The Wild Wolf Posted October 6, 2012 Share Posted October 6, 2012 In AGOT, Ned felt he might have to deal with Mance Rayder himself."The day may come when I will have no choice but to call the banners and ride north to deal with this King-beyond-the-Wall for good and all." -NedWhat if Ned had survived, and decided to battle the wildlings? What would the outcome have been, and who would you have supported?I've grown fond of Mance and the wildlings, so I would have been torn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chaircat Meow Posted October 6, 2012 Share Posted October 6, 2012 It's possible hostilities might have been prevented by discovery of the threat from the Others. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I am a bastard's bastard Posted October 6, 2012 Share Posted October 6, 2012 i like mance and the wildlings but i think if ned was alive it would be different i think i would support ned because of the way his pov would make mance seem, i think ned would respect mance and therefore we would to but ultimately ned woud have to stop him and therefore we would want mance stopped Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bourne Posted October 6, 2012 Share Posted October 6, 2012 In AGOT, Ned felt he might have to deal with Mance Rayder himself."The day may come when I will have no choice but to call the banners and ride north to deal with this King-beyond-the-Wall for good and all." -NedWhat if Ned had survived, and decided to battle the wildlings? What would the outcome have been, and who would you have supported?I've grown fond of Mance and the wildlings, so I would have been torn.I thought this was gonna be a thread about them fighting a duel. I'm glad it's not, since that question wouldn't be worthy of discussion.As to them fighting a war, that's really a ton of speculation. We'd have make up the variables completely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winter's Ghost Posted October 6, 2012 Share Posted October 6, 2012 In one on one combat? That would be unlikely to happen. Ned would take his own men and call some bannerman and they would go to the wall to deal with Mance and the Wildlings. I like the Wildlings a lot, but they'd be crushed by Ned and his army because they wouldn't be as organized, or have quality weapons. They might be able to hold them back if they did a guerrila type thing like they do in the Neck, since the Wildlings would know beyond the wall better.If it did come down to one on one, I don't know, probably Ned.As for who I'd root for? I really like the Wildlings, but I love the Starks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
butterbumps! Posted October 6, 2012 Share Posted October 6, 2012 I'd have supported Mance. I actually think he's an "untapped" source of knowledge/ importance with this whole winter "unpleasantness." I find him a lot more valuable than Ned in this regard, but I sadly think Ned would have put him down and beheaded him as a deserter (rules, rules) thereby losing a powerful asset. (and I think this sort of shows us an aspect that separates Jon from Ned-- Jon bends those rules a bit when there's a bigger cause, whereas I don't believe Ned would). Oh, and to bypass any questions about 1 on 1 dueling: keep in mind that Mance kicked the ass of every fighter/ clan leader of the free folk to become king. I think he's a better fighter than Ned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Green Ranger Posted October 6, 2012 Share Posted October 6, 2012 Ultimately, If Ned called his banners to take care of Mance, than thats exactly what will happen, he will take care of Mance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Wild Wolf Posted October 6, 2012 Author Share Posted October 6, 2012 Just to clarify, I meant a war between Ned and his bannermen against Mance and the wildlings. Sorry about that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
butterbumps! Posted October 6, 2012 Share Posted October 6, 2012 Just to clarify, I meant a war between Ned and his bannermen against Mance and the wildlings. Sorry about that.Actually, this is something that had me sort of confused, and I don't know if it's a plothole or will become significant. I don't think that there's any chance Mance + wildlings could have successfully gotten south of the Wall and not have been defeated by Ned and the North. Mance isn't a stupid guy, so I think he'd know this. It makes me wonder-- what was his actual plan? It could easily be that he thought defeat by the North was a better fate than certain death via Others, and it was just a hail mary pass. But it does strike me as odd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winter's Ghost Posted October 6, 2012 Share Posted October 6, 2012 Actually, this is something that had me sort of confused, and I don't know if it's a plothole or will become significant. I don't think that there's any chance Mance + wildlings could have successfully gotten south of the Wall and not have been defeated by Ned and the North. Mance isn't a stupid guy, so I think he'd know this. It makes me wonder-- what was his actual plan? It could easily be that he thought defeat by the North was a better fate than certain death via Others, and it was just a hail mary pass. But it does strike me as odd.I don't think it would matter to him, all he probably thought about was to get past the wall, there wasn't really any other option. Maybe they would get past and just scatter and try to get away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Arryn Posted October 6, 2012 Share Posted October 6, 2012 I see it going kinda like Harold Godwinson vs.Gruffydd ap Llywelyn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ser Snowflake Posted October 6, 2012 Share Posted October 6, 2012 Mance's army was huge but a large percentage of his host were women, children, and all of their possessions. Mance was not on a crusade, he was on a suicide mission and considering the enemy he was facing......maybe he felt that he had better chance of defeating the armies of the living. With that said, any Stark bannermen could probably have broken Mance's host. If Mance's was truly smart, he would have tried to appeal to the Night's Watch or The Starks of Winterfell describing their plight. I think a battle between the white walkers versus a unified north and Night's Watch would be an orgy of wights, white walkers, crows, wolves, fire arrows, skinners, wargs, Tormund's member, the Stark's direwolves, Hodor, and a thousand eyes and one. One can still hope... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Daemon Blackfyre Posted October 6, 2012 Share Posted October 6, 2012 We all saw what Stannis did to the wildling horde with a few hundred knights. Mance vs the Ned? Lord Eddard Stark and the Northern heavy cavalry, all day every day.Now, after Mance's horde has been smashed and broken, will the Northmen listen to any wildling prisoner's tales about the Others? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fallen Posted October 6, 2012 Share Posted October 6, 2012 ...all day every day. I don't know what else to say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pod The Impaler Posted October 6, 2012 Share Posted October 6, 2012 If we're talking about a scenario where Ned did not go south as Hand, no calling of the northern banners for the war of 5 kings, then the wildlings would be screwed. They couldn't handle a few thousand of Stannis' army, so against even more northerners plus the Night's Watch, they'd have likely fared worse.Actually this brings up another scenario - Mance Rayder snuck into Winterfell, posing as a singer. He was there when Ned and King Robert were. Imagine if instead of sneaking back across the Wall, he'd have announced himself, claimed guest right with bread & salt, and then proceeded to explain what was going on beyond the wall to Robert, king-to king (and to Ned).If he had gathered his army, but then told them they were fleeing the Others, would Ned & Robert have rejected him utterly ? Or would they have made some sort of pact in the manner that Jon Snow / Stannis eventually did ? (Ned did want to settle the Gift.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Arryn Posted October 6, 2012 Share Posted October 6, 2012 Dunno how guest rights work with impersonation/disguise.I'd imagine you might be in a dubious place if you get in by deception and then staked your life on a point of protocol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winterfellian Posted October 6, 2012 Share Posted October 6, 2012 Mance's army was huge but a large percentage of his host were women, children, and all of their possessions. Mance was not on a crusade, he was on a suicide mission and considering the enemy he was facing......maybe he felt that he had better chance of defeating the armies of the living.With that said, any Stark bannermen could probably have broken Mance's host. If Mance's was truly smart, he would have tried to appeal to the Night's Watch or The Starks of Winterfell describing their plight. :agree: Completely with this. Mance is one of my favorites but Ned and the bannermen would have crushed him and his people in a second. About Mance making an appeal, giving that he wanted to preserve not only the lives of his people but also their way of living I don't see it happening. He was being too uncompromisingin this regards so an appeal probably would never had worked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Lord's Kiss Posted October 6, 2012 Share Posted October 6, 2012 One on one though? I think The Mance would have owned The Ned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corvinus85 Posted October 6, 2012 Share Posted October 6, 2012 My question is: where would this war have been fought? Would Ned really have taken 20,000 Northmen north of the Wall, and started searching for Mance, or would he have waited for word from the Night's Watch when Mance was ready to threaten the Wall? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tyrions sliced nose Posted October 6, 2012 Share Posted October 6, 2012 I'd have supported Mance. I actually think he's an "untapped" source of knowledge/ importance with this whole winter "unpleasantness." I find him a lot more valuable than Ned in this regard, but I sadly think Ned would have put him down and beheaded him as a deserter (rules, rules) thereby losing a powerful asset. (and I think this sort of shows us an aspect that separates Jon from Ned-- Jon bends those rules a bit when there's a bigger cause, whereas I don't believe Ned would). Oh, and to bypass any questions about 1 on 1 dueling: keep in mind that Mance kicked the ass of every fighter/ clan leader of the free folk to become king. I think he's a better fighter than Ned.Really? who still lived at the TOJ even if it was 7 vs 3, it was Ned.When the smallfolk talk on who killed the sword of the morning, the great athur dayne they probably say Ned did. Hes pretty underrated when in truth he shouldve been a superstar warrior after destroying the targaryan reign with help from robert. Robert killed Rhaegar but Ned Killed Dayne who was a million times a better warrior than Rheagar ever was. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.