unJon, on 03 February 2012 - 11:32 PM, said:
My overall peeve is the conceit that 'humanoids' with the ability to cross-breed independently evolved on so many different worlds. It kills my suspension of disbelief, and in the first three novels at least, there isn't any explanation for why that would be true.
I think the ability to cross-breed with each other was due to genetic modifications being done to allow it. However, I do agree it's a bit implausible that there are so many species out there who are so similar to humans (especially when humans themselves aren't part of the Culture).
Quote
Anyway, given the above, do people think it is worth reading on? Is Use of Weapons the high point? Excession sounds interesting, but not available on Kindle. It takes a lot for me to actually buy a non Kindle book these days.
I think UoW was my favourite Culture book, like you I didn't think Consider Phlebas was all that great, but unlike you I did like Player of Games. I'd say they're all worth reading, but they do vary in quality. Unlike a conventional series they're all quite different books to each other (although there are some common themes), so it's difficult to predict which others you would like based on your reactions to the first three. For example, out of the next two books (in publication order)
Excession is space opera that is full of SF ideas and focuses more on the spaceships and A.I. members of the Culture with the humans being sidelined a bit but
Inversions is a complete contrast, being set entirely on one pre-Industrial planet with no spaceships or drones and no explicit mention of the Culture (although it's fairly clear a couple of characters originally came from there). Out of the other books, I'd say
Surface Detail is the one that's most like UoW, although it's not quite as great and it is a bit less focused - it does take a lot of time until the plot threads come together so I understand why some people have struggled with it.
ETA-
Quote
Consider Phlebas is flawed but certain aspects of my user profile would appear to indicate it holds a special place in my heart. Player of Games is somewhat better and Use of Weapons is clearly the masterpiece of MBank's early output. Min's distaste for Inversions is indicative of moral turpitude of the highest order, the weakest Culture book by far is Excession..
I have noticed there's no consensus on which Banks books are best or worst, there are even people who really don't like Use of Weapons but like some of the other books.
Edited by williamjm, 04 February 2012 - 08:05 AM.