unJon

Members
  • Content count

    3,808
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About unJon

  • Rank
    Cynically Skeptical

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://
  • ICQ
    0

Recent Profile Visitors

4,179 profile views
  1. Or your ingroup genre reading comprehension is reacting to the new way of learning Bakker is throwing down. No weepers on the slog.
  2. I think unclear. Per AMA there was no understanding by Kellhus that Ajokli could use him like a rag doll avatar.
  3. That seems to be a good fit. Also, May 2019 is so far away. Ugh.
  4. Love it! When the No God finished, Crabicus said, "Well you're pretty good old son But sit down in that chair right there And let me show you how it's done!" Fire in Ishual, run, boys, run The No God's in the house of the setting sun Chicken in the bread pan a picking out dough, Granny does your sranc bite, "No, child, no"
  5. We still talking about the weredeer book?
  6. I've mellowed with this book over time. I found some of the writing to be a bit too on the nose, but I think the ending works for what it is and is actually relatively well foreshadowed.
  7. Funny as the switch in style should only be in the third omnibus. If the second omnibus got two stars it was probably due to it being just more of the same as in the first omnibus without moving along the overall plot. Which would be a fair complaint. I liked the final set of volumes and do think Parker had trouble trying to figure out how to bring everything together, necessitating the long break in volumes and the change in style.
  8. Anyone? Bueller? Bueller?
  9. Of our time? I'd much rather read John Irving.
  10. Oh. Hah. Only read the Bakker story.
  11. It intoroduces some potentially new magic or divine power. I guess that's something.