[Book Spoilers] Nitpick without repercussion!
#21
Posted 30 April 2012 - 11:22 AM
I thought this was the speed up of his transition to a non-disreputable type, but looks like that might have been wrong considering in the last episode he told the commander of the city watch to kill a KG.
#22
Posted 30 April 2012 - 11:56 AM
#23
Posted 30 April 2012 - 12:01 PM
Tadco26, on 30 April 2012 - 10:36 AM, said:
I would imagine this will come up in her storyline on the show. Maybe next week. Otherwise, his marriage proposal would be awfully tempting.
#24
Posted 30 April 2012 - 12:17 PM
Dontos the Slim, on 30 April 2012 - 12:01 PM, said:
Seems like Jorah has already talked her out of it though, without the threat of losing a dragon. And someone already mentioned how he's all "pro-Westeros only" for fighting so I wonder how they're gunna bring the Unsullied into the picture.
#25
Posted 30 April 2012 - 12:41 PM
David Selig, on 30 April 2012 - 10:56 AM, said:
Bran giving orders to Rodrick about how to employ the troops is strange. He's only 11 in the series at this point, right? Rodrick or Luwyn should be the one in charge, not an 11 old boy.
This has been the biggest logistical problem with leaving out Riverrun, like you said Cat is gunna find him and how is Cleos supposed to return with the Queens terms? Also without Edmure throwing them back what's going to stop Tywin from marching on Robb?
2 of my bigger problems with the book was Cat not returning to her young boys (in the show she's expressed her desire twice now, which seems more realistic and makes her more sympathetic IMHO), and Roddrik running off with all the men and leaving Winterfell under-guarded, at least now it was 11 yr boy making that call...
#26
Posted 30 April 2012 - 12:41 PM
House Martell, on 30 April 2012 - 12:17 PM, said:
#28
Posted 30 April 2012 - 12:49 PM
I really love the scene between Arya and Tywin, but I'm afraid it might look really stupid when Arya doesn't choose Tywin to get killed after that threat.
#29
Posted 30 April 2012 - 12:51 PM
On the other hand, if Joffrey has reached the age of majority, then Cersei shouldn’t be Queen Regent anymore, merely Queen Dowager, a position which confers no actual power of rulership. In that case, Joffrey is now a ruling king and has no Regent.
And for all she wishes it were otherwise, Cersei is not, nor has ever been nor shall ever be, the Queen Regnant. That’s why Tyrion corrected Lancel calling Cersei “Queen” with her proper title of “Queen Regent”. She was only ever a Queen Consort, and the death of her King doesn’t change that. When the council named her Regent, it did change things, but only until Joffrey’s age of majority.
Notice how in Storm, Tywin pays no attention to Joffrey’s tantrums. Tywin even less lets the Mad Kinglet have his own puerile way than Tyrion does. Cersei is a weak mother and a worse Regent.
They’re acting in the show like Joffrey holds the real power of rulership in the show. That’s nonsensical in a regency system.
Edited by CrypticWeirwood, 30 April 2012 - 12:53 PM.
#31
Posted 30 April 2012 - 12:56 PM
What’s next, a murder of ravens instead of an unkindness of ravens? A group of crows is a murder; a group a ravens, an unkindness.
Folks who don’t know a raven from a crow, sheesh!
Edited by CrypticWeirwood, 30 April 2012 - 01:10 PM.
#32
Posted 30 April 2012 - 01:04 PM
CrypticWeirwood, on 30 April 2012 - 12:51 PM, said:
Jorah is supposed to go looking for a ship and we meet Belwas and Arstan on the docks so...do we know if a Belwas was cast? he's one character that could pretty easily disappear though...
#33
Posted 30 April 2012 - 01:07 PM
House Martell, on 30 April 2012 - 01:04 PM, said:
There’s been no announcement that he’s been cast.
He’s a pretty wide fellow to easily disappear.
#34
Posted 30 April 2012 - 01:13 PM
I hope my suspicions are unfounded as I would be gutted if they turn this into the same puerile guff that is always seen on screen.
The reason these books are sooo good is that everyone else is too scared to tell it the way it is (or was).
#35
Posted 30 April 2012 - 01:14 PM
CrypticWeirwood, on 30 April 2012 - 01:07 PM, said:
There’s been no announcement that he’s been cast.
He’s a pretty wide fellow to easily disappear.
#36
Posted 30 April 2012 - 01:23 PM
N.B.: Here's the Sea Bitch from the show. And here's a longship (remember how often the Ironmen's ships are referred to as longships - ALWAYS). I really don't know what they're thinking.
Edited by sbjackdaw, 30 April 2012 - 01:34 PM.
#37
Posted 30 April 2012 - 01:24 PM
Lannister_Lion, on 30 April 2012 - 01:13 PM, said:
people are upset with this but we also don't need Loras to go raving mad to know his love for Renly, the show has pretty completely demonstrated that already. Whats more important is that the Tyrells are going to oppose Stannis and make common cause with the Lannisters, which the LF, Loras, Margery scene shows well. I think having LF there is a great deviation from the book, worked really well.
#38
Posted 30 April 2012 - 01:32 PM
There are more, but these are a BIG concern for me.
I liked the Jorah and Dany scene, buts thats small consolation.
#39
Posted 30 April 2012 - 01:49 PM
House Martell, on 30 April 2012 - 01:24 PM, said:
I disagree, I don't realy feel that there has been much love from Loras side in the series, more manipulation, there was some when he was sulking by Renly's corpse, but that could just be the mourning of a good friend. If we were to have seen the Havok he wreaked, I feel that would have been a more genuine response for the loss of the love of your life. But that might just be me..
#40
Posted 30 April 2012 - 02:24 PM







