Who do you want to win the Iron Throne?
#1
Posted 19 December 2011 - 05:43 PM
#2
Posted 19 December 2011 - 08:12 PM
It should be Daenerys, really. The Throne has been the Targaryen's for generations, and Robert only sat it through the murder of children (even if he didn't do it himself). Stannis is second.
#3
Posted 19 December 2011 - 08:27 PM
vindictus, on 19 December 2011 - 08:12 PM, said:
It should be Daenerys, really. The Throne has been the Targaryen's for generations, and Robert only sat it through the murder of children (even if he didn't do it himself). Stannis is second.
E: Also, I think it was the Lannisters who murdered them---to show their loyalty to Robert.
Edited by Ser Barristan Stark, 19 December 2011 - 08:28 PM.
#4
Posted 20 December 2011 - 12:54 AM
#5
Posted 20 December 2011 - 08:06 AM
Quote
Well Robert killed Rhaegarn himself no?
As for the question I think my favorite character, Jon should sit at the Iron Throne (I'm sure Stannis will sit on it at some point, the flames showed that if I remember correctly) Tyrion would have been my second choice but unfortunately he went to the dark side so now he is out.
Daenerys too but I suspect that she is not quite right in the head (death of her husband - who she loved as a result of Stockholm Syndrome I guess- and her child and these coming after she has been abused by her brother for years, pretty much ruined her phsyce. I do feel sympathetic towards her but I don't think hers will be a happy kingdom.
#6
Posted 20 December 2011 - 03:59 PM
#7
Posted 20 December 2011 - 10:10 PM
Ser Barristan Stark, on 19 December 2011 - 08:27 PM, said:
E: Also, I think it was the Lannisters who murdered them---to show their loyalty to Robert.
That's true, but the war wasn't actually for the throne. Robert was pissed because of
1. Lyanna being stolen by Rhaegar (as he saw it, anyway)
2. The Mad King and his transgressions against the Stark family, with whom Robert was close
So it was more of a war to displace Aerys and rescue Lyanna, than a war to conquer the Throne. The Lannisters brutally murdered Rhaegar's heirs, and Aerys' direct heirs had to flee. By rights, it belongs to Dany.
#8
Posted 21 December 2011 - 07:45 AM
#9
Posted 21 December 2011 - 10:57 AM
Taiwanted, on 21 December 2011 - 07:45 AM, said:
E: It doesn't matter why Robert Rebelled, the Iron Throne obviously was part of their plan, seeing that Eddard ran to the throne room to secure it for Robert.
Edited by Ser Barristan Stark, 21 December 2011 - 10:59 AM.
#10
Posted 21 December 2011 - 11:04 AM
Ser Barristan Stark, on 21 December 2011 - 10:57 AM, said:
E: It doesn't matter why Robert Rebelled, the Iron Throne obviously was part of their plan, seeing that Eddard ran to the throne room to secure it for Robert.
Well....some theories say that Jon might be the son of Lyana Stark and Rahegar Targeryan....but is not a spoiler, just a theory....but the truth is that are many hints to believe so and also i think it fits very well GRRM style...but who know...
#11
Posted 21 December 2011 - 10:19 PM
#12
Posted 22 December 2011 - 09:46 AM
TeamDanyArya, on 21 December 2011 - 10:19 PM, said:
Edited by Ser Malthred Stark, 27 January 2012 - 09:46 PM.
#13
Posted 22 December 2011 - 10:00 AM
No idea how heritage laws are in Westeros, or in countries in the real world. But normally uncles and brothers and nephews are potential successors to a throne, because they had a father or grandfather that was king. But what happens if your brother was the first king ? Do those rules still apply ?
Jon has no right to any throne. He's a bastard. Yes, maybe he has Targaryen blood. But that's not enough. If blood is enough, then there are 17 bastards of Robert that have equal rights to the throne.
In real-life I am strongly against any monarchy and any form of nobility. ASOIAF has re-inforced my believes. Everyone that is high-born turns out to be a jerk. I don't think it's a coincedence that the most sympathetic characters in ASIOF are the people who do not have a noble background, or who were thrown out of the higher circles. Outcasts and bastards.
So imho it would be best if Westeros ended up without a king. Give it a goverment, chosen by the people.
Edited by Gryz, 22 December 2011 - 10:01 AM.
#14
Posted 22 December 2011 - 01:54 PM
Darkhorse . . in the whole matter . . Arya Stark . . . . .
#15
Posted 23 December 2011 - 07:40 AM
So Danny is the real heir, but her dad was a lunatic, but if you read Jaime´s POV it seems that Aerys was not that bad of a king, then he had a fit.
Then there is Jon Snow, as the name of the series implies - A Song of Ice and Fire - it seems most obvious (or likely) that house Stark and Targaryen will be the major houses in the end of it all.
Maybe Sansa will take back Winterfell, Arya I jus't don't know, maybe she will go back to Westeros and her family, and she will probably help them out a lot, since I don't see her going the Blackfyre way (killing your own family members).
It is a complicated scenario we got, but most likely it will be a Stark or Targaryen ruling the entire kingdom, or it will be split into 7 again.
There is also Dorne - where we see Doran Martell say he wants to bring back Vengeance.
So the end of A Feast for Crows - made us go into a clusterf*ck of indecision on who should sit on the throne.
#16
Posted 24 December 2011 - 08:40 AM
He should be a king of Kings Landing, Crownlands, Dragonstone and Stormlands. He would rule there, but The Reach, Dorne, Westerlands, Riverlands, Iron Isles and The North should be independent kingdoms, ruled by their own kings (or princes).
#17
Posted 24 December 2011 - 09:33 AM
Gryz, on 22 December 2011 - 10:00 AM, said:
No idea how heritage laws are in Westeros, or in countries in the real world. But normally uncles and brothers and nephews are potential successors to a throne, because they had a father or grandfather that was king. But what happens if your brother was the first king ? Do those rules still apply ?
Jon has no right to any throne. He's a bastard. Yes, maybe he has Targaryen blood. But that's not enough. If blood is enough, then there are 17 bastards of Robert that have equal rights to the throne.
In real-life I am strongly against any monarchy and any form of nobility. ASOIAF has re-inforced my believes. Everyone that is high-born turns out to be a jerk. I don't think it's a coincedence that the most sympathetic characters in ASIOF are the people who do not have a noble background, or who were thrown out of the higher circles. Outcasts and bastards.
So imho it would be best if Westeros ended up without a king. Give it a goverment, chosen by the people.
#18
Posted 24 December 2011 - 09:36 AM
#19
Posted 24 December 2011 - 11:36 AM
Ser Barristan Stark, on 19 December 2011 - 08:27 PM, said:
E: Also, I think it was the Lannisters who murdered them---to show their loyalty to Robert.
The Targaryens conquered and united the seven kingdoms. Robert usurped the throne.
#20
Posted 24 December 2011 - 06:17 PM
PatrickStormborn, on 24 December 2011 - 11:36 AM, said:
The Targaryens conquered and united the seven kingdoms. Robert usurped the throne.
Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: Iron Throne
A Song of Ice and Fire: The Novels →
General (ASoIaF) →
Dany as ruler of the Seven KingdomsStarted by Ser Lepus , 29 Feb 2012 |
|
|







