07 December 2011 - 04:53 AM, said:
No, dream of springwas the replacement for time for wolves, winds of witner was always separate
#26
Posted 08 December 2011 - 07:19 AM
Galen M, on 07 December 2011 - 08:12 PM, said:
what i meant to say was that either the winds of winter or a dream of spring was supposed to be titled a time for wolves. i didnt mean that affc or adwd was supposed to be titled that. correct me if im wrong, but i believe that was when he still thought it would be a five book series and that dance would be the fourth and a time for wolves would be the fifth and final book.
#27
Posted 08 December 2011 - 07:43 AM
ryneanders, on 08 December 2011 - 07:19 AM, said:
#28
Posted 08 December 2011 - 09:52 AM
Tyrionthebest, on 08 December 2011 - 07:43 AM, said:
The titles were
- A Game Of Thrones" (supposed to end with the RW --> likely became AGOT + Clash + Storm)
- A Dance With Dragons (supposed to end with Dany landing in Westeros ---> Feast, Dance + a bit of "Winds", because I'm expecting Dany to land in Westeros way before the books ends, or she wouldn't have enough time to do what she has to in ADOS)
- A Time For The Wolves (---> Winds and ADOS)
#29
Posted 08 December 2011 - 10:50 PM
Whatever, on 08 December 2011 - 09:52 AM, said:
The titles were
- A Game Of Thrones" (supposed to end with the RW --> likely became AGOT + Clash + Storm)
- A Dance With Dragons (supposed to end with Dany landing in Westeros ---> Feast, Dance + a bit of "Winds", because I'm expecting Dany to land in Westeros way before the books ends, or she wouldn't have enough time to do what she has to in ADOS)
- A Time For The Wolves (---> Winds and ADOS)
thats correct.
and i believe he speculated that the series would run to five books while he was writing storm of swords, with the final two volumes being a dance with dragons and a time for wolves.
#30
Posted 08 December 2011 - 11:09 PM
Stannis is ice and fire in one. Firey vengeance and icey justice
#31
Posted 09 December 2011 - 07:42 AM
Whatever, on 08 December 2011 - 09:52 AM, said:
The titles were
- A Game Of Thrones" (supposed to end with the RW --> likely became AGOT + Clash + Storm)
- A Dance With Dragons (supposed to end with Dany landing in Westeros ---> Feast, Dance + a bit of "Winds", because I'm expecting Dany to land in Westeros way before the books ends, or she wouldn't have enough time to do what she has to in ADOS)
- A Time For The Wolves (---> Winds and ADOS)
#32
Posted 10 December 2011 - 02:16 AM
that is a quote from the factual history of a song of ice and fire forum. you were right that winds of winter was a title since at least 1998, but im pretty sure when it was still a trilogy, the titles were agot, adwd, and atfw.
#33
Posted 11 December 2011 - 08:25 AM
ryneanders, on 10 December 2011 - 02:16 AM, said:
that is a quote from the factual history of a song of ice and fire forum. you were right that winds of winter was a title since at least 1998, but im pretty sure when it was still a trilogy, the titles were agot, adwd, and atfw.
#34
Posted 11 December 2011 - 09:02 PM
CrowRonin, on 05 December 2011 - 02:02 PM, said:
i'm new too, but i can't imagine that Jon was really assassinated in that mutiny ... i literally shut the book--more like my nook--an hour ago and am still sat here reeling. i will be absolutely devastated if jon snow dies. DEVASTATED!!!
#35
Posted 12 December 2011 - 12:46 PM
#36
Posted 13 December 2011 - 11:11 AM
ManyFacedOne, on 12 December 2011 - 12:46 PM, said:
I could be wrong, but didn't Martin say that when he was half way finished AGOT he knew it would be impossible to make the series a trilogy? I though the first book was supposed to end with the Red Wedding? So how could the first edition of A Game of Thrones list it as a trilogy when that idea had already been scrapped?
Edited by Francesco Totti, 13 December 2011 - 11:14 AM.
#37
Posted 13 December 2011 - 11:28 AM
Francesco Totti, on 13 December 2011 - 11:11 AM, said:
that was my impression as well. when he first started writing the series he imagined it as a trilogy, but when he realized a game of thrones was becoming way too long he published it where he did and was already well into a clash of kings. i think he was already aware that it would require at least five books by that point. of course i cant back this up... just remember hearing that while reading about the writing process somewhere.
#38
Posted 13 December 2011 - 12:53 PM
ryneanders, on 13 December 2011 - 11:28 AM, said:
Yea thats why I heard to, I mean at the time Game of Thrones ends, we haven't even seen half the stuff that George intended to happen in the first book. We hadn't even met Stannis or Melissandre or Mance Rayder, even though they had been talked about... the dragons had just been hatched, Bran hadn't even discovered his warging talent, the war of the five kings hasn't taken place, the red wedding hadn't happend etc.
That is why I consider A Game of Thrones, A Clash of Kings, and A Storm of Swords to be "Part I" of the series, then Feast and Dance are "Part II" and hopefully, Winds of Winter a A Dream of Spring will be "Part III"
#39
Posted 13 December 2011 - 06:41 PM
Francesco Totti, on 13 December 2011 - 12:53 PM, said:
That is why I consider A Game of Thrones, A Clash of Kings, and A Storm of Swords to be "Part I" of the series, then Feast and Dance are "Part II" and hopefully, Winds of Winter a A Dream of Spring will be "Part III"
thats how i see it too. and my guess is that winds of winter and dream of spring will need to be really long books to wrap everything up. as others have stated on this site, i think its quite possible there will be three more books left.
#40
Posted 13 December 2011 - 08:18 PM







