Why bring her back?
#1
Posted 29 November 2012 - 12:30 AM
#2
Posted 30 January 2013 - 04:59 PM
#3
Posted 30 January 2013 - 05:22 PM
#4
Posted 30 January 2013 - 07:37 PM
#5
Posted 31 January 2013 - 02:07 PM
Lion Of Judah, on 30 January 2013 - 07:37 PM, said:
I don't think Cat cares about Jon. She hated Jon. As far as she's concerned, he's a bastard born of Ned's infidelity.I don't think Cat views Jon as a member of House Stark
#6
Posted 23 February 2013 - 10:38 AM
vjott, on 30 January 2013 - 04:59 PM, said:
But I think, Martin just wanted to make sure again, that it is possible to bring characters back from death and that will be more importent later on and Cat was just an example. And of course Brienne's story needed some change in it, otherwise she'd be running around Westeros for her whole life, searching for Sansa.
#7
Posted 23 February 2013 - 10:40 AM
Lion of Judah, on 30 January 2013 - 07:37 PM, said:
#8
Posted 23 February 2013 - 05:34 PM
The Mountain That Flies, on 30 January 2013 - 05:22 PM, said:
The flip flop in personality has to be foreshadowing. Lady Catelyn is full of vengeful rage, but I disagree that it is just now appearing. She was just as harsh prior to her death due to reaction to taking Tyrion hostage. But think, she was vengeful due to the attack on her life and, most importantly, her son Brans. The future for this new Catelyn seems to be out to right the wrongs that were committed against her, and I agree with The Mountain That Flies, BWB is a power in the riverlands (Robin Hood mentality). Their strength doesn’t lie in numbers but in support from the common folk. The ones that suffer throughout the entirety of the book; those that very few care about. The BWB is their sword and shield.
#9
Posted 23 February 2013 - 06:19 PM
Lady Wolf, on 23 February 2013 - 10:40 AM, said:
#10
Posted 24 February 2013 - 10:48 AM
Lion of Judah, on 23 February 2013 - 06:19 PM, said:
Speaking of the will, am i right in saying we haven't heard anything more of it?
I briefly remember Robb talking about putting Jon in the will, but we didn't see what was actually written down did we?
#11
Posted 24 February 2013 - 11:14 AM
woftis, on 24 February 2013 - 10:48 AM, said:
I briefly remember Robb talking about putting Jon in the will, but we didn't see what was actually written down did we?
#12
Posted 24 February 2013 - 11:15 AM
Lion of Judah, on 23 February 2013 - 06:19 PM, said:
#13
Posted 24 February 2013 - 11:27 AM
Lady Wolf, on 24 February 2013 - 11:15 AM, said:
#14
Posted 25 February 2013 - 04:06 AM
Lion of Judah, on 24 February 2013 - 11:27 AM, said:
I'm interested to see how this plays out. Surely there was some significance to naming Jon the heir but I can't see him leaving the Night's Watch, especially in his current position.
I would be destoryed if someone other than a Stark gets it.
#15
Posted 25 February 2013 - 10:57 AM
#16
Posted 25 February 2013 - 03:37 PM
RolanDeschain14, on 25 February 2013 - 10:57 AM, said:
I wanted her dead too but this way it's more interesting. Why bring her back? Because it's livelier (pun intended) that way! Who wouldn't want their dead mother hunting Frey scum across the continent of Westeros?
#17
Posted 12 March 2013 - 08:24 PM
Little Fingers, on 29 November 2012 - 12:30 AM, said:
No idea...but thinking about it makes me wonder if she'll be a "bad-ass" now, no more thoughts of honor, loyalty, etc, just cut throat revenge watching for her children! I have to say, if I was in her shoes and could come back and protect my kids, I'd make sure they're all ok and make the Freys and Lannisters pay dearly!
#18
Posted 22 May 2013 - 10:46 PM
Little Fingers, on 29 November 2012 - 12:30 AM, said:
Seriously though, many theorize that she will
Edited by Queen Visenya, 22 May 2013 - 10:59 PM.






