The Latest News
Connect with Us
Notable Releases
1 FREE Audiobook RISK-FREE from Audible
From the Store
Game of Thrones Stark Ring
Stark Ring
HBO US
Featured Sites
License Holders

Jump to content


The Dragon Has Three heads.....(ADWD spoiler)


  • Please log in to reply
148 replies to this topic

#141 7V3N

7V3N

    A Father "Figure"

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,923 posts

Posted 21 September 2012 - 02:01 PM

Balerion was alive before the Targaryens moved to Dragonstone, and survived until some time after Aegon's Conquest.

#142 Ser Grimes

Ser Grimes

    Squire

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 246 posts

Posted 10 December 2012 - 11:41 PM

"The dragon has three heads" was only interpreted by Dany as meaning her dragons need 2 more riders, right?

The dragon has three heads could mean: The "Dragon" (ptwp, aa or whatever) has three heads (is a blackfyre).

#143 Bastard of Nightsong

Bastard of Nightsong

    Freerider

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 32 posts

Posted 11 December 2012 - 06:15 AM

View PostSer Grimes, on 10 December 2012 - 11:41 PM, said:

"The dragon has three heads" was only interpreted by Dany as meaning her dragons need 2 more riders, right?

The dragon has three heads could mean: The "Dragon" (ptwp, aa or whatever) has three heads (is a blackfyre).
The Targaryen dragon (meaning the family's sigil) is just as three-headed as the Blackfyre dragon. Only the colors are inverted. As to the meaning of the dragon having three heads, well, theories abound...

#144 Ser Endrew Tarth

Ser Endrew Tarth

    Castle Black's Master-at-arms

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,000 posts

Posted 11 December 2012 - 09:12 AM

Maester Aemon was convinced the prophecy meant there would be three riders, three people, three heads of the dragon (male and female interchangeable).  I like the idea (mentioned elsewhere in the forum) of a reverse gender Aegon the conqueror situation.  Dany as Aegon with two males at her side...  GRRM has hinted in a interview that dragon riders/heads of the dragon don't necessarily have to be Targaryen.  Aemon on the other hand seems to think Stannis doesnt' have enough Targ blood to qualify.

#145 Black Crow

Black Crow

    Heretic

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,281 posts

Posted 11 December 2012 - 12:27 PM

All that's actually said is that the dragon must have three heads. The three dragon riders is just a reader interpretation, as is the assumption that waking dragons/giants is literal rather a than metaphorical idiom for the awakening of "powers".

#146 The Dornishman's Wife

The Dornishman's Wife

    Forero

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,722 posts

Posted 11 December 2012 - 03:23 PM

Both Rhaegar and Aemon seem to believe that the three heads are three persons and that one of them would be the Prince(ss) that was promised. Obviously they can be dead wrong (and have both made mistakes about this before) and they are not independent sources (they have drafted their ideas off each other and likely interpret the same source material), but it's a bit harsh to say that "3 heads = 3 people" is just a reader interpretation.

For the record, what Maester Aemon says is:

Maester Aemon in AFFC said:

It was a prince that was promised, not a princess. [...] The language misled us all for a thousand years. Daenerys is the one
[.......]
The dragon must have three heads but I am too old and frail to be one of them. I should be with her, showing her the way, but my body has betrayed me.

What Rhaegar says is:

Rhaegar in a vision in ACOK about Aegon said:

"What better name for a king? [...] He is the prince that was promised and his is the Song of Ice and Fire. [...] There must be one more. The dragon has three heads."


#147 Ser Endrew Tarth

Ser Endrew Tarth

    Castle Black's Master-at-arms

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,000 posts

Posted 11 December 2012 - 03:24 PM

Aemon more than implies he thinks it means three people.  I like to think that he gets the closest to putting together the pieces to explain this prophecy in these moments of clarity preceeding his death.  700 woot!

#148 Black Crow

Black Crow

    Heretic

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,281 posts

Posted 12 December 2012 - 01:35 AM

View PostThe Dornishman, on 11 December 2012 - 03:23 PM, said:

Both Rhaegar and Aemon seem to believe that the three heads are three persons and that one of them would be the Prince(ss) that was promised. Obviously they can be dead wrong (and have both made mistakes about this before) and they are not independent sources (they have drafted their ideas off each other and likely interpret the same source material), but it's a bit harsh to say that "3 heads = 3 people" is just a reader interpretation.


Ah, no, you're misunderstanding me. I've no problem with "three heads" being three different people. What I said was that they're not necessarily three dragon riders

#149 The Dornishman's Wife

The Dornishman's Wife

    Forero

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,722 posts

Posted 12 December 2012 - 05:53 AM

View PostBlack Crow, on 12 December 2012 - 01:35 AM, said:

Ah, no, you're misunderstanding me. I've no problem with "three heads" being three different people. What I said was that they're not necessarily three dragon riders

Ah, I see, sorry for the confusion. And yes, while I personally think "3 heads = 3 riders" is a plausible guess, I agree that there's no real evidence for that and it could well turn out differently (in particular dragons could be temporarily ridden by people like Vicky or BB Plum before the dragon's head are even revealed).

Edited by The Dornishman's Wife, 12 December 2012 - 05:54 AM.