#221
Posted 25 February 2012 - 06:27 PM
#222
Posted 25 February 2012 - 06:31 PM
#224
Posted 25 February 2012 - 07:27 PM
sciborg2, on 25 February 2012 - 06:37 PM, said:
I admired him until I read his letter to the Holocaust victims. He was a great man, but that level of non-violence is just abhorrent to me. I shouldn't have called him an ass though. He was just a bit of a self-righteous jerk.
#225
Posted 25 February 2012 - 07:35 PM
People want white knight saviors, but the world doesn't work that way.
#226
Posted 25 February 2012 - 08:41 PM
TerraPrime, on 25 February 2012 - 06:15 PM, said:
There was a link in the Yahoo Ben & Jerry's story to the AAJA's guidelines for the media regarding covering Lin...
http://news.yahoo.co...-155822233.html
There is a direct reference in that guideline to fortune cookies...
Quote
And from the beginning of the Yahoo piece...
Quote
The limited-edition flavor, "Taste the Lin-Sanity," originally featured vanilla frozen yogurt, honey swirls and bits of fortune cookies, the latter ingredient serving as an obvious nod to Lin's heritage. After the backlash, the company pulled the cookies from the mix and replaced them with waffle cone pieces that will be served on the side.
"There seemed to be a bit of an initial backlash about it, but we obviously weren't looking to offend anybody and the majority of the feedback about it has been positive," Ryan Midden, the general manager of the Ben & Jerry's in Cambridge, Ma., told the Boston Globe.
I guess if you feel the need to make a distinction between that and "were there a group of Asian-Americans pressuring Ben and Jerry's to pull the product" then okay. You win. Some folks complained and they swapped ingredients.
And just to clarify, I'm glad that Ben and Jerry's changed the product. I think it was the classy thing to do. I'm just not sure that the initial complaint is a wholly reasonable one.
Edited by Manhole Eunuchsbane, 25 February 2012 - 09:35 PM.
#229
Posted 26 February 2012 - 01:00 PM
Nukelavee, on 25 February 2012 - 05:52 PM, said:
Tell me, with all this concern over how white folks are being racist here (although that assumes nobody involved with any of the problematic statements or gestures is any demographic besides white, which I highly doubt), what are your opinions on racism in Asia, or any country where whites are an absolute minority? Would you take up the good fight if it were, say, a Dutch man suddenly turning teh Sumo world on fire with his mad skillz?
Does racism only matter if it's us grinding you, or do you actually care about it when it's your own doing it to others? Would you care if it was a white poster discussing how he or she was treated while living in China, or would you shrug it off with the "hey, you guys are worse".
How about a black person on a job in Japan, or China?
This is what bothers me about when racism is a topic, the elephant in the room is that, certainly, in North America, it is whites who seem to be the worst offenders, but that racism exists everywhere, and god help anybody who thinks it's worth mentioning.
And, please, don't try to dodge the question with "But this is my home, this is where I should or must devote my attentions and energy", because it doesn't hold water.
To use the "racism is a disease" concept, why ignore pools of infection just because it's NIMBY?
Terra - you yourself mentioned collaboration between groups to fight it, but how can any of us work together if we don't look at our own people? If you deny the problem exists, or is worth worrying about, why bother speaking out ever?
I mean, maybe you are concerned with what I've pointed out, but, by being coy, you bring into question why avoid the big picture?
ME- glad I entertained you, even tho, wow, you seem to have a similar opinion of photoGate.
Does that make you feel better? And I'm curious what the hell the point of this post is, other than some kind of weird resentment about all this time spent discussing racism against Asians as if it has to be balanced with equal time complaints about the racism of Asians.
(Reposting something that was deleted because I was too free with my personal opinions of you...) By the way, I did read the submission guidelines you link on the Yahoo contributors section. It doesn't matter though -- no major web provider would ever allow any contributors to post directly without editorial oversight. It's something that is basic to the survival of the organization and no one should have to read a guidelines section to realize that any submitted content would be reviewed before posting. The fact that you didn't even read everything fully in the links you yourself posted, said things like "I don't think Yahoo has enough editorial staff to read over every submission" and got surprised by Wolf Maid's post of the guidelines is pretty funny after you keep whining about how I didn't read -- which it turns out you were wrong about, again.
By the way, nice work being the guy who accuses people of knee-jerk response in a racism thread.
Edited by DanteGabriel, 26 February 2012 - 01:09 PM.
#231
Posted 26 February 2012 - 01:28 PM
The 3 examples in the opening post are not racist, as far as I'm concerned. They are trivial, sometimes joking, references to ethnicity, with the exception of "Chink in the armour" which may not even have been that.
I'm constantly baffled by America's attitude to race, you have a large black underclass who you pretend have equality of opportunity despite the fact your best universities charge massive fees to get in, and who wouldn't get in anyway cause their schools are so poor. Then you freak out because somebody observes than Oriental (not offensive in England, Asian means something else here) people have different shaped eyes. Then the same people who freaked out sit down and watch Family Guy and South Park, which make exactly the same kind of joke and laugh their heads off.
BTW I'm a commited anti-racist and have been on many demos and leafleting campains against the BNP and EDL.
#233
Posted 26 February 2012 - 01:33 PM
We've had 50 threads on why Oriental is offensive, at least in the US context.
I'm pretty sure I can draw a Venn diagram about people who laugh their heads off at South Park/Family Guy and that other thing you just said. Anyway, the context of humor needs to be taken into account. Does this really need to be explained?
#235
Posted 26 February 2012 - 01:34 PM
#238
Posted 26 February 2012 - 01:45 PM
IheartTesla, on 26 February 2012 - 01:33 PM, said:
And do they have more affirmative action/cheap tuition students than students from wealthy background who have bought entry through private schooling starting at age 5?
IheartTesla, on 26 February 2012 - 01:33 PM, said:
I disagree. Family Guy is constantly described as a liberal show (I'm not a liberal by the way, they are far too right wing for me), and it is aimed at a media-savvy left-ish young urban audience. Exactly the same people who laugh at family guy´s racial jokes agonise about whether the man over there is black or wearing a red tie. How do you know that these guys were not playing with racial stereotypes for humourous effect rather than displaying "racist" attitudes?
Anyway, the only real shame in this is that a man has lost his job... and I love the comments writing off the fact he's married to an Asian, as if familiarity and respect for a culture can be no excuse for transgressing the RULES of public discourse.
Edited by str8 outta Old Town, 26 February 2012 - 01:46 PM.
#239
Posted 26 February 2012 - 01:47 PM
#240
Posted 26 February 2012 - 01:48 PM
peterbound, on 26 February 2012 - 01:40 PM, said:
This is what I mean, I write a whole post attacking racism in America, and I get called a racist because I don't fall over in a paroxysm of mock horror when someone says the word "slanty".






This topic is locked

