Myrcella Baratheon, more!
#1
Posted 03 May 2012 - 12:28 AM
#2
Posted 03 May 2012 - 12:32 AM
#3
Posted 03 May 2012 - 12:45 AM
Edited by Grip, 03 May 2012 - 12:46 AM.
#4
Posted 03 May 2012 - 12:45 AM
#5
Posted 03 May 2012 - 12:53 AM
#6
Posted 03 May 2012 - 01:12 AM
#7
Posted 03 May 2012 - 01:23 AM
#8
Posted 03 May 2012 - 01:38 AM
#9
Posted 03 May 2012 - 01:42 AM
theguyfromtheVale, on 03 May 2012 - 01:38 AM, said:
wait, what? Perhaps my memory is failing me but I remember from one of Arianne Martell's Chapters that she recalled Myrcella being wounded, but to me it never seemed implied that Myrcella was killed.
#10
Posted 03 May 2012 - 01:55 AM
I know this is crackpot. I'm also not subscribing to this theory. But I find the possibility intriguing and have seen no actual proof that this can't have happened.
#11
Posted 03 May 2012 - 02:24 AM
I think in the end, Myrcella and Trystane will marry and they'll live at Casterly Rock. They seem quite fond of one another. He's not heir to Dorne, but she stands to be heir to the rock.
#12
Posted 03 May 2012 - 03:10 AM
Dr. Pepper, on 03 May 2012 - 02:24 AM, said:
Edited by Pellaeon, 03 May 2012 - 03:11 AM.
#13
Posted 03 May 2012 - 03:25 AM
Would you really want Stannis to take the throne and have Myrcella and Tommen killed as "abominations born from incest"? And once Cersei is taken out of the way, would Stannis (plus Melisandre) be a better ruler than Myrcella and Tommen, if the latter two got wise advisors like Willas Tyrell, Garlan, Margarey, Olenna, Lord Mathis Rowan, Randyll Tarly (the last one only on military matters)?.
The same goes for Dany: she has made a mess in Meereen, and what has she learned from that? "I´m a conqueror, not a nurturer, blood and fire...etc."...do we really want Dany to come and ravage the Seven Kingdoms yet again, or would we prefer some stability under Tommen or Myrcella?.
#14
Posted 03 May 2012 - 03:34 AM
Pellaeon, on 03 May 2012 - 03:10 AM, said:
Myrcella is Tommen's heir (although Westeros doesn't generally recognize females in the line until all possible males have been exhausted) but she's also heiress to Casterly Rock. And in my opinion, Maggy's prophecy doesn't point towards their deaths.
#15
Posted 03 May 2012 - 03:40 AM
The most likely "betrayal" is that she openly sides with Trystane ahead of Cersei in the upcoming conflict between Lannister and Martell. As Trystane is 3rd in line to the Dornish throne, it's no big stretch that she'll one day become Queen of Dorne.
The same scenario with Tommen and Tyrell isn't too unbelievable either - especially if Tommen learns that Cersei is behind the accusations against his wife.
Edited by cuendillar, 03 May 2012 - 03:54 AM.
#16
Posted 03 May 2012 - 03:50 AM
cuendillar, on 03 May 2012 - 03:40 AM, said:
I don't think Maggy's prophecy means her children will live and die as kings/queens. The books use multiple definitions of shrouds throughout. It's not always a burial cloth. Sometimes it's a cloak to cover a person, sometimes a word used to hide a lie. It could very well be that Maggy was saying that Cersei's children will have golden heads (from their hair) and their hair will actually be the shroud that contains the lie of their paternity.
#17
Posted 03 May 2012 - 03:52 AM
Dr. Pepper, on 03 May 2012 - 03:34 AM, said:
#18
Posted 03 May 2012 - 04:06 AM
Ser Lepus, on 03 May 2012 - 03:25 AM, said:
Would you really want Stannis to take the throne and have Myrcella and Tommen killed as "abominations born from incest"? And once Cersei is taken out of the way, would Stannis (plus Melisandre) be a better ruler than Myrcella and Tommen, if the latter two got wise advisors like Willas Tyrell, Garlan, Margarey, Olenna, Lord Mathis Rowan, Randyll Tarly (the last one only on military matters)?.
...
Edit: I would prefer Stannis as king and Davos as hand, rather than Mel..
Edited by Grip, 03 May 2012 - 04:07 AM.
#19
Posted 03 May 2012 - 04:17 AM
DR Supporter, on 03 May 2012 - 12:28 AM, said:
#20
Posted 03 May 2012 - 04:40 AM
I want Myrcella to marry Trystane, so they can live happily ever after.
But I don't think George is gonna go with that '' fairy tale " bit.
Stannis seems likely to become Kings, and if he does, he's gonna slaughter every Lannister in sight. Firstly, they're " abominations born of incest " and secondly, that's what the Lannisters did to the Targaryens.
I support Stannis. I would support everything he does. Even killing the Lannister children. It might be a bit harsh, but if he lets them live, who's going to guarantee they won't return in 20 years, fight for the Throne against an old Stannis or a sickly Shireen?







