[TV spoilers] Dagmer speculation
#21
Posted 10 May 2012 - 12:02 PM
#22
Posted 10 May 2012 - 12:21 PM
sarah.jenice, on 10 May 2012 - 11:06 AM, said:
I am very curious about how they are going to do the part with the miller's sons. There shouldn't be any way for an Ironborn man to know about that mill with boys the same ages as Bran and Rickon and have the foresight to bring Bran and Rickon's clothes to pull of that deception. I guess Theon could come up with the idea, but that doesn't really go with TV Theon's more sympathetic character. Or perhaps they come across the mill, and Dagmer suggests it to Theon, and they quickly grab clothes from the castle.
The way I see the sack of Witnerfell turning out is (if Dagmer is not somehow Ramsay) that the Bastard of Bolton appears at the same time or shortly after the remainder of Ser Rodrick's troops and maybe other Northern allies and pretends to be there to help him but kills them all and burns the castle (just like in the book). I do think if it happens like that, we will lose some of the impact of Theon's story. Reek/Ramsay's betrayal was a big surprise to me, and I think TV viewers will be missing out, and it will be hard to explain why the Boltons turn against the Starks, but I think we still have time to work it out though. Maybe Ramsay tells Theon his father wants to be King in the North, and this will pave the way for him.
I can't wait to see how this unfolds!
I still stick with my original post that I don't think that Dagmer is really as loyal as he seems. I find it hard to believe that a veteran of 30 years Dagmer is foolish enough to believe that he can hold Winterfell without the north revolting. He may be loyal to Yara as someone stated? Possibly...
We know now that they are looking for a 20-30 yr old who looks creepy and looks extreme to play an important character in season 3. We can only guess its Ramsay Snow. It makes me wonder though, how will Theon and Winterfell fall? Will it be a raid from an unknown attacker? Or will he let somebody in to Winterfell? Arggh hate not knowing whats gonna happen!
Edited by Michaelj, 10 May 2012 - 12:28 PM.
#23
Posted 10 May 2012 - 01:14 PM
#24
Posted 10 May 2012 - 01:18 PM
Why do you really think they would need to twist the plot that much for a story that doesn't need it? Introducing Ramsay later is fine and can still give full impact of the betrayals to come. There's no need to morph Dagmer into anything more than he is. If anything, they've played up a character who was already pretty strikingly imposing in the books on his own merits. They're doing this to show the internal struggle Theon is having about betraying the Starks, and nothing more in my opinion.
In the book, we get a lot more detail about the ironborn and Theon's thoughts and conflicts. This is harder to show on television with just short scenes in episodes and so for many of the story lines they have added or embellished some of the characters to aid in the storytelling. If Theon had come up with this plan on his own, it may not have seemed as believable as having Dagmer, acting as the devil on his shoulder, encouraging it as well as 'paying the iron price' with Rodrik's death.
It's obvious to tv fans and book fans alike that Theon, for all his desire to be ironborn, just isn't measuring up. He wants Rodrik imprisoned, which is a much softer, kinder order from a Lord who has grown up among the more honorable Starks than the brutal Greyjoys. It's painfully obvious by now to most viewers that Theon's weaker character is NEVER going to be what the Ironborn expect of him and part of that realization comes through Dagmer's menacing presence egging him on to do these villainous acts.
It's completely reasonable to assume at this point Dagmer will be the mastermind bethind the Miller boys death / switch out and makes sense with as much screen time and antagonism they've given him thus far. It does not mean he's Ramsay in disguise, that's not only an unbelievable plot change, it would be confusing and nonsensical to both book and television fans.
#25
Posted 10 May 2012 - 02:16 PM
#26
Posted 10 May 2012 - 03:28 PM
#27
Posted 10 May 2012 - 03:33 PM
#28
Posted 10 May 2012 - 03:35 PM
Michaelj, on 10 May 2012 - 03:28 PM, said:
sarah.jenice, on 10 May 2012 - 11:06 AM, said:
DrogonSnow23, on 09 May 2012 - 07:53 PM, said:
The Smiling Eye, on 09 May 2012 - 07:21 PM, said:
Not to mention in countless other threads. It is losing steam as time goes on, fortunately.
Edited by Francis Buck, 10 May 2012 - 03:35 PM.
#30
Posted 10 May 2012 - 04:31 PM
Francis Buck, on 10 May 2012 - 03:35 PM, said:
Not to mention in countless other threads. It is losing steam as time goes on, fortunately.
I was just acknowledging what others have brought up. I love the many ideas that devoted fans come up with and at least give them the respect of my consideration without making them feel bad for saying it. I do not at all think it is true but felt I should include that quote out of respect for the other people who believe it is a possibility.
#31
Posted 10 May 2012 - 05:10 PM
But at the same time, if you're going to throw out a wild new theory, at least be prepared to back it up with some evidence and also some criticisms from those who don't think it's plausible.
I understand some people in this thread were saying perhaps Dagmer is acting the way we'd assume Ramsay did with Theon since no Ramsay has been introduced yet and likely won't be until next season. I think this embellishment of his character is perfectly acceptable and fitting for a strong leader among the ironborn men Theon's been thrown together with by his Father and gives credit to the truth of the story regardless which character portrays it.
#32
Posted 10 May 2012 - 08:04 PM
also, dagmer can not be ramsey... because everyone knows he's finchy
#33
Posted 10 May 2012 - 08:35 PM
#34
Posted 11 May 2012 - 05:30 AM
DrogonSnow23, on 09 May 2012 - 07:53 PM, said:
#35
Posted 13 May 2012 - 12:33 AM
What did Dagmer mean by Sir Roderick having to pay the iron price? Is that even how the term goes? I thought it was a reference to taking what you want. So how is Sir Roderick paying the iron price by losing his head?
#36
Posted 13 May 2012 - 12:40 AM
congokong, on 13 May 2012 - 12:33 AM, said:
Ummm it was Theon's Plan. Dagmer was just more supportive here.
A
Edited by Terilien, 13 May 2012 - 12:59 AM.
#37
Posted 13 May 2012 - 01:02 AM
Edited by Hear Us Roar, 13 May 2012 - 01:02 AM.
#38
Posted 13 May 2012 - 06:20 AM
DrogonSnow23, on 09 May 2012 - 07:53 PM, said:
The guy playing Dagmer is 42 that's way too old for Ramsay
#39
Posted 13 May 2012 - 10:47 AM







