GoT opening chapter? Why Waymar?
#1
Posted 13 February 2012 - 09:41 AM
In the opening POV chapter it is established by Will that Waymar is a mere six months removed from taking the black. That he himself has been a ranger for four years and that Gared has FORTY YEARS of experience. So Waymar is not the commanding ranger by experience.
Now, one can assume that he is the appointed leader due to the fact that Waymar is coming from an ancient and noble house, has had years of tutelage in the arts of war and startegy etc. However, doesn't that conflict with the very vows of the NW? To forsake all land and titles? If those vows are to be held sacred than Waymar is the most novice and should be following not leading. Also, the Wildings fight with what I assume is disorganized and guerilla style warfare, I'm sure a departure from the organized formations and clashing of noble armies that Waymar was learned in (for proof of this, just Will's comment that the trees make for close fighting and a knife is better than a sword here shows Waymar's lack of understanding in the wooded combat the rangers engage in. Even the horse Waymar rides was an ignorant choice).
For me, that leads to only one logical explanation which is that Jeor Mormont gave the command to Royce. Why? He is green, by all accounts, and seemingly learned nothing during his training at Castle Black and was able to mask his arrogance well enough to be given a command.
It does seem that incoming noble born recruits are viewed as a commodity to be groomed for command, basically an OCS of sorts that produces officers who may be taksed with leading battled hardened veterans right out of West Point or a similar military academy. However, the current status of the NW, its depleted ranks, should argue against this line of thinking in the name of preserving numbers and ensuring the maximum amount of survivability. Excepting the Lord Commander, I had assumed that the NW was a meritocricy, that experience trumps high or low birth.
The fact that the NW perpetuates high/low born differences seems nonsensical and downright irresponsible. Now, if Gared was leading the ranging instead of Waymar there is no guarantee that the Others would not have got them. But, we do know the outcome of having Waymar lead the ranging.
While you certainly have to fault Royce for his decisions in the field on the ranging, I feel as if most of the blame should fall to Mormont, who had to have given the command to Waymar in hopes of his gaining experience. Instead, it is a folly that leads to the NW precious numbers dropping by three.
I was just wondering if my line of thinking is what others had when they read this opening chapter and if it dawned on them as well as being somewhat out of line with what the NW says it stands for.
#2
Posted 13 February 2012 - 09:56 AM
Maybe Mormont wasn't the one who gave Royce the lead, though. Benjen Stark was First Ranger.
#3
Posted 13 February 2012 - 10:12 AM
Ah well, old habits die hard I suppose.
#4
Posted 13 February 2012 - 10:31 AM
#5
Posted 13 February 2012 - 02:56 PM
Before and after this dialog, Mormont complains about the shrinking numbers of the Night's Watch and the quality of men. He also thinks himself too old, but dares not step down because he didn't think there was anyone of quality to hand the reigns over to. He says of Alliser Thorne and Bowen Marsh, "I would have to be as blind as Maester Aemon not to see what they are. The Night's Watch has become an army of sullen boys and tired old men." Near the end of the conversation he states that it is "...all we can do to stay alive."
I think Mormont made his decision based on fear. He wants more and better men sent to the Wall and doesn't want to discourage lords from sending them, and therefore allows Waymar to lead when Mormont knows he's not qualified. He tries to compensate Waymar's lack of experience by sending Gared. He sees that was a mistake now, and I believe that's why he seized upon Jon and made him his personal steward. Jon's leadership skills easily outshone anyone else and he's been providing quality instruction to the new recruits. I'm sure Jon was welcome relief to Mormont's worries.
#6
Posted 13 February 2012 - 03:08 PM
#7
Posted 13 February 2012 - 03:56 PM
#8
Posted 14 February 2012 - 04:15 AM
Perhaps it could have been the LC's intention to serve him an overdue lesson in humility that back fired a beauty. Send them out, let him carry on like he does, allow him to get beat good and proper and then come back?
As pointed out he hasn't taken his vows to set aside his past yet so perhaps this is why he is being treated as a better? We have seen how members of the NW still use appropriate titles etc with those who are not of the watch and I can envision Waymar reminding them all constantly of the fact that until he dons the black he is still better than them. Thats my best guess.
#9
Posted 14 February 2012 - 05:17 AM
Solaris, on 14 February 2012 - 04:15 AM, said:
Perhaps it could have been the LC's intention to serve him an overdue lesson in humility that back fired a beauty. Send them out, let him carry on like he does, allow him to get beat good and proper and then come back?
As pointed out he hasn't taken his vows to set aside his past yet so perhaps this is why he is being treated as a better? We have seen how members of the NW still use appropriate titles etc with those who are not of the watch and I can envision Waymar reminding them all constantly of the fact that until he dons the black he is still better than them. Thats my best guess.
That kid hadn't taken his vows? Really?
Anyway it seems to me that Night's Watch wasn't really that self-sufficient. Ben had to take a lot of supplies from Winterfel - crows, rations. I suspect they need those supplies from other great houses too. That's why Waymare got the privilege.
Edited by DirePenguin, 14 February 2012 - 05:20 AM.
#10
Posted 14 February 2012 - 05:41 AM
DirePenguin, on 14 February 2012 - 05:17 AM, said:
Anyway it seems to me that Night's Watch wasn't really that self-sufficient. Ben had to take a lot of supplies from Winterfel - crows, rations. I suspect they need those supplies from other great houses too. That's why Waymare got the privilege.
Quote
I want to agree with why he got special treatment but I keep coming back to the fact that Jon Snow didn't and everyone knew how much Ned Stark loved him... I don't know. So I will shut up now.
#11
Posted 14 February 2012 - 05:50 AM
Solaris, on 14 February 2012 - 05:41 AM, said:
Despite all the talk about equality, the Night's Watch is far from that. The noble born gets most of the command positions, especially among the rangers. The Old Bear, Benjen, Dennis Mallister. Jaremy Rykker, Toren Smallwood... Part of this is of course class discrimination, but thre's also another factor. The nobles at the wall are usually people who joined voluntarily or were forced to do it because they lost a war. The common born are almost all criminals. I know a brother's past and his crimes is supposed to be forgotten after he puts on the black, but surely most NW officers would rather put a volunteer in charge than a murderer or a rapist.
Edited by David Selig, 14 February 2012 - 06:01 AM.
#12
Posted 14 February 2012 - 05:54 AM
#13
Posted 14 February 2012 - 05:58 AM
David Selig, on 14 February 2012 - 05:50 AM, said:
Despite all the talk equality, the Night's Watch is far from that. The noble born gets most of the command positions, especially among the rangers. The Old Bear, Benjen, Dennis Mallister. Jaremy Rykker, Toren Smallwood...
As far as the daily routine goes Jon got no special treatment, in all fairness Jon did not know that he was being groomed for the LC position until Sam told him what the deal was with him being assigned to the stewards.
The fact we were given no inkling of special treatement through his POV points to well no special treatment. He certainly wasn't allowed to go lead brothers with zilch experience beyond the wall like Waymar, when Jon made it clear he really wanted to be a ranger. If Jon was being spoiled he would have told us about it and figured out without Sam's influence what Mormonts plan was...... IMO
#14
Posted 14 February 2012 - 06:03 AM
David Selig, on 14 February 2012 - 05:50 AM, said:
Despite all the talk equality, the Night's Watch is far from that. The noble born gets most of the command positions, especially among the rangers. The Old Bear, Benjen, Dennis Mallister. Jaremy Rykker, Toren Smallwood...
Cotter Pyke is an example of a low-born rising high. The Night's Watch is a shadow of its former self, they'll take anyone and prize those with nobility and honor. They are competent commanders and are well suited for the task, they do take away all lands and titles upon joining, but they cannot take away their experience in whichever field they were skilled in beforehand. Is it fair that Donal Noye became the armorer? Of course, since he was the best. It may not have been a meritocracy when they received the brunt of their training, but it was when deciding where they should go. List the Black Brothers and tell me that it's because of their low-birth instead of their incompetence that they don't have the positions that the former noble born do currently.
#15
Posted 14 February 2012 - 06:16 AM
Solaris, on 14 February 2012 - 05:58 AM, said:
The fact we were given no inkling of special treatement through his POV points to well no special treatment. He certainly wasn't allowed to go lead brothers with zilch experience beyond the wall like Waymar, when Jon made it clear he really wanted to be a ranger. If Jon was being spoiled he would have told us about it and figured out without Sam's influence what Mormonts plan was...... IMO
Waymar didn't lead brothers while in training either. Besides, Jon got picked for a crucial mission by the Halfhand (much more important than Waymar's routine check up) while less experienced than Waymar.
Quote
#16
Posted 14 February 2012 - 07:17 AM
David Selig, on 14 February 2012 - 06:16 AM, said:
Waymar didn't lead brothers while in training either. Besides, Jon got picked for a crucial mission by the Halfhand (much more important than Waymar's routine check up) while less experienced than Waymar.
I said what I said about leading in training because I misinterpreted Tylers meaning (see previous quote) it is what caught my interest. I cannot agree to assume any special treatment took place where there is no textual evidence to support the theory.
#17
Posted 14 February 2012 - 10:23 AM
#18
Posted 29 February 2012 - 01:54 AM
Edited by Howling4Reed, 29 February 2012 - 01:55 AM.
#19
Posted 29 February 2012 - 03:01 AM
Tyler Snow, on 13 February 2012 - 03:08 PM, said:
#20
Posted 03 March 2012 - 06:42 PM








