US Politics: 1950's edition
#301
Posted 08 March 2012 - 02:03 PM
#302
Posted 08 March 2012 - 02:10 PM
Arthmail, on 08 March 2012 - 11:48 AM, said:
I'd love to - the Iraq War is high on the list of things I don't want to have paid for either. While we're at it, can we get reimbursed for the War on Drugs?
#303
Posted 08 March 2012 - 02:14 PM
Tormund Midgetsbane, on 08 March 2012 - 01:34 PM, said:
Gun Control: AKA We win, you fuckers
12 States on the path to eliminate carry permit requirements
Wyoming just passed, South Dakota is just waiting on the Governor's signature, New Hampshire has passed in the House.
Federal judge rules "may issue" permits unconstitutional in Maryland
The Brady Campaign is broke, and only has one supporter
They only raised $7500 in 2010, compared to $1.7 million ten years prior.
California, New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts, and Illinois: Just give it up already. We win, you lose.
/gloat
Maryland's concealed carry permit law has been overturned, but it is being appealed by the State and they have asked that the law stay in place while it is appealed. But it is a little bit closer
eta: and since I almost never click links I missed you had the MD info already. sorry
Edited by Ser Lany Cassandra, 08 March 2012 - 02:15 PM.
#304
Posted 08 March 2012 - 02:19 PM
Quote
DG just did, and does frequently (among others).
#305
Posted 08 March 2012 - 02:21 PM
#306
Posted 08 March 2012 - 02:32 PM
Quote
That's the going theory, although it seems to be an odd thing to bring up in response to gun control being dramatically reduced in the US.
#307
Posted 08 March 2012 - 02:33 PM
#308
Posted 08 March 2012 - 02:36 PM
Tormund Midgetsbane, on 08 March 2012 - 02:32 PM, said:
#309
Posted 08 March 2012 - 02:44 PM
Apparently it's a Super-PAC created with the purpose of targeting weak incumbents, no matter what party they are (though primary financing from the PAC comes from Republicans in Texas).
They are crowing about their first victory: incumbent Ohio Rep Jean Schmidt lost her primary battle after they spent more than $200,000 in ads targeting her.
I've gotta say I'm conflicted. It's great that someone besides a comedian is using the PACs to point out their power, and I think many political incumbents are some of the worst of Americans, but it's a little disturbing that a few rich people in Texas can use their money to help win an election in Ohio.
ETA:
And despite the GOP getting bitchslapped for their recent anti-woman stances, the hits keep on coming:
Arizona Senate passes bill allowing doctors to not inform women of prenatal problems if the doctor thinks it can lead to an abortion.
That's right, if this gets signed into law, your doctor could be legally free to withhold information from you to keep you from making a 100% informed decision. If you die because of complications in your pregnancy, complications that could have easily been prevented or solved to result in both a healthy fetus and mother but never were even mentioned because the asshole doctor thinks you will have an abortion... he walks away free and clear.
Fuck the GOP. Seriously. Fuck them.
Edited by awesome possum, 08 March 2012 - 02:51 PM.
#310
Posted 08 March 2012 - 02:45 PM
RWHamel, on 08 March 2012 - 02:33 PM, said:
What are you even talking about here?
The Left supports policies to help the poor.
What they complain about is when the "rugged individualists" who claim not to need government aid and want to cut that aid are themselves some of the largest recipients of said aid.
#311
Posted 08 March 2012 - 02:45 PM
Quote
They're just the states with the most restrictive gun laws is all. I thought it was common knowledge (Illinois is the only state that doesn't even issue carry permits, although in function, none of the others do either.)
#312
Posted 08 March 2012 - 02:47 PM
Tormund Midgetsbane, on 08 March 2012 - 02:45 PM, said:
Probably only if you give much of a shit about gun rights.
If you don't have guns or care about them, you likely wouldn't know.
#313
Posted 08 March 2012 - 02:47 PM
awesome possum, on 08 March 2012 - 02:44 PM, said:
You so silly.
This is Democracy at work!
Why should we expect average-income residents in Ohio should get a larger say on who's elected to represent them than million-dollar rich Texans? Besides, we don't want to trample the free speech right of these rich Texan, now would we? You're just not American enough. AP.
#314
Posted 08 March 2012 - 03:08 PM
#315
Posted 08 March 2012 - 03:09 PM
http://www.thisameri...kind-of-country
Edited by lockesnow, 08 March 2012 - 03:10 PM.
#316
Posted 08 March 2012 - 03:19 PM
Tormund Midgetsbane, on 08 March 2012 - 02:45 PM, said:
I kind of thought that was obvious in the context of your posts. The responses made no sense to me at first either. Glad we figured out that they apparently thought you were just telling liberal yuppie states to fuck off.
A lot of people - anyone who has no interest in owning a gun - just isn't going to understand this issue and what a freaking pain in the ass keeping up with the morass of gun laws and licenses and registrations and whatever else really is. Most of them should be void for vagueness.
Thanks again lupis for making that clear to me in some earlier incarnation of this thread.
#317
Posted 08 March 2012 - 03:23 PM
awesome possum, on 08 March 2012 - 02:44 PM, said:
Arizona Senate passes bill allowing doctors to not inform women of prenatal problems if the doctor thinks it can lead to an abortion.
That's right, if this gets signed into law, your doctor could be legally free to withhold information from you to keep you from making a 100% informed decision. If you die because of complications in your pregnancy, complications that could have easily been prevented or solved to result in both a healthy fetus and mother but never were even mentioned because the asshole doctor thinks you will have an abortion... he walks away free and clear.
Fuck the GOP. Seriously. Fuck them.
WHAT?!?
Okay, that's not what it says. Here is the text of the bill:
http://www.azleg.gov...&Session_ID=107
There is this thing called a wrongful birth suit. In most states, it's not allowed anyway. It's basically where you give birth to a child with Down's Syndrome and then sue your doctor for the additional costs that will incurred by your child because you would have aborted the child if you knew about the defect.
I have no problem with banning wrongful birth suits - there are not allowed most places anyway.
That's all the bill does. If you die or suffer injury during childbirth because the doctor withheld information, you can still sue his ass off for that.
Really bad reporting there.
#318
Posted 08 March 2012 - 03:26 PM
Raidne, on 08 March 2012 - 03:19 PM, said:
#319
Posted 08 March 2012 - 03:29 PM
#320
Posted 08 March 2012 - 03:30 PM
Typical Woman, on 08 March 2012 - 02:47 PM, said:
You so silly.
This is Democracy at work!
Why should we expect average-income residents in Ohio should get a larger say on who's elected to represent them than million-dollar rich Texans? Besides, we don't want to trample the free speech right of these rich Texan, now would we? You're just not American enough. AP.
I know, I occasionally tell myself I should have been born a Canadian, but I can't do it. I'm too much of a ""meh" guy and not enough of an "eh?" guy.
Raidne, on 08 March 2012 - 03:23 PM, said:
Okay, that's not what it says. Here is the text of the bill:
http://www.azleg.gov...&Session_ID=107
It doesn't specify DS though, it says any birth defect or medical condition that was withheld from the parent to prevent an abortion:
This section applies to any claim regardless of whether the child is born healthy or with a birth defect or other adverse medical condition
And sure, they can sue, but that doctor will not face any criminal charges or face the prospect of losing their medical license.
lockesnow, on 08 March 2012 - 03:09 PM, said:
http://www.thisameri...kind-of-country
Speaking of Norquist, sounds like his idiotic pledge is finally starting to crumble around the edges:
Quote
Today, Norquist lost another devotee, with Rep. Timothy Johnson (R-IL) saying that while he signed the pledge for his first election, he now considers Norquist’s stance “disingenuous and irresponsible“:






This topic is locked
