US Politics: Trillion Dollar Coins and other Shiny Objects
#1
Posted 09 January 2013 - 07:50 PM
Horza - Ron Paul might be the best one of all...still probably would need the Fed on the other side.
#2
Posted 09 January 2013 - 07:52 PM
#3
Posted 09 January 2013 - 07:56 PM
That said...where would said coin physically reside?
Also, what is the effect when said coin in inevitably 'misplaced' or 'stolen'?
(A great many million dollar coins might work a lot better here.)
#4
Posted 09 January 2013 - 07:59 PM
ThinkerX, on 09 January 2013 - 07:56 PM, said:
Fidel Castro will be rubbing his hands with glee.
Quote
Fort Knox?
Quote
(A great many million dollar coins might work a lot better here.)
If it gets stolen, mint another one. It's not like the thieves will ever get to spend the thing, and melting it down will only give a few thousand dollars.
#5
Posted 09 January 2013 - 08:04 PM
It just fits the spirit of the coin so well.
#6
Posted 09 January 2013 - 08:06 PM
ThinkerX, on 09 January 2013 - 07:56 PM, said:
That said...where would said coin physically reside?
Also, what is the effect when said coin in inevitably 'misplaced' or 'stolen'?
(A great many million dollar coins might work a lot better here.)
Did you see the Economist article I posted in the last thread? They suggested rather than the government produce such a coin to back up debt, they produce coins with a face value of $50 Million and sell them to the public. ie Corporations and mutual funds that need money stashed safely. The coins would be safeguarded at the Federal Reserve.
#9
Posted 10 January 2013 - 12:39 PM
#11
Posted 10 January 2013 - 01:39 PM
Mlle. Zabzie, on 10 January 2013 - 12:39 PM, said:
Seems like a cool guy. Apparently the GOP doesn't like him to some extent because he's been "disrespectful" of their lack of math skills during various negotiations.
Also, his name is ripe for punning, so I'm cool with him.
Edited by Shryke, 10 January 2013 - 01:40 PM.
#12
Posted 10 January 2013 - 01:47 PM
Edited by DanteGabriel, 10 January 2013 - 01:48 PM.
#13
Posted 10 January 2013 - 01:56 PM
Mlle. Zabzie, on 10 January 2013 - 12:39 PM, said:
He'll be the highest ranking orthodox Jew in US government history (category: executive branch). So that's nice.
Also, I am absolutely certain that the NY Post will call refer to the next fiscal agreement as a "Lew-d deal", so that'll be fun.
#14
Posted 10 January 2013 - 02:01 PM
Just watched Obama's press conference announcing his nomination. There was thunderous applause for Geithner which CNBC called "obviously genuine", and Obama said he had never paid attention to Lew's signature before yesterday and almost rescinded his decision, but Lew has agreed to make at least one letter of his signature recognizable so as not to debase US currency.
#15
Posted 10 January 2013 - 02:49 PM
Personally, I'm a bit miffed that we're getting two Republicans in a row for this position, something a GOP president would never do for us. Maybe this is part of some scheme to cut military spending, and if so we'd better damn well get results.
Edited by TrackerNeil, 10 January 2013 - 02:50 PM.
#16
Posted 10 January 2013 - 02:59 PM
Fragile Bird, on 10 January 2013 - 12:57 PM, said:
Think of that signature on US currency.
This is a guy after my own heart. Once I figured out that it doesn't matter what you signature looks like on credit card receipts, all bets were off. I'm to the point where I just scribble back and forth really fast with the pen.
#17
Posted 10 January 2013 - 04:00 PM
TrackerNeil, on 10 January 2013 - 02:49 PM, said:
Nitpick: the current Secretary of Defence is a Democrat. But, yes, there is a strange tradition of Democrats appointing Republicans to the position, but never vice versa:
http://en.wikipedia....tary_of_Defense
#18
Posted 10 January 2013 - 04:26 PM
#19
Posted 10 January 2013 - 04:46 PM
TrackerNeil, on 10 January 2013 - 02:49 PM, said:
Yesterday, during my weekly 15 minutes of torturning myself, I heard Limbaugh foaming at the mouth about Hagel. Apparently, Hagel is the first stroke in Obama's nefarious plan to dismantle the military. Not cut spending, but dismantle it entirely over the next generation. And Obama will have the time to do this because he's going to get himself elected president for life.
The sad thing is, I could hear in his voice that he didn't believe a single word he was saying. It was almost like he was reading from a script. But the idiots that worship him will continue to eat it up and treat it as gospel.
We can never hope for sanity from the right as long as he lives.
#20
Posted 10 January 2013 - 05:48 PM






This topic is locked
