Fifty Shades of...could have been a better series *SPOILERS*
#1
Posted 06 May 2012 - 12:29 PM
Additionally, he's a fantastic piano player (though he rarely seems to practice), is in excellent shape (though we RARELY "see" him work out), and a CEO of a company that he's much too busy to run, because he's busy screwing the brains out of the female protagonist (Ana; which is just a fantastic play on words, because seh seems to be anorexic, what wither her forgetting to eat all the time).
This book could have been MUCH better had he seduced her to the "dark side". Sadly, the S&M is really fairly vanilla, for all the toys and props. Much better use could have been made of the "playroom". But noooooo....she uses a safe word when he won't let her come, for pete's sake. And what's worse is that the sex soon becomes very vanilla, as the characters get married after all of six weeks of fantastic sex.
Ok, I admit that when I was 21, I got married after 3 months of dating someone. But really, people aren't supposed to do that nowadays. Especially people living in larger cities, like Seattle. Getting married right out of college and so quickly is what people from Podunk, like I was, do.
Here's how I envision a much better "Fifty Shades" -
He seduces her to the dark side, making her beg to be his submissive. After a year of being his sub (and letting us see plenty of the more "Eyes Wide Shut" type of parties in Seattle/NY, etc), she rebels and wants more. He refuses. She leaves him, him giving her the dom equivalent of "frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn."
ANYTHING BUT ALL THAT VANILLA "ROMANCE". Honeymoon in the south of France, my arse. Bah.
#2
Posted 06 May 2012 - 12:32 PM
#3
Posted 06 May 2012 - 12:38 PM
#5
Posted 06 May 2012 - 01:41 PM
#6
Posted 06 May 2012 - 02:19 PM
#7
Posted 06 May 2012 - 02:37 PM
Chataya de Fleury, on 06 May 2012 - 12:53 PM, said:
Yeah, apparently she basically wrote it as a smutty Twilight fanfic, took it off the web, replaced the names and published it! It IS Twilight.
EDIT: Btw have you read the original? Is the writing as bad as Meyer's?
Edited by Lyanna Stark, 06 May 2012 - 02:51 PM.
#8
Posted 07 May 2012 - 06:45 PM
Sad thing is, the writer DOES appear to have some raw talent, but it's clear that she's uncomfortable with her initial subject matter. Seriously, the whole premise of the book was just...dragged down by this "now that we've found love, we must be/should be/WANT to be vanilla" angle that she's selling.
Oh - and, SCREAMINGLY bad, when Christian took pictures of what's-her-name while she was sleeping, she was "sucking her thumb." Jesus, what adult sucks his or her thumb at night??? Especially one with perfect teeth - because thumb sucking and perfect teeth do not go together.
#9
Posted 07 May 2012 - 06:46 PM
protip: you can also recognize a thumb sucker by a characteristic callus on the top of the finger,
Edited by Serious Callers Only, 07 May 2012 - 06:55 PM.
#10
Posted 07 May 2012 - 10:03 PM
#11
Posted 08 May 2012 - 06:57 AM
I'll almost have to read "50 shades..." now since I just forced my way through Twilight. It would be interesting to see which one is worse.The original was so bad it was nearly physically painful to read.
#12
Posted 11 May 2012 - 05:35 AM
But seriously, is it a fantasy? Paranormal romance? How does even a Twilight (and yes I loathe that series)-based story come to sound so.....mundane?
#13
Posted 11 May 2012 - 09:22 AM
Valkyrja, on 11 May 2012 - 05:35 AM, said:
Just vanilla "romance", in genre. Or "erotica". There are no elements of fantasy or paranormal. I suppose the goal was to bring "Twilight" to the masses who wouldn't read "silly stories about vampires". And it's about sales...once everyone who wants to read Twilight has read it, what's a publisher to do?
I noticed it prominently displayed in the Memphis airport bookstore.
#14
Posted 11 May 2012 - 09:52 AM
#15
Posted 12 May 2012 - 06:03 AM
#16
Posted 12 May 2012 - 06:08 AM
Chataya de Fleury, on 11 May 2012 - 09:22 AM, said:
I noticed it prominently displayed in the Memphis airport bookstore.
Ah, gotcha. I saw it yesterday when I was at the book store.....and it was displayed prominently near the paranormal romance section, so I was extremely confused.
#17
Posted 12 May 2012 - 08:31 AM
#18
Posted 23 May 2012 - 06:38 AM
#19
Posted 23 May 2012 - 06:50 AM
well, that's an objective aesthetic determination that renders your subjective rant manifestly erroneous, then?
#20
Posted 23 May 2012 - 06:55 AM
Actually, you should enjoy it - it's got a long legal contract the purpose of which's inclusion in the text in it's entirety is, as far as i can tell, sexual tittilation.






This topic is locked
