Bayard, on 04 April 2012 - 01:37 PM, said:
How the frak did Ned tear down the TOJ?
#41
Posted 04 April 2012 - 01:59 PM
#42
Posted 04 April 2012 - 02:04 PM
kapulani, on 04 April 2012 - 12:04 PM, said:
I think he might not've been able to, say, turn the ToJ completely to water, but I think he could've damaged the supports such that it collapsed, and then the two could move a few stones to make cairns for the corpses.
Excellent point, I like that thought kapulani. And, first post! Welcome to Westeros!
#43
Posted 04 April 2012 - 02:14 PM
Bayard, on 04 April 2012 - 01:37 PM, said:
Also, where and with whom could Ned have stashed an unweaned Jon? Now look how far the Tower of Joy is from where we know Ned to have brought Dawn. An unweaned infant could never have survived even that far without a wetnurse, let alone back to Winterfell. We know that Ser Arthur Dayne was Rhaegar Targaryen’s best friend and most loyal companion, so it is likely that his Arthur’s sister Ashara was somehow in on it all, too — whatever “it” might be.
I don’t know how just a bunch of titless men could have kept a nursing infant alive for that far. Captive goat? Maybe, but I doubt it.
#44
Posted 04 April 2012 - 02:52 PM
Bayard, on 04 April 2012 - 01:37 PM, said:
Ned took all the men he trusted the most with him on the first trip to the ToJ. He would have had to tear it down and build the cairns before he went to SF. He returned to WF after he left SF. The only way he could have gotten around the young babe would be for him to send it on to ST with its wet nurse, and him come after he is finished at the tower. But this brings up the question of how he knew he would be able to get he baby back once it was inside SF.
#45
Posted 04 April 2012 - 02:59 PM
Hyper, on 04 April 2012 - 11:01 AM, said:
Some of it has to be of literal narrative value though, or else all of it is suspect, and then why the hell are we even discussing it?
Martin has said that some of it is symbolic, yes. My bet is that the storm of blue rose petals is probably Ned's imagination, as is Lyanna calling her brother by his full name (which actually turns out to be the steward). The basic structure of events — Ned and Co. rode up, fought the Kingsguard, Ned and Howland survived — is probably legit.
CrypticWeirwood, on 04 April 2012 - 02:14 PM, said:
Wylla.
I think she was at the Tower, she's the one who delivered Jon and nursed him after Lyanna died.
Edited by Apple Martini, 04 April 2012 - 03:00 PM.
#46
Posted 04 April 2012 - 03:29 PM
Apple Martini, on 04 April 2012 - 02:59 PM, said:
I think she was at the Tower, she's the one who delivered Jon and nursed him after Lyanna died.
It's certainly possible that Wylla was at the ToJ to be a wetnurse to Jon because that was normal among noble women but I just think (for no reason really - just a gut feeling) Ned picked up Jon and Wylla in Starfall and then took ship north. I think that may be where the whole "fisherman's daughter" story may come from
Also, in terms of pulling down the ToJ, as others have pointed out, I think it was small and in bad shape already. And, I'm no engineer, but even I know pulling walls outward (especially curved walls as with a round tower) is generally easier than pushing them inward. I think Ned and Howland could have done it with some ropes and a few of the horses they had. I also alternatively could easily buy Howland magicking some of the base stones to mud. That'd bring a tower down pretty fast!
#47
Posted 04 April 2012 - 03:48 PM
Prince of the North, on 04 April 2012 - 03:29 PM, said:
It's certainly possible that Wylla was at the ToJ to be a wetnurse to Jon because that was normal among noble women but I just think (for no reason really - just a gut feeling) Ned picked up Jon and Wylla in Starfall and then took ship north. I think that may be where the whole "fisherman's daughter" story may come from
A few things that don't add up here.
1. The Kingsguard would have gone with Jon if he had already been moved. Going on the R+L=J theory, he's the reason they're there at the Tower at all. One or two might have stayed behind to "bring up the rear" (which I don't believe either), but at least one would have gone on to Starfall with him if they had moved him. The fact that they're still at the Tower — all three of them — when Ned arrives means that Jon himself was still there, too.
2. Someone had to have been there to deliver the baby and act as a backup wet nurse in case Lyanna died (which she did). Wylla makes the most sense; she's "in on it" herself, given that she's corroborated Ned's cover story.
3. They found Ned in Lyanna's room. By this time, the Kingsguard and Ned's five other companions are already dead and Ned is in Lyanna's room. They is plural (and yes I know it can be used [incorrectly] in singular form, but if it was meant to be singular, Martin could've just said "Reed found him," given that we already know Howland was there). So who else would have been there besides Howland to find Ned in Lyanna's room? The wet nurse/midwife maybe?
4. No indication that Wylla ever went up north with Jon when Ned sent him back to Winterfell. It seems like she went back to Starfall when Ned took Dawn back and caught a ship, and Ned installed a different wet nurse at Winterfell for Jon. The fisherman's daughter story that Davos hears is a 100% gossipy red herring.
Edited by Apple Martini, 04 April 2012 - 03:49 PM.
#48
Posted 05 April 2012 - 12:25 AM
Prince of the North, on 04 April 2012 - 03:29 PM, said:
The tower doesn't really have to be in bad shape. If you have enough firewood and combustable material present you could burn the whole world down. Look at the Two Towers in NY City. It took only a few hours to turn them into rubble and ash.
Even if there was no dragonfire (dynamite) stashed in the basement somewhere - there would usually be a couple of tons of firewood stacked somewhere for everyday heating and cooking. I'm living in a modern house and I've got a ton of firewood stacked in my garage for my fireplace - and gasoline for my mower and garden equipment nearby. If I wanted to burn the whole place down its dead easy.
Medieval towers also usually have a wooden frame to act as the skeleton brace of the building structure - if you start a fire with the (presumed) firewood in the cellar kitchen downstairs in the basement - it won't take too long to get a roaring inferno going. The tower structure would act as a chimney too - once the wooden frame starts burning up, the tower's bluestone block walls will start shifting and eventually the whole edifice will start crumbling down.
Edited by lyvyathan, 05 April 2012 - 11:10 AM.
#49
Posted 05 April 2012 - 12:27 AM
Apple Martini, on 04 April 2012 - 03:48 PM, said:
4. No indication that Wylla ever went up north with Jon when Ned sent him back to Winterfell. It seems like she went back to Starfall when Ned took Dawn back and caught a ship, and Ned installed a different wet nurse at Winterfell for Jon. The fisherman's daughter story that Davos hears is a 100% gossipy red herring.
I agree with what you say - but the fisherman's daughter doesn't have to be a red herring, maybe it could be a mackerel or tuna fish.
Or it could simply be a girl who is dragged along the journey to provide milk for the baby. Doesn't have to be just Wylla.
#50
Posted 05 April 2012 - 09:22 AM
Bayard, on 04 April 2012 - 01:37 PM, said:
Why would Ned need to take it down at all? To end it all there, to burry all the traces of what happened.
But if he was good with riding around, fetching people and involving them, then why not send the bodies of the fallen to their families? Why draw unwanted attention?
But the question is really great. Even if he had a hundred horses, it would have been dangerous, because the horses would have brought that tower on themselves and all the scattering stones would make it impossible to be safe. Fire seems plausible explanation, but Ned gives no hint at it at all. Maybe Howland really can do things?
#51
Posted 05 April 2012 - 09:46 AM
If Rhaegar was going through the trouble of protecting his unborn son with 3 of his 7 personal KG, then surely he would provide assistance to bring him into this world as well... I presume that not only would a wet nurse be with her, but also a servant, and perhaps even a maester, we are talking about royalty after all...
This was something that I hadn't thought of before. I'll have to read through the section again to see if I can catch any other foreshadowing......because eventually GrrM will tell us.
#52
Posted 05 April 2012 - 10:18 AM
Once the deed was done, Ned probably buried the bodies or boiled them to take the bones with him, destroyed or burned any dangerous proof he didn´t wanted to be found and told the peasants to tear down the TOJ in the name of the new king (and they obeyed because they figured Ned, who had come and killed half the kingsguard had to be a big cheese)
#53
Posted 05 April 2012 - 10:48 AM
Apple Martini, on 04 April 2012 - 03:48 PM, said:
1. The Kingsguard would have gone with Jon if he had already been moved. Going on the R+L=J theory, he's the reason they're there at the Tower at all. One or two might have stayed behind to "bring up the rear" (which I don't believe either), but at least one would have gone on to Starfall with him if they had moved him. The fact that they're still at the Tower — all three of them — when Ned arrives means that Jon himself was still there, too.\
Well, another explanation could be that the 3 KG thought they could defeat the intruders (these are three very confident warriors after all) but they hedged their bet, so to speak, by sending Ashara ahead with the baby just in case. Either way they could have felt the delaying tactic worthwhile. If they all had taken off there would have been the very real possibility of being overtaken by Ned and company because they would simply not be able to travel as fast with a newborn.
Also, I agree that Jon is the reason the KG are at the ToJ but I don't believe the fact that Jon is an/the heir to the throne isthe main reason the KG were at the ToJ. I believe the foremost reason Dayne, at least, was with Rhaegar was his belief in what Rhaegar was trying to accomplish - fulfilling the prophecy. I think Rhaegar's belief that Jon would be the Third Head of the Dragon was far more important to him and, thus, his "inner circle" (of which Arthur and Ashara Dayne, at least, were members) than the fact that he would be in line for the throne. Now, as for Whent and Hightower - take your pick. They could have also been part of Rhaegar's "cult of personality" or they could have been there out of simple loyalty to Rhaegar or Dayne or whatever. We have some allusion to a schism between Aerys and Rhaegar through his conversation with Jaime about deposing the King. Could the KG have felt they needed to choose sides? Also, the KG may very well have not all arrived at the same time. Maybe one or both of Whent and Hightower showed up later to bring word, etc.?
Another thing that has always puzzled me is, if the KG were at the ToJ only because R+L's baby would be heir to the throne (I'm not saying you said this), how did they know the baby would be a boy? Or maybe they knew that Rhaegar's first two children were already dead so no matter if R+L's baby were a boy or girl the child would still be heir to the throne? Ah, what a great mystery
Apple Martini, on 04 April 2012 - 03:48 PM, said:
Apple Martini, on 04 April 2012 - 03:48 PM, said:
Apple Martini, on 04 April 2012 - 03:48 PM, said:
And, yes, sorry for the horrible thread drift. It all really leads back to the R+L=J mystery, doesn't it?!
#54
Posted 05 April 2012 - 10:53 AM
Pomp & Happenstance, on 05 April 2012 - 09:46 AM, said:
#55
Posted 05 April 2012 - 11:38 AM
As far as some of these crazy "what if" scenarios that people come up with.... If you read the conversation between the KG and Ned you understand that these arn't ordinary soldiers. These are true men, dedicated to their king, (even though he's already dead and they know they will probably die)... fulfilling his dying wish of protecting his lineage. They weren't there to strategize about how to escape or flee further, (lyanna's pregnancy would've eliminated that option).
#56
Posted 05 April 2012 - 11:40 AM
#57
Posted 05 April 2012 - 11:42 AM
#58
Posted 05 April 2012 - 11:51 AM
#59
Posted 05 April 2012 - 12:16 PM
#60
Posted 05 April 2012 - 12:20 PM







