Mafia 88: Glimmers of the Pattern
#321
Posted 06 March 2012 - 10:25 AM
19 players remain: Aviendha., Cadsuane Melaidhrin, Egwene al'Vere, Elayne Trakand, Faile Bashere, Galad Damodred, Gawyn Trakand, Lan Mandragoran, Logain Ablar, Loial, Mat Cauthon, Min Farshaw, Moiraine Damodred, Nynaeve al'Meara, Perrin Aybara, Siuan Sanche, Thom Merrilin, Tuon, Verin Mathwin.
10 votes are needed for a conviction or 10 to go to night.
4 votes for Elayne Trakand (Moiraine Damodred, Aviendha., Verin Mathwin, Faile Bashere)
3 votes for Loial (Mat Cauthon, Elayne Trakand, Gawyn Trakand)
2 votes for Siuan Sanche (Tuon, Min Farshaw)
2 votes for Egwene al'Vere (Cadsuane Melaidhrin, Galad Damodred)
2 votes for Gawyn Trakand (Lan Mandragoran, Nynaeve al'Meara)
2 votes for Moiraine Damodred (Egwene al'Vere, Siuan Sanche)
1 vote for Cadsuane Melaidhrin (Logain Ablar)
1 vote for Logain Ablar (Perrin Aybara)
2 players have not voted: Thom Merrilin, Loial.
#323
Posted 06 March 2012 - 10:27 AM
I have meetings most of the day then it should clear up going into the evening. But for now, I just did a reread of Elayne giving her vote total and I'm of two minds. Yes, I understand this is wishy washy but I want discussion at this point, not a lynch.
1. I actually think her catch up post was fine in isolation. It had no opinions except for Loial but at that point, there wasn't a ton happening. The only real thing going on was Faile's questioning of me and Loial's change of opinion on voting. She also isn't knew and has to understand that throwing out crap content for the sake of content rarely ever works. So to me, it's a point in her favor.
2. A point against is that she has done nothing but defend herself and defend her vote on Loial since. I haven't read one thing where she's actually tried to find FM (though she has said 3 people are scummy) even while she was active nor have I read anything where she's added to her case on Loial. She has defended the vote and tried to dispute the fact that he's an easy target but nothing really else.
Elayne: do you still have the same opinions of Loial as you did earlier in the game? Why do you think Faile and Verin are scummy? Has anyone else caught your eye?
Next post will be in an hour and half or so.
#325
Posted 06 March 2012 - 10:39 AM
Siuan Sanche, on 05 March 2012 - 10:44 PM, said:
I see many people wanted to hop on a wagon based on an accusation based on a joke vote. Really? I know we are trying to scum hunt, but wagons based on joke votes usually don't fall under the informed decisions category.
That being said I believe I'm going to vote for Moiraind, she/he (it?) seems to want just any lynch for no apparent reason. Not really informative and slightly scummy.
I'll have to try and read again when I find the time, so I can make more informed decisions. Although with so many people I don't think I'll be able to get much. I can't keep track of all this as much as I would like. Guess I'll have to get used to all of you.
In before anyone asks why I haven't actually voted for Loial yet. My vote's been sitting on Siuan for a while now. She's posted all of twice since I placed it, with the above being the most substantial contribution, if you can call it that. "Blah blah blah, I'm coasting and throwing out another easy vote." I don't feel the slightest bit better about her, and am happy with my vote where it is pending Loial's promised morning re-read.
#326
Posted 06 March 2012 - 10:42 AM
Galad Damodred, on 06 March 2012 - 10:02 AM, said:
Min is hard to read. I feel like for a player who comes off as brash, he's been somewhat low-key. (Edit: I'm not explaining what I mean well.)
Ya know, I still don't like that. I could go into a very specific reason why, but it's in squirrel territory. So I won't. I've reread you twice this morning and came up with a null though, so I'm letting it slide for the time being.
#329
Posted 06 March 2012 - 10:48 AM
unvote
Egwene al, on 06 March 2012 - 10:19 AM, said:
Do you disagree that Moiraine's play is not useful for finding scum, or do you agree but don't like me pointing it out? What specifically do you disagree with of what I've said?
I think occasionally, not explaining your thoughts can be more effective at getting reads than explaining them (although I'm not fond of the "never explain yourself ever" playstyle). I also think that in Moiraine's case, he would probably play exactly the same regardless of his alignment (so maybe me leaning innocent on him is hasty). But anyway, it's a not uncommon playstyle that works for some people, so lecturing someone about that is somewhat easy--I doubt he'll oblige you.
And yes, in general, I don't see your point of view most of the time. I already said I think clearing someone for voting someone solely for having posted only once is silly. Off the top of my head, another one is that I don't think Logain was "bullying" Tuon.
Re: your post on Mat, there's actually one thing I agree with: Mat never actually said that he cross-posted--in fact, his answer implies that he was going to cast a joke vote for me and then change it to Loial
(Edit: I swear, half of what comes out of my keyboard sometimes is completely nonsensical.)
Edited by Galad Damodred, 06 March 2012 - 10:53 AM.
#330
Posted 06 March 2012 - 10:54 AM
Siuan Sanche, on 05 March 2012 - 01:53 PM, said:
Verin Mathwin, I was really tempted to vote you. But I had already copy/pasted Nynaeve al'Meara's name and I had done it since the first page.
Siuan Sanche, on 05 March 2012 - 10:44 PM, said:
I see many people wanted to hop on a wagon based on an accusation based on a joke vote. Really? I know we are trying to scum hunt, but wagons based on joke votes usually don't fall under the informed decisions category.
That being said I believe I'm going to vote for Moiraind, she/he (it?) seems to want just any lynch for no apparent reason. Not really informative and slightly scummy.
I'll have to try and read again when I find the time, so I can make more informed decisions. Although with so many people I don't think I'll be able to get much. I can't keep track of all this as much as I would like. Guess I'll have to get used to all of you.
Siuan is willing to vote for Moraine, without even considering her motives for the Elayne-vote or asking her for that. It's just too easy to deal with the Elayne summary-post -> Moraine's instant vote. So accusing people (who try to create content by building cases on joke votes) for making uninformed descisions, but voting Moraine without asking her something? Also "slightly" scummy rubs me the wrong way. You have nothing to go on in Moraine's case. Either you find that playstyle scum/anti-town. Or you don't. This "slightly" leaves Siuan an out in case the tide changes, imo.
Siuan Sanche, on 05 March 2012 - 10:51 PM, said:
So, I think she is the lowest contributor so far and a good choice to lynch early.
#331
Posted 06 March 2012 - 10:56 AM
Mat Cauthon, on 06 March 2012 - 10:27 AM, said:
I have meetings most of the day then it should clear up going into the evening. But for now, I just did a reread of Elayne giving her vote total and I'm of two minds. Yes, I understand this is wishy washy but I want discussion at this point, not a lynch.
1. I actually think her catch up post was fine in isolation. It had no opinions except for Loial but at that point, there wasn't a ton happening. The only real thing going on was Faile's questioning of me and Loial's change of opinion on voting. She also isn't knew and has to understand that throwing out crap content for the sake of content rarely ever works. So to me, it's a point in her favor.
2. A point against is that she has done nothing but defend herself and defend her vote on Loial since. I haven't read one thing where she's actually tried to find FM (though she has said 3 people are scummy) even while she was active nor have I read anything where she's added to her case on Loial. She has defended the vote and tried to dispute the fact that he's an easy target but nothing really else.
Elayne: do you still have the same opinions of Loial as you did earlier in the game? Why do you think Faile and Verin are scummy? Has anyone else caught your eye?
Next post will be in an hour and half or so.
Faile has bad logic, but it's possible it's just bad logic town.
"
He was accusing Loial of changing his mind quickly about the voting when he was doing the same. When I questioned him about it he admited he was being a hypocrite."
^I mean look at this, I can't fathom how a normal person can complete ignore Loial's action which made the described action reasonable.
Verrin hasn't really done anything except question me. The "scummy" was from their complete avoidance of the early game, instead opting to post a poem instead of posting content. Verrin is more reasonable then Faile though.
#332
Posted 06 March 2012 - 10:56 AM
Loial, on 06 March 2012 - 10:45 AM, said:
Min Farshaw, on 06 March 2012 - 10:42 AM, said:
#336
Posted 06 March 2012 - 11:09 AM
Right now, I think my ranking goes Siuan > Loial > Elayne of the wagons now (although I hate that Loial hasn't delivered his reread). I agree with Min's and Thom's case on Siuan, so I won't repeat them.
I'm debating a Siuan vote, but I want to reread a dark horse suspect first.
#338
Posted 06 March 2012 - 11:17 AM
Elayne Trakand, on 06 March 2012 - 10:56 AM, said:
"
He was accusing Loial of changing his mind quickly about the voting when he was doing the same. When I questioned him about it he admited he was being a hypocrite."
^I mean look at this, I can't fathom how a normal person can complete ignore Loial's action which made the described action reasonable.
I'm not going to insist on explaining my point of view on this anymore, it would be a waste of time. But, I still want to defend that my question was as valid as any other and it didn't lack logic. I think Mat would (or should have) told us if I was misinterpreting his actions, but he didn't so... yeah...
Also, "normal" is overrated.
#340
Posted 06 March 2012 - 11:19 AM
Loial got my attention, because I thought he seemed less noob then he claimed to be. Also, his observation of the inquisition game is from my POV wrong (the conclusion definitly is, and would be harder to draw from that game, than from another, imo). Also he lurked through the discussion of Elayne's catch up post, which were about him a lot.
So after his OMGUS vote on Galan, this is pretty much all he says
The following bothers me as well: It's an excuse for not posting (though he did answer questions as seen above). He was also asked to post more instead of less, but doesn't - when you are trying to figure out how to play, listen to the advices?
Loial, on 05 March 2012 - 06:57 PM, said:
Loial, on 06 March 2012 - 10:45 AM, said:
Reply to this topic
Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: mafia, wheel of time
Miscellaneous →
Forum Games →
Mafia 89 - The King in Dragonstone STARTS 3/26Started by House Targaryen , 19 Mar 2012 |
|
|
||
Miscellaneous →
Forum Games →
Mafia Mini 87.5 - Trouble at Wittlich - Game Ended.Started by Zar Lannister , 26 Feb 2012 |
|
|
||
Miscellaneous →
Forum Games →
Mafia 86 - Agendas Game ThreadStarted by House Targaryen , 24 Jan 2012 |
|
|
||
Miscellaneous →
Forum Games →
Mafia 85: The Nightmare After ChristmasStarted by House Targaryen , 26 Dec 2011 |
|
|
||
Mafia
Miscellaneous →
Forum Games →
Mafia Game 83: Day 3Started by House Targaryen , 21 Nov 2011 |
|
|






