Greek Elections.
#401
Posted 28 May 2012 - 01:06 AM
WHY tie their *PRIVATE* debt in with *PUBLIC* debt?
#402
Posted 28 May 2012 - 08:04 AM
ThinkerX, on 28 May 2012 - 01:06 AM, said:
WHY tie their *PRIVATE* debt in with *PUBLIC* debt?
Because in addition they also hold a bunch of ohter stuff (pension plans, or just private citizen's stuff, loans to and from various corporations, etc.)
If the banks default that means all of those things (that are spread out all over the economy) goes poof. (or at least becomes functionally innaccessible until the bancruptcy is sorted out) this is likely to have knock-on effects. (IE: it takes out other economic actors who in turn might take out further ones)
Banks are incredibly tightly integrated into the economy (indeed, in some sense they're the roller-skating rink on which the economy rolls) picking one apart is really, really troublesome.
Now, what I'd do would be something like the swedish 90's crisis plan, which basically involved baling the banks out on condition that if they couldn't meet their payments they'd be nationalized and the useful parts sold off piecemal. But given that this is a multinatonal problem it's probably problematic from a purely administrative standpoint to do so.
#403
Posted 28 May 2012 - 02:24 PM
Quote
If the banks default that means all of those things (that are spread out all over the economy) goes poof. (or at least becomes functionally innaccessible until the bancruptcy is sorted out) this is likely to have knock-on effects. (IE: it takes out other economic actors who in turn might take out further ones)
Then go with a controlled shutdown instead of bankrupency.
To continue to support such stupidity is stupidity in and of itself.
#404
Posted 28 May 2012 - 07:44 PM
ThinkerX, on 28 May 2012 - 02:24 PM, said:
Then go with a controlled shutdown instead of bankrupency.
To continue to support such stupidity is stupidity in and of itself.
There's no really good way to do so.
There are ways to minimize these kinds of risks (various kinds of regulations on how and why banks are allowed to invest) but that's a long-term issue: The question is how you keep things running now.
Because shutting down the banks would essentially mean good sections of the economy (and we don't know which ones, and to which extent) will stop working entiely. And that's terrible.
#405
Posted 28 May 2012 - 09:25 PM
Quote
And if you don't start shutting down banks, then the consequences are even worse, because they *WILL* blow up anyways, and when that happens, they'll take entire countries with them. As I see it, no bailout, stimulus, or austerity package can prevent that from happening
#406
Posted 29 May 2012 - 10:33 AM
Interesting to note that of the EU countries surveyed all pick Germany as the hardest working with the exception of Greece, which picks itself as the hardest working. All countries surveyed pick Germany as the least corrupt.
Some interesting results.
Edited by snake, 29 May 2012 - 10:43 AM.
#407
Posted 29 May 2012 - 11:26 AM
snake, on 29 May 2012 - 10:33 AM, said:
No kidding. Thanks for posting that -- it's definitely worth a read. Germans having the highest percentage of people thinking they've benefitted from the EU -- fancy that.
To Greece's credit, they also had the highest percentage of people -- 42% -- blame the current economic problems on "ourselves". It seems there's very much a split in that country politically.
#408
Posted 29 May 2012 - 03:43 PM
#409
Posted 29 May 2012 - 04:32 PM
snake, on 29 May 2012 - 10:33 AM, said:
#410
Posted 29 May 2012 - 05:57 PM
These guys appear to have some supporters/possible candidates who possess a certain degree of popularity among middle-class voters here: Hubert Aiwanger, Hans-Olaf Henkel, Hans.Werner Sinn, Ekkart Cordes, Burkhart Hirsch, Thilo Bode etc.
Pollsters say that up to 20% of voters could possibly sympathize with this a new party.
http://www.handelsbl...ff/6684206.html
(avaiable only in German, sorry)
Edited by Järv, 29 May 2012 - 05:59 PM.






This topic is locked
