mushroomshirt, on 10 May 2013 - 11:04 PM, said:
I agree. In fact I think GRRM agrees. He basically tells us that the letter is at least partially fake in
this interview.
I was pretty sure the letter was written by Mance before reading this interview, but isn't it kind of telling that GRRM puts the two together so clearly in that quote:
Quote
GRRM: My readers should know better than to take anything as gospel, unless they see it for themselves, and even then I do sometimes use “unreliable narrator.” No. They should not take that as the truth. What about Mance Rayder, did you think he was really dead?
Seriously, the idea that it's Ramsay or Stannis has never made much sense to me.
It's not Stannis because he doesn't have the information needed to write the letter (he thinks Mance is dead, and even if he had spies in Winterfell, they'd identify Mance as "Abel" and wouldn't notice anything askew from him.
It's not Ramsay because, because of the information problem as well (he doesn't seem to know about most of the stuff in the letter). Most importantly though, it just seems like, from a story-telling perspective, it'd just be a random and idiotic plot contrivance to have Ramsay suddenly pick a fight with Jon. They've never met, and while Ramsay's a psychopath, he's generally acted fairly intelligently to preserve himself and further his station. Even under the most generous circumstances we could imagine, (suppose he really did capture Mance and defeat Stannis), it seems like it would be very out of his established character to randomly send a letter to the wall. Makes no sense.