Fragile Bird, on 25 February 2012 - 04:55 PM, said:
And I thought really good points were made regarding Joffrey's education, or lack of, and the lack of the companionship of boys his own age. The latter is a striking point - why wouldn't other noble families have offered sons as companions. Surely this would be an honour people would relish for their sons. Would Robert or Cersei have refused such offers?
And in the real world, I've read lots of stories of princes being raised by tutors that have strong disciplinary powers over their young princes. Someone commented that Robert really wouldn't have a role in raising his son, and on reflection, I think I'd agree. I think royal families hire the best tutors - for classic education, swordmanship, riding, dancing, manners etc - and leave the kid in the schoolroom til they're old enough to come out and look like a polished, suave princeling.
And for the psychology buffs, are you familiar with a Canadian book that is apparently the seminal text on how serial killers turned out the way they did: Hunting Humans, The Rise of the Modern Multiple Murderer, by Elliott Leyton. I gather it's required reading for many police forces everywhere these days.
I haven't read that book, but I'm definitely going to look into it. I'm on a police studies degree so that will be very interesting!
I made a point about Robert not raising Joffrey - as a big fan of historical fiction (and then learning the facts afterwards sometimes

), namely Tudor/Plantagenet/Victorian times, it was definitely the case that children were left in the schoolroom under the supervision of tutors and governesses and only brought out for meal times and family occasions (if you're a fan of Victorian times, a very good modern-yet-pretty-historically-correct novel is The Crimson Petal and The White by Michel Faber. Love it!). This is why I mentioned it, because parents, fathers in particular, rarely had a hand in bringing up the children, except to perhaps discipline them in severe circumstances. It wasn't excusing Roberts' behaviour or lack of parenting skills, but just pointing out that it is not like modern times, where we expect the father to be there and do just as much as the mother when bringing up the children.
I think that not many other families particularly liked the Lannisters, which might be why Joffrey, Tommen and Myrcella were not fostered or brought up with other children, but I also put it down to Cersei wanting to keep her children, particularly Joffrey, ridiculously close to her, so she could raise him in the way
she saw fit, without any outside influence. Without repeating my arguments about Cersei, this is just one of the reasons why I blame her more for the way Joffrey turned out - she alone pretty much had the influence over him, and look how he turned out? I know Roberts' neglect played an equal part, but Cersei actively, I think, poisoned Joffrey, whereas Roberts' failing to act and influence him had a different adverse effect. If that makes any sense whatsoever.
@FanTasy - thanks for that, I thought it rang a bell.