The Latest News
Connect with Us
Notable Releases
1 FREE Audiobook RISK-FREE from Audible
From the Store
Game of Thrones Baratheon Men's T-Shirt
Men’s T-Shirt Baratheon
HBO US
Featured Sites
License Holders

Jump to content


2312 by Kim Stanley Robinson


  • Please log in to reply
18 replies to this topic

#1 Werthead

Werthead

    Immortal Robot from the Future

  • Forum Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 20,398 posts

Posted 05 May 2012 - 08:36 AM

2312 by Kim Stanley Robinson

Quote

Swan Er Hong, a notable performance artist native to Mercury, has her life abruptly changed by the death of her grandmother, Alex. As Swan is asked to investigate the project her grandmother was working on, her home city is subjected to a brutal terrorist attack. This sparks a series of journeys back and forth across the Solar system, from Mercury to terraformed Venus to drowned Earth and out as far as Io and Titan, as Swan and her allies attempt to discover the threat nature of the threat to humanity.

2312 is Kim Stanley Robinson's first widescreen, big-budget, blockbuster SF novel in some considerable time. His recent novels (such as the recent Galileo's Dream or his near-future Science in the Capital trilogy) have been modest in their ambitions, but 2312 trots out the same Robinson who charted the colonisation of Mars in such fascinating, exacting and sometimes-frustrating detail over the course of three books in the 1990s.

The novel works on several levels. On one, it paints a portrait of life in the early 24th Century where the bulk of humanity lives on Earth (and, increasingly, Mars) but the 'spacers' who have settled the rest of the Solar system hold increasing amounts of power, despite their small numbers. This portrait is vivid, rich and compelling. It shows Robinson's imagination at its most fertile, as he depicts Terminator, a city which rolls over Mercury's surface, permanently trying to stay on the nightside of the planet out of the fierce rays of the nearby Sun. Elsewhere he shows the terraforming of Venus as its thick atmosphere is stripped away and politicians debate on slamming giant asteroids into it to increase its rotation. Another section takes us to Greenland, where a huge damming project is underway stop one of the Earth's last few glaciers from melting into the sea. On Io people have to live in settlements which act as gigantic Faraday cages (to hold the immense radiation of Jupiter at bay), whilst in orbit around Saturn people go surfing on plumes of ice pulled out of the rings by the passage of the shepherding moonlets. As a grand tour of the Solar system, 2312 is constantly inventive and fascinating.

On the second level, the book is striving for literary credibility. Robinson has always been one of the finest writers of prose in hard SF (not, it has to be said, a densely-populated field), and that continues here. He may be fascinated by science, by technology and by visions of the future, but he's much more fascinated by people, as individuals and as collective societies, and how they operate. As such the characters are richly-defined and textured, showing surprising depths as the novel develops. The prose is also finely-weaved but Robinson's long-standing tendency to interrupt it with infodumps remains an issue, although much less so than in his Mars Trilogy. Most notably, Robinson's writing keeps two potentially dull sections (one featuring characters having to hike along a thousand mile-long tunnel, the other featuring a character adrift in space) from flatlining and in fact elevates them to two of the strongest sections in the book.

The third level, the actual plot, is where the novel hits the most bumps. In the Mars Trilogy Robinson portrayed a vision of the future where the characters had to deal with scientific hazards and the simple realities of day-to-day life in a hostile environment. Whilst there were antagonists, these were shown to be part of the naturally-arising problems of colonisation and the eventual need for independence. In 2312, however, Robinson has a much more overt and traditional thriller storyline in which mysteries need to be investigated and explored and a resolution reached. To put it mildly, this plot feels half-arsed at best and the novel improves dramatically when Robinson completely drops it for much of its middle third, instead focusing on his grand vision of humanity's possible future.

2312 (****½) is a credible and somewhat optimistic vision of our future, highly detailed and constantly inventive. Coupled with some rich characters and enjoyable prose, this makes for his finest novel in many years. However, some contrived plot twists and a dull thriller element weaken the narrative a little. The novel will be published in the UK and USA on 24 May.

NOTE: The first half or so of the novel strongly indicates that 2312 is set in the same continuity as the Mars Trilogy. However, a detailed timeline given later in the book reveals this is not the case and the two works are separate, although 2312 does borrow a few names and terms from the older work.


#2 TheDanish

TheDanish

    Sellsword

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 102 posts

Posted 05 May 2012 - 10:11 AM

Currently reading Red Mars.  So far I'm pretty happy with it, so when I finish the trilogy I'll probably pick this one up.

I'm a recent fan of Robinson - I really enjoyed The Years of Rice and Salt.  He's obviously very knowledgable in numerous fields.

#3 Myshkin

Myshkin

    Just You Shut Your Mouth

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,450 posts

Posted 05 May 2012 - 04:38 PM

No way 2312 is anywhere near as awesome as 2112.

#4 Werthead

Werthead

    Immortal Robot from the Future

  • Forum Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 20,398 posts

Posted 06 May 2012 - 11:11 AM

View PostMyshkin, on 05 May 2012 - 04:38 PM, said:

No way 2312 is anywhere near as awesome as 2112.

Album or song?

#5 Myshkin

Myshkin

    Just You Shut Your Mouth

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,450 posts

Posted 06 May 2012 - 04:32 PM

View PostWerthead, on 06 May 2012 - 11:11 AM, said:

Album or song?

What a silly question.  My statement is factual either way.

#6 Jon AS

Jon AS

    Baron of the 7th Roman Empire

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,918 posts

Posted 05 June 2012 - 04:36 PM

So, anybody else read it since? I think Wert was a bit generous, the thriller plot is absolutely insipid and boring. On top of that, I found it got a bit too preachy/didactic for a while in the "big terraforming project" parts, so I actually put it down when I got Caliban's War and burned through that in a day instead. Call me shallow, but a book that guaranteed a few explosions seemed very appealing at that moment.

The overall impression I got from it was that Robinson had two goals in writing this: talk about climate change (and the need to counteract it in some way) and just paint the picture of the solar system being colonised, with people travelling to and fro in asteroid terraria, living in post-capitalist societies and slowly turning into post-human beings. And then somebody pointed out to him that if he wanted to get it published as a novel, he'd need a plot. So he blindly reached into a bag with well known scifi tropes, grabbed "AIs causing trouble" and forced himself to reserve a few pages for that.

I don't really think I've wasted my time with this, but when you wish the author of a novel had neglected to include a plot, something has definitely gone wrong. I believe I would have enjoyed this a lot more if it was just focussed on the worldbuilding (but then I've read D&D setting sourcebooks for fun, with no plan of ever actually using them in a game...).

#7 Datepalm

Datepalm

    Scourge of Dnepropetrovsk

  • Board Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,816 posts

Posted 09 June 2012 - 05:05 AM

75% of the way through. STOP BEING SO FUCKING BLAH, SF authors!

I may be overdosing on this particular subgenre, since I read Blue Remembered Earth recently, and The Quiet War not long before that. They esentially tell the same story, but whats disturbing is that they essentially come to the same conclusion.

They're liberal-geek amusement parks. A guided tour of one half of the western culture war. The roller coaster of exciting new urbanism. The merry go round of climate change. Ferris wheel of non heteronormativity. That cute little train that goes around the park* of multiculturalism.

It's all very adorable and convenient, if you like that sort of thing, and I do like that sort of thing. I am so the target audience of these books it's not even funny. I read them, I enjoy them, i'll read more of them. I can read fanciful descriptions of space habitats, anarchist economic systems and new fangled family arrangements until the cows come home. And I like amusement parks too. But after a while, i'd like to see the rest of whats out there too. STOP CHANNELING RICHARD FLORIDA.

Basically, this now entirely failing to be in any way interesting or awe inspiring or thought provoking. It's just a kind of geek trivia porn. I read this stuff the way I read history articles on Cracked.com. I don't find it at all convincing, which, fair enough - SF is about the present, not about the future, ok. But it doesn't work for the present either. Its too neat and colorful in a tourist brochure sort of way. These futures don't feel in the slightest foreign or disorienting or futuristic. Lots of sex without gender. Lots of colonization without colonialism. Superficial multiracialism while actual religeon, culture and ideology become cheerfully contained esoteria, human variety for the sake of decoration. This isn't the future, its just the internet. Would someone please write something challenging?

*But only if it's got rails. If it's actually a tractor pulling wagons on car wheels, it can go fuck itself.

Edited by Taking Back DanzigPalm, 09 June 2012 - 05:07 AM.


#8 Sci-2

Sci-2

    11th Little Indian

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,934 posts

Posted 09 June 2012 - 08:57 AM

Quote

Superficial multiracialism while actual religeon, culture and ideology become cheerfully contained esoteria, human variety for the sake of decoration. This isn't the future, its just the internet. Would someone please write something challenging?

There's always Empire by OSC. ;-)

#9 Datepalm

Datepalm

    Scourge of Dnepropetrovsk

  • Board Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,816 posts

Posted 09 June 2012 - 09:23 AM

It did occur to me that John C. Wright published a space opera recently as well...

#10 Memory Lane

Memory Lane

    Zombie British Accountant

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,931 posts

Posted 09 June 2012 - 06:06 PM

Does it have any appallingly dull scenes where a character wanders around in nature? I'm trying to avoid reading anything like Frank Vanderwal from "Science in the Capital" ever again (seriously, the Most Annoying Internal Monologue ever).

#11 Datepalm

Datepalm

    Scourge of Dnepropetrovsk

  • Board Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,816 posts

Posted 09 June 2012 - 06:15 PM

Believe it or not, it actually DOES. LOTS. So do Blue Remembered Earth and the Quiet War, come to think of it. Y'see, they live in SPACE, and Earth is all messy becuase of CLIMATE CHANGE. And so now they all realize how precious NATURE is. I guess reflecting on nature is one of the touchstones of this kind of writing on this kind of scale.

Ok, it's not appallingly dull. The characterization might actually be the most interesting thing in the book, but it gets a bit irritating eventually - theres one very main character and only 2-3 others who get any development at all, which makes it on the claustrophobic side for a fairly long book. But before that sets in theres a nice sense of derangement to her pov that manages to give this future just a little bit of baroque granduer, a bit like some of Reynolds early Revelation books, but then it fades away into stolid, polite psuedo bohemianism very fast. Still, objectively speaking, it might be the best of the three (BRE and The Quiet War) but to be honest they're all blurring together in my head now.

#12 Ser Scot A Ellison

Ser Scot A Ellison

    My children's daddy

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 34,195 posts

Posted 21 June 2012 - 10:02 AM

DP,

I'm about 3/4ths through this book.  It does come across as a bit... smug.  Is that what you are complaining about?

#13 Memory Lane

Memory Lane

    Zombie British Accountant

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,931 posts

Posted 21 June 2012 - 10:18 AM

Blue Mars felt the same way, like KSR got indulgent and felt like he could fall back into hippie-ness.

#14 Datepalm

Datepalm

    Scourge of Dnepropetrovsk

  • Board Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,816 posts

Posted 21 June 2012 - 01:21 PM

View PostSer Scot A Ellison, on 21 June 2012 - 10:02 AM, said:

DP,

I'm about 3/4ths through this book.  It does come across as a bit... smug.  Is that what you are complaining about?

Smug is a good way of putting it. I just feel like theres nothing here but what is already accepted wisdom, kind of. I mean, it's not a wild conceptual breakthrough that gender norms will continue to become more flexible and that the environment is going to be damn important in the future. So on one level it tells me nothing about the future and nothing about the present, except the stuff I already know.

But on another level, I feel like this book is going to look really, really dated in a few decades. Like, it's so topically obsessed, and it can't seem to take even it's predictions out of those topical ruts. The most glaring subject is gender-sexuality-binarism. I don't know whether gender is really going to vanish as a concept in the future. Maybe it is, that's kind of reasonable. Maybe it totally won't - that's reasonable too.

But I do know that the way the book keeps circling the subject, fiddling with it, drawing attention to it, going to silly lengths - like the lame literary trick - which entirely out stays it's welcome - of not using a pronoun so we won't know the gender of one character (oooh, how transgressive. Give me a break) having another (I think) switch genders midway, having all the characters be untraditionally gendered, etc, etc - it's all excessive in a way that showcases how frantically concerned we are with this subject right now. It's a total and obvious cultural snapshot, and I expect better from my SF.

In fifty or a hundred years - even if everyone retrieving this from dusty disk-on-keys really will be a genetically engineered hermaphrodite - the treatment of gender in this book will look dated. It will look like fifties advertisements for nuclear fallout shelters look to us. Like a giant 80's hairdo.

And then, you know, I think it's actually kind of weaksauce even if I accept it's interests, so to speak. The reason we are having such trouble with gender is percisely becuase it's deeply rooted and important and fraught and so on. These books where it kind of vanished with a handwave and bit of technological tinkering and is just gone? Weak.

It's all intellectual surface posturing. Yeah, yeah, gender is a social construct perpetuated by the patriarchy, gender is a false binary and we're all very flexible and controlled by nothing but our very solid common sense, men and women (and everyone else) are merely consenting adults and sex is nothing but a healthy, easily fulfilled physical need. Sure. Yes. That makes perfect sense. And Fifty Shades of Grey just sold more copies than Harry Potter. Explain that, would you? Theres no Fifty Shades in 2312. Theres no self destructive collective cultural fuck-upedness. It's like KSR really think we can just solve all that with a bit good, well intentioned urban planning, nice public infrastructure and a good dental plan. (these kinds of books have sort of an obsession with residential geography.) Theres just no marrow to this future culture, no guts, and so it doesn't feel real. It's the furniture catalogue of futures.

So the ending is actually kind of the most interesting thing, for me. The almost only fragile suggestion in the whole book that things aren't that simple. That people aren't as totally and entirely rational as an economics 101 textbook. That they take comfort and meaning in weird shit, and will fucking continue to do so until the end of fucking time. But it's way too little, way too late.

(Sorry for the rant, i'm really interested in this whole confluence of futuristic sci-fi geography, social geography, urban planning as social activism, new urbanism vs. radicalism in planning and so on, and i'm trying to come up with a way of writing a seminar paper on it, so i'm kind of fumbling through some thoughts here.)

Edited by Taking Back DanzigPalm, 21 June 2012 - 01:27 PM.


#15 Ser Scot A Ellison

Ser Scot A Ellison

    My children's daddy

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 34,195 posts

Posted 21 June 2012 - 06:23 PM

DP,

I should be done with the book this weekend.  I'd love to read your paper.

#16 Datepalm

Datepalm

    Scourge of Dnepropetrovsk

  • Board Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,816 posts

Posted 21 June 2012 - 06:33 PM

Looking forward to your opinion!

(Paper is as yet entirely hypothetical. I'm not sure there even exists a course for which said paper could be written, but I live in hope!)

#17 Ser Scot A Ellison

Ser Scot A Ellison

    My children's daddy

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 34,195 posts

Posted 25 June 2012 - 06:19 AM

I finished on Saturday.  You're right it was weak.  It started out strongly but it meandered so much.  The Characters, even Swan, were odd.  It held my interest up until the tunnel incident after that I just found it a chore to finish.  I found the terraforming ideas interesting but the story itself just wrapped up far too neatly and easily.  Nothing is that clean.  The Smugness was partly the "Spacers good"... "Terrans bad" that ran through the book.  As though Humans in space wouldn't think of vast numbers of new and interesting ways to screw up our lives.  

I think you are right this will age poorly.

Edited by Ser Scot A Ellison, 25 June 2012 - 06:27 AM.


#18 Merentha

Merentha

    Neocount

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,352 posts

Posted 25 June 2012 - 12:34 PM

Shame.  It sounds like KSR really peaked with Red Mars (and to a lesser extent Green and Blue) and just hasn't gotten it back yet.

#19 Datepalm

Datepalm

    Scourge of Dnepropetrovsk

  • Board Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,816 posts

Posted 25 June 2012 - 01:04 PM

I think it was really well written actually, and I enjoyed the ride and got through it pretty fast, in terms of pacing and so on (there were a few dead spots.) It's thematically/conceptually deadly boring.