Why is Alysane Mormont with Stannis?
#21
Posted 14 January 2012 - 07:29 AM
Fighting the ironborn and the freeing Arya thing would seem to be justification.
The x factor is Alysane is not lady of Bear Island. Maege is.
Why would an heir or Castellan tie her houses cause to Stannis without Maeges approval?
Unless she had approval. Maege went north with Galbart Glover of deepwood motte. It all ties together somehow.
#22
Posted 14 January 2012 - 10:48 AM
#24
Posted 14 January 2012 - 12:31 PM
FanTasy, on 14 January 2012 - 11:10 AM, said:
I always wondered just how closely he and Maege Mormont knew each other, Aly kind of looks little like his daughter, but he is also called Giantsbane, so he may have something with that missing Umbers daughter.
#25
Posted 18 January 2012 - 10:06 AM
Tini, on 14 January 2012 - 10:48 AM, said:
#26
Posted 18 January 2012 - 10:17 AM
Free Northman, on 13 January 2012 - 01:25 PM, said:
I fail to see why they would be willing to swear to Stannis. I think they want to USE Stannis to get rid of the Boltons, and then when they have Winterfell back, to declare Robb's will and put Jon on the throne as King in the North.
They have no desire to swear to Stannis whatsoever. This is a fantasy dreamed up by Stannis supporters.
Didn't Stannis tell Cat that Robb would be free to call himself whatever he wanted. He could keep the title "king" so long as he did fealty to Stannis? (or was that Renly?)
I think she its there to evaluate Stannis and determine if he is someone the north can negotiate with. Restoring WF to the Starks would go a long way to winning the North's support. If he proves worthy, she may have more than just her own family to offer.
#27
Posted 18 January 2012 - 10:20 AM
#28
Posted 18 January 2012 - 11:05 AM
Anyway, when I read the book, I didn't put much thought into this subject; it seemed clear to me that she was only there with Stannis because that was their best chance to free Winterfell from Bolton and rescue who they believe to be Arya.
#29
Posted 19 January 2012 - 03:20 AM
sarah.jenice, on 13 January 2012 - 10:17 AM, said:
I believe in the past the Mormonts were probably Wargs, but I don't know if I believe any of them are in the present. A warg and it's beast, are inseparable, and we haven't seen any of the Mormants with a bear, or any animal for that matter. Jorah, the Old bear, Maege, Dacey, Alysane....we have "met" all these characters, and none of them had/have an animal that travels with them every where they go, or anywhere they go for that matter. I agree maybe one of the Mormants we have not "met" yet, is a Warg.
As for the argument, that maybe they just didn't take their beasts with them???
I would say that, Robb took Grey Wind with him south. Jon took Ghost with him , into the Haunted Forest, on the Old Bears Ranging. Vyamer six skins had all six of his beasts, in the battle at the Wall. My point is, if any of the Mormont's we have "met" are Wargs, then why wouldn't they have their beast with them.
Jon feels that Ghost doesn't count as a friend, because Ghost is more than that, Ghost is a part of Jon. All Wargs feel this way towards there beasts, so I can not see a Warg leaving his beast behind. Jon only ever leaves Ghost for a long period of time, when he has to climb the Wall, that was when he absolutely had to leave him, because there was no way for Ghost to get over the Wall.
So in short, like I said, they could have been Wargs in the past, or maybe one of the Mormonts we have not "met" yet, is a Warg. But I don't believe any of them that we have "met" are Wargs, for reasons I have already listed.
Side note.
Did Alysane Mormont bring any Men with her, to Stannis, or just herself? I can't remember if she brought some Mormont Bannermen or not?if she did bring some, how many did she bring? If she didn't, wouldn't that be weird? The heir to Bear Island traveling alone(wouldn't that be a big hostage risk, she is pretty important)? Surely there were some men available to take with her? I guess I should just wait for the answer if she brought men or not with her, before I start asking all these "why not questions"
Edited by Ghost714, 19 January 2012 - 03:33 AM.
#30
Posted 19 January 2012 - 10:53 AM
#31
Posted 20 January 2012 - 12:54 AM
Ghost714, on 19 January 2012 - 03:20 AM, said:
"Are you freaking kidding me?" cawed the Raven. "Are you freaking kidding me?"
Edited by Jory, 20 January 2012 - 12:54 AM.
#32
Posted 20 January 2012 - 03:23 PM
#33
Posted 20 January 2012 - 05:04 PM
Lexy Boleyn, on 20 January 2012 - 03:23 PM, said:
That would certainly fit with the whole 'do what needs be done' attitude of the family. I mean the Mormont apparent sexual equality in martial training appears to be far more practically minded than the rather more idealistic feminism you find in Dorne; for a Mormont woman being able to fight is not about any high notions of fairness (indeed she probably has far more important things to think about) rather than on Bear Island there simply isn't the luxury to being a non-combatant due to the regular Iron-born raids. Indeed the ideal Mormont woman is arguably one who successfully raises as many children as practically possible (everyone a potential future defender of Bear Island and insurance against the Mormonts dying out) whilst being as skilled with blades in battle as she is in the kitchen!
You never hear anything about any Mormont women's husbands in any official status and neither have we ever heard about any Mormont bastards. Is it possible that some or even all of Maege Mormont's daughters and their children are technically bastards conceived by whichever 'Bear-in-the-woods' took their mother's fancy on any given night? After all a child born of the Lady of Bear Island is a child born of the Lady of Island potentially capable of both defending Bear island and continuing the Mormont line regardless of gender or whether its father was married to its mother.
What happens on Bear Island stays on Bear Island...
Edited by Knight of the Teabags, 20 January 2012 - 05:08 PM.
#34
Posted 20 January 2012 - 05:37 PM
Knight of the Teabags, on 20 January 2012 - 05:04 PM, said:
You never hear anything about any Mormont women's husbands in any official status and neither have we ever heard about any Mormont bastards. Is it possible that some or even all of Maege Mormont's daughters and their children are technically bastards conceived by whichever 'Bear-in-the-woods' took their mother's fancy on any given night? After all a child born of the Lady of Bear Island is a child born of the Lady of Island potentially capable of both defending Bear island and continuing the Mormont line regardless of gender or whether its father was married to its mother.
What happens on Bear Island stays on Bear Island...
- Lord Mormont NEVER mentionned his sister's husband, ans I think he would have been supposed to leave him the lordship of Bear Island, if he was a suitable noble.
-Considering Bear Island culture, choosing a consort from this culture is better, instead of "betraying it" ( Lynesse Hightower almost made her husband do it). Plus he must be strong to sire healthy kids ( daughters and sons being equally considered)
-After the Ironborn raids, the men who survived/ were not taken away for a ramsom were probably commoners, even if they were maimed or acted cowardly. So having no official consort/a consort who wouldn't be executed or kidnapped to get money was wisest. And it kept the island in the family.
But as you said, what happens on Bear Island...
PS: it doesn't seem to be a "physical pattern" for the Mormonts, like Stark's long faces and grey eyes, Lannister's blond mane and green eyes... Could it be another argument for my theory ( more commoner blood and genes than any other family, ad if a bear was involved, some trait would give evidence)?
Edited by Lexy Boleyn, 21 January 2012 - 03:43 AM.
#35
Posted 20 January 2012 - 08:45 PM
Also does anyone think that Alysane could have anything to do with Asha wanting Stannis to take Theon to the weirwood?
#36
Posted 21 January 2012 - 09:28 PM
Hose siglils of the North
Stark- Dire wolf
Glover- Mailed fist
Wull- three buckets
Cerwyn- Battle axe
Manderly- Trident
Ryswell- Horses
Umber- Giant with shattered chains
Karstark- White sunburst on a black field
Bolton- Flayed Man
Tallhart- Pine trees I think
Flint- grey hand?
Locke- ?maybe a key
Mormont- Bear
Animals aren't particularly common, Mormonts live closer to the wall, there lordship is recent, might have been skinchangers in the past. Wouldn't bring bears into battle with them if they still are, warging is a sensitive subject even in the North.
Edited by jarl the climber, 21 January 2012 - 09:40 PM.
#37
Posted 27 February 2012 - 08:02 PM
Elaena Targaryen, on 13 January 2012 - 09:10 PM, said:
I love your entire post. That is the same thought process i have. What do you think about the new sample chapter, (if you have read it?) and what you were thinking about Theon? On a side note, I wonder if all of the wargs/skinchangers are going to end up on the Wall?
If anyone likes the idea of a northern conspiracy this thread helped my tie everything together...
http://asoiaf.wester...l-conspiration/
#38
Posted 27 February 2012 - 08:07 PM
#39
Posted 27 February 2012 - 08:26 PM
Free Northman, on 13 January 2012 - 01:25 PM, said:
I fail to see why they would be willing to swear to Stannis. I think they want to USE Stannis to get rid of the Boltons, and then when they have Winterfell back, to declare Robb's will and put Jon on the throne as King in the North.
They have no desire to swear to Stannis whatsoever. This is a fantasy dreamed up by Stannis supporters.
#40
Posted 27 February 2012 - 08:34 PM
Rhaegar Targaryen, on 27 February 2012 - 08:26 PM, said:
Yes it was; by the time Stannis arrived in the North, they were all dead. By the time they joined Stannis, I'd guess weeks or months had passed since he fought against Mance's "army" at the Wall.







