What are some opinion that You don't agree with?
#21
Posted 14 April 2012 - 01:53 AM
#22
Posted 14 April 2012 - 01:57 AM
DannySpud, on 14 April 2012 - 01:53 AM, said:
#23
Posted 14 April 2012 - 02:01 AM
Apple Martini, on 14 April 2012 - 01:47 AM, said:
Even Robert said it is one thing to conquer a kingdom, it is quite another to rule one, Genghis Khan's adviser, Yelu Chucai, once said it succinctly that empires can be conquered on horseback but they can't be ruled from them. It is the same if you replace horse with dragon. Dany is proving herself to be an amateur when it comes to governing, while with Jon it comes more easily to him since he has lost his sense of entitlement, and thinks things through before he acts.
One opinion that I don't agree with is that Sandor will be the Faith's champion against Cersei. There two problems with that:
1. How could Sandor have heard about Robert Strong and know who he really is in an isolated environment like the Quiet Isle?
2. The High Septon doesn't know about Sandor on the QI, and even if he did, why would he recruit a lame Sandor as champion when he has a supply of knights at his disposal?
#24
Posted 14 April 2012 - 02:01 AM
The Imp With A Pimp Limp, on 14 April 2012 - 01:57 AM, said:
ETA: Just saw the theory that it was genuinely Rhaegar and Robert doomed Westeros when he killed him. I quite like this one
Edited by DannySpud, 14 April 2012 - 02:06 AM.
#25
Posted 14 April 2012 - 02:14 AM
DannySpud, on 14 April 2012 - 02:01 AM, said:
ETA: Just saw the theory that it was genuinely Rhaegar and Robert doomed Westeros when he killed him. I quite like this one
Thats a pretty good idea, the timelines might not fit but I dont think it could be necessary for the timelines to fit.
Shes very similar to Aegon because she understands the common people.
Besides Arya is my favorite character so if this means she doesnt die Im okay with it
#26
Posted 14 April 2012 - 02:18 AM
Jon will sit/rule on the iron throne! I love Jon and I have hoped for the best for him. And being king of all 7 kingdoms is not the best!
Edited by Phénix., 14 April 2012 - 02:19 AM.
#27
Posted 14 April 2012 - 02:20 AM
Fire Eater, on 14 April 2012 - 02:01 AM, said:
It always bugs me that people point out how incompetent a ruler Robert was and then go on to praise Dany. To me they are mirror images of each other, just different genders. Both were clever at waging a war, both are utterly incompetent rulers.
#28
Posted 14 April 2012 - 02:38 AM
I also hate the idea that Dany is entitled to rule/ is a good ruler. Seriously, people can hate all of Westerosi customs and just buy into that one in particular? Dany's a terrible ruler. And I hate the idea that she'll get better by fiat now that she's had her test run (hundreds of dead people that is).
Cersei originally being smart and being retconned in Feast is another one. Make a list of all the smart things she did before Feast, now make a list of the things she did wrong when she was left alone for more than three seconds. Come back and talk to me once you're done.
Oh yeah, just the idea in general that some characters have to die as karmic retribution for betraying a favored character, even if they had their reasons.
And when people start comparing the deeds of characters ad try to assess their effectiveness but include the manner of their death and how many people mourned them afterwards. They're dead. They lost, they don't get bonus points for positive rep.
Edited by Castel, 14 April 2012 - 02:42 AM.
#29
Posted 14 April 2012 - 02:38 AM
1.) Tywin Lannister is a genius and master military general.
2.) Lady Stoneheart went crazy because she is dead(She's crazy after watching her last son die)
3.) Jaime Lannister has changed his ways
#30
Posted 14 April 2012 - 02:42 AM
#31
Posted 14 April 2012 - 02:42 AM
David C. Simmons, on 14 April 2012 - 02:38 AM, said:
1.) Tywin Lannister is a genius and master military general.
2.) Lady Stoneheart went crazy because she is dead(She's crazy after watching her last son die)
3.) Jaime Lannister has changed his ways
Agreed
Um yes and no at the same time
True but he's has learned a lot
#32
Posted 14 April 2012 - 02:44 AM
Castel, on 14 April 2012 - 02:38 AM, said:
I don't say that this needs to happen or anything but why can't it happen ? I mean there's a big retribution coming for the Freys, if I remember correctly someone said how if you break the Guest Rule then it's like a curse kind of thing and you are doomed. Also I could see a Stark back in Winterfell, and it still wouldnt be a happy ending, all the kids are scarred for life, they lost their parents, Robb, possibly Jon and Bran, not to mention every single person they grew up with. Those memories will haunt them forever, besides Rickon, Sansa and Arya could die but that doesn't mean they all have to die, one can still return to winterfell easily
#33
Posted 14 April 2012 - 02:48 AM
The Imp With A Pimp Limp, on 14 April 2012 - 02:44 AM, said:
I have no problem with someone believing this. But in an argument, when someone pulls something like this out it really annoys me. Basically it's the is-ought fallacy, things are not going to end up as they ought to be, and using it in an argument is pointless because no one ever provides any proof why things should end up that way.
#34
Posted 14 April 2012 - 02:48 AM
#35
Posted 14 April 2012 - 02:49 AM
Castel, on 14 April 2012 - 02:38 AM, said:
I also hate the idea that Dany is entitled to rule/ is a good ruler. Seriously, people can hate all of Westerosi customs and just buy into that one in particular? Dany's a terrible ruler. And I hate the idea that she'll get better by fiat now that she's had her test run (hundreds of dead people that is).
Cersei originally being smart and being retconned in Feast is another one. Make a list of all the smart things she did before Feast, now make a list of the things she did wrong when she was left alone for more than three seconds. Come back and talk to me once you're done.
Oh yeah, just the idea in general that some characters have to die as karmic retribution for betraying a favored character, even if they had their reasons.
And when people start comparing the deeds of characters ad try to assess their effectiveness but include the manner of their death and how many people mourned them afterwards. They're dead. They lost, they don't get bonus points for positive rep.
AGREED Cersei is one of the dumbest characters in the series.
My list of what makes her dumb
- Her server case of Penis envy
- Her paranoia
- Her delusional ideas about people.
- Her self entitlement
- Her Foolishness
#36
Posted 14 April 2012 - 02:51 AM
dannister, on 14 April 2012 - 02:48 AM, said:
Good? BAD? thats to black and white for this book. Some would say Ned is "GOOD" but we do not know his pass.
#37
Posted 14 April 2012 - 02:54 AM
#38
Posted 14 April 2012 - 02:57 AM
Castel, on 14 April 2012 - 02:48 AM, said:
I agree that when people say that it's gonna happen because it will is a stupid argument. I actually think you could back it up, I mean all three starks are missing, nobody is looking for them and Winterfell might be Stannis' in which case a Stark would prove helpful. Not to mention that if LF plans work out Sansa would become the ward of the North. For the Freys, like I said before someone said that its a curse to break the guest rule, there's also the rat cook story which I think is foreshadowing for what will happen to the Freys, Im not trying to convince you because it is a weak theory at best but there it is,
I agree that not all "bad" characters will die, which makes sense I expect Varys or Illyrio to survive and some will die too, Littlefinger. Just because GRRM decides to kill a bad guy doesn't mean he's a sell out or doing a disney movie
#40
Posted 14 April 2012 - 03:00 AM
dannister, on 14 April 2012 - 02:54 AM, said:







