Ygritte
#41
Posted 09 May 2012 - 08:36 PM
#42
Posted 09 May 2012 - 10:50 PM
#44
Posted 14 May 2012 - 12:43 AM
Yoren's dying wishes that Jon switch sides to gain knowledge of the Free Folk was really just a mechanism to facilitate Jon's (deceptive) defection. I think this way will work out much better.
Also, I LOVE the casting of Ygritte! Any thoughts?
I'm posting this here because new topics in the HBO section are moderated which is a policy to which I would like to voice my opposition.
#45
Posted 14 May 2012 - 01:12 AM
#46
Posted 14 May 2012 - 02:55 AM
Jonas Schreiber, on 14 May 2012 - 12:43 AM, said:
Yoren's dying wishes that Jon switch sides to gain knowledge of the Free Folk was really just a mechanism to facilitate Jon's (deceptive) defection. I think this way will work out much better.
Also, I LOVE the casting of Ygritte! Any thoughts?
I'm posting this here because new topics in the HBO section are moderated which is a policy to which I would like to voice my opposition.
I am seriously digging Rose Leslie as Ygritte, which I said when I started this thread. As for the rest... no.
Based on episode summaries released weeks ago and posted by me here, the Quorin thing is still happening. The episode 10 preview states "Jon proves himself to Qhorin." I'm assuming next week Jon will be shown to be a prisoner of the wildlings, being drug around the way he was dragging Ygritte around, then in episode 10 (ep. 9 is all the Battle of the Blackwater) Quorin gets captured as well; by the end of the episode, he'll have ordered Jon to pretend to turn his cloak and to do whatever he must to prove himself a true turncloak, so the wildlings will buy it.
Jon can't really turn his cloak. If he does, then he's a contemptible oathbreaker, deserving of death.
#47
Posted 14 May 2012 - 05:36 AM
EDIT: Saw the episode, and usually I don't use smileys but:
Edited by Crown, 14 May 2012 - 10:41 AM.
#48
Posted 14 May 2012 - 12:25 PM
#49
Posted 14 May 2012 - 12:47 PM
#50
Posted 14 May 2012 - 05:26 PM
The Shadow Fox, on 14 May 2012 - 12:25 PM, said:
Yeah, I think they'll both be prisoners and Quorin will order him to do the fake heel turn and to do "whatever it takes" to prove it's real. Either they'll make them fight or it'll be similar to the book i.e. he'll offer to turn, and Halfhand will lash-out calling him a traitor, etc. and then Rattleshirt'll give them weapons so they can fight; or maybe he'll make Jon kill him unarmed, but I doubt the other free folk would like that very much. It's all gonna shake-out the same, though. His speech to Jon about them already being dead men who's duty is to lay their life down for the realms of men was foreshadowing.
#51
Posted 14 May 2012 - 05:29 PM
Independent George, on 14 May 2012 - 12:47 PM, said:
I could get behind that.
#52
Posted 14 May 2012 - 05:53 PM
J.S. Crews, on 14 May 2012 - 02:55 AM, said:
Jon can't really turn his cloak. If he does, then he's a contemptible oathbreaker, deserving of death.
Even without the episode summaries you raise an excellent point. I completely agree.
#53
Posted 14 May 2012 - 06:04 PM
#55
Posted 15 May 2012 - 10:35 AM
J.S. Crews, on 14 May 2012 - 02:55 AM, said:
Well he does break his vows*, but not turn his cloak.
This is a big issue in SoS, which ,at least, Stannis sees as so much clap trap and turns the tide for Jon.
(But the by, about two thirds of George's oath is very poetic, the part about being celibate non family man with a sword just seems like a load of horse pucky to to me. Just to pick one example the Spartans didn't do that and I would put them up against the NW any day.... and even the Spartans might not have stood a chance against the Mongols or the Comanche (who were polygamous).
#56
Posted 15 May 2012 - 02:10 PM
boojam, on 15 May 2012 - 10:35 AM, said:
This is a big issue in SoS, which ,at least, Stannis sees as so much clap trap and turns the tide for Jon.
(But the by, about two thirds of George's oath is very poetic, the part about being celibate non family man with a sword just seems like a load of horse pucky to to me. Just to pick one example the Spartans didn't do that and I would put them up against the NW any day.... and even the Spartans might not have stood a chance against the Mongols or the Comanche (who were polygamous).
the nw's duty is to fuck them others up their arses. they can't be thinking about their wifes, childs, dogs and stuff like that, they have to be 100% dedicated to what lies beyond the wall.
#57
Posted 15 May 2012 - 04:50 PM
boojam, on 15 May 2012 - 10:35 AM, said:
I've noticed the shift in tone as well, and wondered if all that mess about taking no wives was something added after the Night's King fiasco.
#58
Posted 15 May 2012 - 10:31 PM
#59
Posted 16 May 2012 - 03:21 AM
One could argue about the changes made in tv show compared to books but thats not the point in this thread, I think.







