#21
Posted 05 February 2012 - 11:40 AM
#22
Posted 05 February 2012 - 11:44 AM
"you think he is dead, Do you?" "you were right"
#24
Posted 05 February 2012 - 11:56 AM
#25
Posted 05 February 2012 - 11:58 AM
#26
Posted 05 February 2012 - 12:06 PM
Edited by just an Other, 05 February 2012 - 12:07 PM.
#27
Posted 05 February 2012 - 12:07 PM
On one hand, if he does go through some sort of revival/fake death..it would just be a repeat of what happened to previous characters, and most likely a lack a bit of impact. It would have to be something even more original or suprising in order to really prevent that.
On another hand, there is just so much left to his story and past that hasn't been covered. It would be odd if there was so much emphasis on his story and the mysteriousness of his identity just to have him knocked him off without nothing. If he is without question 100% dead, then we would have to depend on another character(s) to fill in some gaps, and those characters are either MIA or just has gossip as info. And assuming the whole R+L=J theory is true, it would turn obsolete...after all that effort with the war, the very young death of Lyanna and RhaeRhae, just to have Jon die at a young age himself? His parents died and Ned took him in so he could live.
I guess we shall see
#28
Posted 05 February 2012 - 12:16 PM
WenchofTarth, on 05 February 2012 - 11:31 AM, said:
Of course if he dies, it seems to me that there was a lot of buildup of his character with a lot of potential to lead somewhere epic in the plot (where upon he can die if need be) but in this circumstance its just foolish. Its like Tyrion suddenly dying of the bloody flux, a meaningless death.
I'm also wondering why everyone is assuming that Ser Gregor was brought back from the dead, there was no proof of that in aDwD, jut a slight assumption from a helmeted large man now with Ceresi. For that matter there was no real proof he actually died in the first place.
Lol I wouldn't be disappointed. I think it's kinda (very, actually) cheap to faux-kill him at this point.
To your point about Gregor -- I disagree. While it is certainly not stated anywhere that Gregor is Ser Robert Strong -- when you piece together everything in AFfC and ADwD concerning Gregor/Qyburn/Robert Strong, well, it seems like that is the only explanation. Of course Strong is going to be someone we know, it wouldn't be mysterious at all if he were just some random new character (one who just happens to be huge, and in cahoots with Qyburn). No mystery needed, just an introduction.
#29
Posted 05 February 2012 - 12:18 PM
WenchofTarth, on 05 February 2012 - 11:31 AM, said:
This.
I hope that his return will be well-written and that it wouldn't repeat any other resurrections; something that is a surprise rather than a widespread fan theory.
#30
Posted 05 February 2012 - 12:22 PM
WenchofTarth, on 05 February 2012 - 11:31 AM, said:
#31
Posted 05 February 2012 - 12:24 PM
I fully understand why people are over the whole 'Oh, I'm dead! J/K I'm not/ I was resurrected!' thing, but GRRM has invested too many pages and built too much mystery around this character to kill him off now.
I would rather deal with another undead character than having our dear Howland Reed appear someday saying 'Yeah, he was kind of Rhaegar's and Lyanna's son and rightful king...too bad you killed him back then, eh?', or having that never resolved.
But I have hope that he will recover without dying, and if he really does die he can be resurrected. Although I would hate it if Mel did the deed. I have this other crackpot theory on this but that would be too spoilery here...
#32
Posted 05 February 2012 - 12:24 PM
Val the Wildling Princess, on 05 February 2012 - 11:00 AM, said:
My point exactly!
#33
Posted 05 February 2012 - 12:25 PM
ipsuel, on 05 February 2012 - 12:16 PM, said:
To your point about Gregor -- I disagree. While it is certainly not stated anywhere that Gregor is Ser Robert Strong -- when you piece together everything in AFfC and ADwD concerning Gregor/Qyburn/Robert Strong, well, it seems like that is the only explanation. Of course Strong is going to be someone we know, it wouldn't be mysterious at all if he were just some random new character (one who just happens to be huge, and in cahoots with Qyburn). No mystery needed, just an introduction.
My thought exactly, he can die later if needed but now, in that way? Such an abrupt, pointless end after all the work on his character.
Well I'm willing to believe that Strong is actually Ser Gregor, just not that he is an UnGregor like many are suggesting. We are only told in the past that he is dying from the Viper's poison, we never get a death scene. I'd more rather take the position that Gregor was reinvented, especially now that two of teh Sand Snakes are coming to KL, it would be rather inconvenient if he was still alive heh.
#35
Posted 05 February 2012 - 12:28 PM
David Selig, on 05 February 2012 - 12:22 PM, said:
I'm not a fanboy fyi, I don't really have an emotional attachment to him, I just dislike the idea of him meeting his end in the way suggested here.
Now if they kill Brienne or Jaime... I'll be a bit more ticked
*shakes fist at the possibility*
Edited by WenchofTarth, 05 February 2012 - 12:28 PM.
#36
Posted 05 February 2012 - 12:51 PM
WenchofTarth, on 05 February 2012 - 12:25 PM, said:
Well I'm willing to believe that Strong is actually Ser Gregor, just not that he is an UnGregor like many are suggesting. We are only told in the past that he is dying from the Viper's poison, we never get a death scene. I'd more rather take the position that Gregor was reinvented, especially now that two of teh Sand Snakes are coming to KL, it would be rather inconvenient if he was still alive heh.
I could get on board with the reinvented thing for sure... In fact, I'd prefer it 10000% to an Un-Gregor.
I don't mind an 'Un-dead' character now and again, (after all, its a fantasy) but I think it's hard to walk the line between "well-written story, using un-dead characters once in a while" and "cheesy, cliche, predictable writing." And I'm of the opinion that GRRM *may* veer dangerously close to the latter.
#37
Posted 05 February 2012 - 01:01 PM
ipsuel, on 05 February 2012 - 12:51 PM, said:
I don't mind an 'Un-dead' character now and again, (after all, its a fantasy) but I think it's hard to walk the line between "well-written story, using un-dead characters once in a while" and "cheesy, cliche, predictable writing." And I'm of the opinion that GRRM *may* veer dangerously close to the latter.
That is why I do not think Martin will go there with Jon. Either one of two things happened in my opinion. Either Snow is badly wounded but not dead and Mel is able to heal him over time while Jon has some out of body experiences with Ghost ala Bran in a Game of Thrones. Or it was all a hoax and the Jon Snow that was stabbed was and illusion created by Mel and certain members of the Nightswatch was in on the hoax and carried away the fake body before it could be examined. Thus allowing Jon to leave the wall for a while and lead the Wildlings south to deal with the Boltons (who are a threat to the Night's Watch hence their motivation) and look for Arya (personal motivation).
Of course, that basically leaves the wall in control of Mel and very vulnerable to an attack by the Others.
Edited by Carey Wilson, 05 February 2012 - 01:02 PM.
#38
Posted 05 February 2012 - 01:01 PM
Martin tends not to give us back resurrected characters as "normal" versions of themselves, so I'm hoping that his death can be prevented in the first place. Like Dany, I'm not sure that Jon is going to draw the lesson that we'd want him to learn from this experience. Here's hoping he doesn't give himself over to vengeance and that he remembers he has a job to do.
#39
Posted 05 February 2012 - 01:06 PM
Carey Wilson, on 05 February 2012 - 01:01 PM, said:
Of course, that basically leaves the wall in control of Mel and very vulnerable to an attack by the Others.
From your mouth to GRRM's ears
#40
Posted 05 February 2012 - 01:09 PM
On the other hand, I do understand why some people think it would be a waste to have him just die after all the time invested in him- not to mention the presence of the warging at the start of ADwD- potential foreshadowing, maybe? I could live with Jon-as-Ghost, I actually think it would be quite interesting to read Jon in the body of Ghost becoming more wolflike. UnJon could also be interesting. But the "Not really dead after all!" has been used quite a lot in these books (Sandor just knocked Arya unconscious, Yoren was just cutting her hair, Asha was taken prisoner and knocked out, the Hound might still be alive on the Quiet Isle, etc.), and I can't tell you how irritated I would be if Jon magically got reborn as some sort of superhero.







