Are you going to watch zero-dark-thirty ?
Started by
direwolf_of_white_fangs
, Jan 09 2013 08:51 PM
59 replies to this topic
#10
Posted 10 January 2013 - 12:07 PM
Sturn, on 10 January 2013 - 07:47 AM, said:
I've already seen an interivew from a CIA rep stating some things were completely distorted for the big screen. Of course this is expected. I fear that the distortion though will become the truth to the world.
Really? I'm curious now as to know what are the distortions you are talking about. If you can give a few examples please.
But yeah, this is largely a film, albeit based on real facts or documentary type, still a piece of fiction.
But the bulk of it should be sound or as it happened.
#11
Posted 10 January 2013 - 12:09 PM
andrew02, on 10 January 2013 - 07:05 AM, said:
Saw this the other day, was pretty average imo, i did enjoy the last act however. Especially compared to the Hurt Locker (which i studied for my final media high school exams).
Hurt locker was allright but my favorite film by Bigelow is still Point Break, great film!
#13
Posted 10 January 2013 - 04:37 PM
direwolf_of_white_fangs, on 10 January 2013 - 12:07 PM, said:
Really? I'm curious now as to know what are the distortions you are talking about. If you can give a few examples please.
Going from memory, the interrogations. There was mention of the dog collar scene at Abu Ghhraib being borrowed and protrayed in the movie as if it had something to do with the interrogations to find Bin Laden, which it didn't.
#16
#20
Posted 10 January 2013 - 06:19 PM
BLU-RAY, on 10 January 2013 - 06:17 PM, said:
I am way more interested to see this now than I was before it came out; I was concerned (and still am, but less so) that it would either come off as an endorsement of torture or would be interpreted as such by the public.
It's there and that's that. It happened. It's not an endorsement not an indictment. Up to you to interpret it.







