Elba the Intoner, on 02 May 2012 - 10:17 PM, said:
Caro, I liked your thoughts regarding the parallels between Jon and Sansa here. I think this is another way that being a being a bastard could help Sansa besides giving her the freedom to act bravely, because it also allows her to come down to the level of someone who is not as high born as she is and relate to lowborn and common people in a new way. That is a very important quality for a good leader to have. So, it seems that Sansa is sharing parallels with both Arya and Jon, who are the two who at first were the most different from her of all her siblings and who she seemed to be the least close to. Add to this that we also got the sense from this reread of similar Sansa is to Ned, when at first she appeared to be Cat 2.0 (and still is to Petyr) it really adds such depth to her personality.
I think through rereading, it becomes more obvious that Sansa is a lot like Ned. I know people claim Arya is Ned writ small and in female form, but I tend to think of her more as a Lyanna come again, while Sansa has a lot of Ned's qualities: his compassion and thoughtfulness. That's not to say Cat didn't possess those qualities (I actually think Cat and Ned worked well together because they are rather similar and on the same "wavelength" in most things), because I think she was a compassionate person, and thoughtful and strong, but there is a sharpness to Cat that Ned seems to lack and that I'd say Arya has more of than Sansa.
It's also very interesting to follow Sansa's arc and how she learns to relate to "common people" or people of various births and station in life (Arya has a similar arc in many ways) and actually "see" them. In Kings Landing she associates with a retainer and a fool, in the Eyrie with bastard daughters, servants, maesters and lowborn knights and she's learning to appreciate that people can be good, bad or anything in between and that this is totally unrelated to birth or station. I agree that this is a very important quality in a good leader and something Ned knew well and I hope Sansa will emulate. In AGOT she's far more concerned with surface and glamour, but by AFFC, she evaluates people based on their personalities and characteristics. She describes Lothor Brune as strong, loyal and silent, Lyn Corbray as dangerous (and recognises the lie) and Mya Stone as stubborn as a mule. What she values is also different. Ned famously said in AGOT that he'd marry her to someone "brave, gentle and strong" and Sansa of AGOT could not care less, but Sansa of AFFC has learnt to really appreciate those traits in a person.
This also stands in stark contrast to how Cersei treats people as completely disposable, with utter contempt and a complete sense of entitlement. As scared of Cersei as Sansa is, I think she's learnt some valuable lessons from Cersei. The first is that Cersei is not a good people person. She can be lovely, but she has a hard time reining in her contempt and entitlement, which makes her unable to feel any compassion. This lack of people skills means she doesn't understand people and she prefers to have people around her she can rule with an iron fist instead of those she can subtly manipulate. Contrats with LF's wisdom: if you know what a man wants, you can move him. Cersei doesn't know and doesn't care that she doesn't know.
The second is that ruling/excerting power as a woman is hard, and it contains a lot of hard (and messy!) truths, even if you happen to be a queen. Nine part mess to one part magic, I think it was. Cersei also instructed Sansa on how to play the damsel in distress, or how to use sex to get to the goal, but the difference is that Cersei wants to rule through pure force, while she despises more subtle manipulations (even when she tries to use them, often unsucessfully, like with Falyse Stokeworth or the Kettleblacks).
voodooqueen126, on 03 May 2012 - 02:22 AM, said:
Exactly. How does Littlefinger plan on keeping in control of the Vale (a far more defensible territory), if not through Sansa-Harry the Heir?
Without the Sansa-Harry marriage LF would have no army with which to control the Riverlands (since non of it's lords have the kin ties and friendship that they have with the Tullys).
Yet his sexual interest in her is obvious, so he can either be interested in sex (and therefore loose the ability to use Alayne as one would use a real daughter), or use Alayne to make marital alliances with Harry (and thus give Sansa immense power).
Also poisoning SweetRobin when the child is already fragile, when a Sansa-Tyrion annulment would take years, seems incredibly stupid.
I should also say that LF is in full Humbert Humbert mode this chapter.
I just don't think that LF's ultimate goal is to have the Vale. The man has larger ambitions than that. That said, I think his original ambition with the Lannister/Stark infighting plot was to jockey for power, but I think now when he has Sansa, his plans are deviating a bit from their original. Now he doesn't just want power and revenge, he wants to have the dream of his youth come true, i.e. he wants ersatz Catelyn for himself. Which seems to work partly against his original powerplay, as he needs to be very patient to get to the end game, as it were.
Regarding Sansa's power in a marriage with Harry, Harry would be the one with the power in his hands since he would be the lord. Whether or not Sansa and Littlefinger could manipulate him...possibly. But Sansa would only be his lady wife with no real power at all.
As for the annulment, it's in the tapestry shipment!!!
Edited by Lyanna Stark, 03 May 2012 - 03:35 AM.