Why would Bran stay with BR for his entire lifetime?
#1
Posted 23 November 2011 - 10:00 AM
#2
Posted 26 November 2011 - 09:02 PM
Quote
Bran's come to accept his fate.
Edited by fireeater22, 26 November 2011 - 10:32 PM.
#3
Posted 26 November 2011 - 10:50 PM
Clearly, Martin intended Bran and Arya to be apprenticed during the interim, then go about their badass "the wolves will return" business. Eliminating the gap means we get to see more Bloodraven+Bran time.
But Bran staying with Bloodraven makes no sense at all. Bloodraven has to stay, he's a tree, he can't move. Plus once the Others come in force, that cave is going to be a very dangerous place to be.
And Bran clearly has an endgame. He can't accomplish this in a cave beyond the Wall, sitting on a tree. He will move South and re-enter the main plot. I frankly don't understand why people have this notion of Bran being stuck as a tree in that cave, it just does not compute in any way.
#4
Posted 26 November 2011 - 11:11 PM
fireeater22, on 26 November 2011 - 09:02 PM, said:
Bran's come to accept his fate.
Wait...don't the CotF have their own greenseers? The ones with Red Eyes (like the Ghost of High Heart)?
ETA: I don't think it's been foreshadowed that Bran will remain in the cave until the Others obliterate everything, or until the dust settles. What's the point? I'm sure he has a huge role to play as a greenseer, but as far as we know, Howland Reed (possible greenseer? or confirmed? I forget) had a normal life (ie a family, kids, kinda-lordship).
GRRM never suggested that once you become a greenseer you become stuck to a tree.
Edited by Silmarien, 26 November 2011 - 11:14 PM.
#5
Posted 27 November 2011 - 10:44 AM
Silmarien, on 26 November 2011 - 11:11 PM, said:
ETA: I don't think it's been foreshadowed that Bran will remain in the cave until the Others obliterate everything, or until the dust settles. What's the point? I'm sure he has a huge role to play as a greenseer, but as far as we know, Howland Reed (possible greenseer? or confirmed? I forget) had a normal life (ie a family, kids, kinda-lordship).
GRRM never suggested that once you become a greenseer you become stuck to a tree.
Bloodraven did tell Bran he wouldn't be able to walk, but he would be able to fly. Bran's body needs not to be south of the wall, perhaps?
#6
Posted 27 November 2011 - 12:29 PM
Because he is an emo boy who is excited becoming a tree while he murmurs "I am Brandon Stark of Winterfell and almost a man grown" - as if we need a reminder, but unlike him we did not forget this.
Tbh I don't see the point of this Bran side story, but I trully hope he will be as huge positive surprise as Doran was in the last Arianne chapter in aFfC.
#7
Posted 27 November 2011 - 12:53 PM
#8
Posted 27 November 2011 - 12:54 PM
I think some events are influenced by the "old gods" of which Bloodraven is part and Bran becoming part. My guess is that Bran will end up part of the tree. I'd be surprised if he ever returns South.
#9
Posted 27 November 2011 - 01:09 PM
#10
Posted 27 November 2011 - 04:59 PM
Grail King, on 27 November 2011 - 01:09 PM, said:
Edited by Tyrionthebest, 27 November 2011 - 05:00 PM.
#11
Posted 27 November 2011 - 05:29 PM
#12
Posted 27 November 2011 - 05:42 PM
#13
Posted 27 November 2011 - 09:24 PM
I was assuming that playing the tree game has a price and that it plays out the same every time. So if you like the perks of tree life you have to accept the downside which is gradual petrification. Maybe joining with the trees parallels cocaine use (a slight chance remains that Bran could kick the habit after he gets in deep, but most don't have the will power.)
#14
Posted 27 November 2011 - 09:32 PM
The Tree seat is simply the most simply and easy way for the children to get Bran and BR together to talky talk with some small comfort.
I really think all the theory's on Bran and his tree have been blown out of proportion.
#15
Posted 28 November 2011 - 11:18 PM
Then you have the added aspect of him having no other home to go to, and being a cripple.
That being said, I hope he doesn't stay up there, and probably won't. He still has family members remaining (Side note, drove me crazy that he didn't tell Jon that he was alive and nearby, but that is another topic) that he might feel urged to return to, and if the war with the Other's happens or something else, it would be hard to just stay in one spot forever. And who knows, maybe Bloodraven will die sooner than anticipated, leaving a bit of a problem. Or Bran learns there is more dangerous aspects of that world, and resists.
#16
Posted 29 November 2011 - 01:02 AM
I'd assume he wouldn't need one until he got very old, and would die without the weirwood "life-support".
#17
Posted 29 November 2011 - 07:40 AM
Silmarien, on 29 November 2011 - 01:02 AM, said:
I'd assume he wouldn't need one until he got very old, and would die without the weirwood "life-support".
#18
Posted 29 November 2011 - 07:55 AM
Tyrionthebest, on 29 November 2011 - 07:40 AM, said:
Quote
The Ghost of High Heart told Arya that she gorged on grief at Summerhal.
& it was said in one of Bran's chapters:
Quote
She might not be a greenseer though. I'm not sure but I think she definitely had the potential to be one.
#19
Posted 29 November 2011 - 02:24 PM
The Blind Eye, on 27 November 2011 - 09:32 PM, said:
The Tree seat is simply the most simply and easy way for the children to get Bran and BR together to talky talk with some small comfort.
I really think all the theory's on Bran and his tree have been blown out of proportion.
Yeah I agree with this,
It was also made clear in one of the Bran chapters that he doesn't need to be in the throne to use the Weirwoods. I can definitely see him returning South in the next book.
As far as I'm converned the only reason why he wouldn't go home when he is trained up would be because the Others have cut him off from the Wall. Otherwise why stay? that cave isn't the most exciting place.
If Bran wishes to extend his years like BR when he is older he can return, or make his own throne in Winterfell
Personally I have a pet theory that Bran's skills may be needed to restore Jon to his original body, although thats just wild speculation on my part.
#20
Posted 29 November 2011 - 02:30 PM
I could be totally wrong about this.







