i think he did.
0
do you think ramsay had a sexual relationship with reek#1?
Started by
lord mutton
, Aug 17 2012 10:13 PM
-
This topic is locked
29 replies to this topic
#4
Brony Stark
-
- Members
-
- 812 posts
If Stannis is the Night King 2.0... I'll still support him
Posted 17 August 2012 - 10:16 PM
Ramsey must have had a deficient nose
#5
Lion of Judah
-
- Members
-
- 4,901 posts
Lions Never Cower.
Posted 17 August 2012 - 10:21 PM
I don't know, you think he did with his dogs as well? Hmm...well that kind of disgusting.
#7
lord mutton
-
- Banned
-
- 98 posts
Sellsword
Posted 17 August 2012 - 10:24 PM
ramsay is how shall we put it...on the "fringe".
#8
Kittykatknits
-
- Members
-
- 4,791 posts
Member of the Oppressive Matriarchy
Posted 17 August 2012 - 10:33 PM
Black Lord, on 17 August 2012 - 10:21 PM, said:
I don't know, you think he did with his dogs as well? Hmm...well that kind of disgusting.
It's heavily implied that his dogs were a part of the wedding night. We also know he gave the first Reek the bodies of the women he killed while they were still warm so Reek could have his fun too.
#9
Longspear Ryk
-
- Members
-
- 441 posts
Landed Knight
Posted 17 August 2012 - 10:41 PM
Wouldnt suprise me he loves his reek
#10
grindylow
-
- Members
-
- 277 posts
Hedge Knight
Posted 17 August 2012 - 10:47 PM
Kittykatknits, on 17 August 2012 - 10:33 PM, said:
It's heavily implied that his dogs were a part of the wedding night. We also know he gave the first Reek the bodies of the women he killed while they were still warm so Reek could have his fun too.
I suspect that Reek#2's forced closeness with Ramsay's dogs is going to be what saves him in the end.
(edit: because every time that unaccountable plural gets quoted, i die a little inside)
Edited by Dolorous Jen, 17 August 2012 - 11:49 PM.
#11
lord mutton
-
- Banned
-
- 98 posts
Sellsword
Posted 17 August 2012 - 10:51 PM
technical ramsay was reek#2.
#12
I'm the Ghost in Harrenhal
-
- Members
-
- 33 posts
Freerider
Posted 17 August 2012 - 10:53 PM
i didn't get that impression. i guess all of the things ramsay made reek do fall under sexual abuse? but ramsay being explicitly sexual with reek never occurred to me.
i like this theory.
Dolorous Jen, on 17 August 2012 - 10:47 PM, said:
I suspect that Reek#2's forced closeness with Ramsay's dogs are going to be what saves him in the end.
#13
rmholt
-
- Members
-
- 2,773 posts
Council Member
Posted 17 August 2012 - 10:53 PM
Yes, a creepy one. Ramsay killed them and Reek "enjoyed" them, perhaps they also liked to watch each other
#14
Lady Katherine
-
- Members
-
- 178 posts
Squire
Posted 17 August 2012 - 11:20 PM
Ramsay is just a messed up, sick individual. If he had a sexual relationship with Reek or his hounds, I would not be surprised....
#15
HonourableSerLittlefinger
-
- Members
-
- 41 posts
Freerider
Posted 17 August 2012 - 11:31 PM
Silly little Ramsay. What did we tell you about that?
#16
Francis Buck
-
- Members
-
- 1,892 posts
easily disassembled
Posted 17 August 2012 - 11:43 PM
Dolorous Jen, on 17 August 2012 - 10:47 PM, said:
I suspect that Reek#2's forced closeness with Ramsay's dogs are going to be what saves him in the end.
That would actually be brilliant.
#17
Lady Flandrensis
-
- Members
-
- 370 posts
Hedge Knight
Posted 18 August 2012 - 12:10 AM
Though not spelled out, I think it's a 'read between the lines' thing. And I'd expect no less from Ramsay.
#18
Lord Tyrion
-
- Members
-
- 473 posts
Landed Knight
Posted 18 August 2012 - 12:40 AM
Maybe, jeyne & Ramsay & Reek
#19
Florina Stark
-
- Members
-
- 3,190 posts
Radioactive Sansa™
Posted 18 August 2012 - 12:43 AM
Kittykatknits, on 17 August 2012 - 10:33 PM, said:
It's heavily implied that his dogs were a part of the wedding night. We also know he gave the first Reek the bodies of the women he killed while they were still warm so Reek could have his fun too.
I dont remember reading that....
#20
Winter's Knight
-
- Members
-
- 7,172 posts
Captain of the good ship Briennsa
Posted 18 August 2012 - 12:43 AM
Yes. And I don't think he has stopped.
