Barristan Selmy, True Knight or Jackbooted Thug?
#1
Posted 12 December 2012 - 08:03 AM
He served in Aery's Kingsguard blindly. Facilitating an absolute monster.
While this charge should be leveled at all the Kingsguard some have mitigating reasons, Dayne, Hightower and Whent were obviously in on some plot with Rhaegar to overthrow Aerys. Lleywn Martell's family was held hostage in all but name. Jaime killed Aerys and saved hundreds of thousands of lives at the right moment. Darry...we know nothing about
Which gets me to the next point. Jaime "served [Aerys] well. When serving was safe", but at least Jaime actually switched sides. Barristan fell in battle (I'll give that he was serving when it was dangerous) to wake up on Robert's side. All he needed to do was swear an oath.
Then as Lord-Commanders of the Kingsguard he spent the next 15 years doing a most perfunctory job. None of the Kingsguard are loyal to him or Robert and one is an overweight disgrace. He doesn't join Jon Arryn or Stannis Baratheon's confidience as they tried to protect Robert.
He barely helps Ned Stark when he comes. He objects to the murder of an unborn child. But unlike Eddard he doesn't have the moxie to back it up. Then he does nothing when the deceased King's will is completely dishonoured. Or when Ned Stark is executed.
He then serves Joffrey even though he's a nasty piece of work. FINALLY he doesn't even quit, he has to be fired before he leaves the Kingsguard.
It's my opinion that Barristan Selmy is the sort of person who'd wind up in the Hague claiming he was "just following orders".
What are your thoughts on the man?
#2
Posted 12 December 2012 - 08:37 AM
#3
Posted 12 December 2012 - 08:41 AM
#4
Posted 12 December 2012 - 08:44 AM
The man has a code, he has integrity. Remember he didn't just serve the mad king. He served a dynasty. He served in an office. He has shown an ability to council Dany and several times to lead troupes. He also is genuinely good at being a body guard. He is no Janos Slint.
Edited by Where whores go <-, 12 December 2012 - 09:02 AM.
#5
Posted 12 December 2012 - 08:49 AM
#6
Posted 12 December 2012 - 08:52 AM
#7
Posted 12 December 2012 - 08:57 AM
#8
Posted 12 December 2012 - 09:10 AM
mormont, on 12 December 2012 - 08:57 AM, said:
Where whores go <-, on 12 December 2012 - 08:44 AM, said:
Edited by GallowsKnight, 12 December 2012 - 09:13 AM.
#9
Posted 12 December 2012 - 09:12 AM
GallowsKnight, on 12 December 2012 - 09:10 AM, said:
The road to hell is paved with good intentions. And traitors. Those too...
#10
Posted 12 December 2012 - 09:15 AM
ab aeterno, on 12 December 2012 - 09:12 AM, said:
KingWolf, on 12 December 2012 - 08:41 AM, said:
Edited by GallowsKnight, 12 December 2012 - 09:17 AM.
#12
Posted 12 December 2012 - 09:19 AM
ab aeterno, on 12 December 2012 - 09:17 AM, said:
Though technically she isn't a traitor (but Westerosi who aid her are). House Targaryan has no feuadal bonds to Stannis regime. But she would be a foreign invader.
Yeah her results are pretty crappy sometimes.
#13
Posted 12 December 2012 - 09:23 AM
#14
Posted 12 December 2012 - 09:24 AM
GallowsKnight, on 12 December 2012 - 08:03 AM, said:
Is that obvious? Not obvious enough for me clearly. I didn't get that impression at all. I assumed they'd been given orders and were following them.
#15
Posted 12 December 2012 - 09:25 AM
GallowsKnight, on 12 December 2012 - 09:19 AM, said:
Though technically she isn't a traitor (but Westerosi who aid her are). House Targaryan has no feuadal bonds to Stannis regime. But she would be a foreign invader.
Yeah her results are pretty crappy sometimes.
The traitor is potentially you, Ser. The King does not forget.
#19
Posted 12 December 2012 - 09:34 AM
If he were a Jackbooted thug I think we would have seen him defile his honor in more visceral ways - like say; participating in the Sansa beat downs or being contented with a land grant and retirement (self serving needs) and not caring about the dishonor his dismissal entailed.







