Jon's Queen Consort

Members
  • Content count

    21,112
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Jon's Queen Consort

  • Rank
    Lonely and lovely and lethal.

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Female
  • Location
    Dornish Oldtown.
  • Interests
    Arty stuff:
    Cinema
    Books
    TV series:
    (Doctor Who, Sherlock, Hunted, Strike Back)
    Photography
    Comics
    DOCTOR WHO!!!
    Star Wars
    Star Trek


    I am a NERD and a GEEK :D

Previous Fields

  • Name
    The Doctor's Consort or JQC Jedi Weapon Master

Recent Profile Visitors

28,340 profile views
  1. My wishful thinking head canon is that all of Maege's daughters are Tormund’s. YOU CANNOT SAY THAT THEY ARE NOT!
  2. Timewise it couldn't. Timewise it couldn't. Actually since the King is still named Baratheon and not Lannister the Baratheons are still the royal dynasty. He could had done it but no one seems to mention something like that.
  3. That has nothing to do with the op. I sincerely have no idea what you are talking about. First who do you think that gave her that right? She doesn't have that right in feudal society. Even in the books her action are atrocious.
  4. Being the son of a crappy sperm donor would had something to add at Ned's actions to endanger himself and his family in order to save his nephew. One *father* was an arrogant man who abandoned his wife and children at the hands of his lunatic father and hide away because he was a coward and the *other* father had loved, raised and endanger himself for a child that wasn’t even his. The two fathers would had been the polar opposite.
  5. Desirable for whom and why? Personally I am more interested to Winterfell, Starfall and Greywater Watch.
  6. This is sickening! Killing children for their parents crimes is vile. By your logic the death of the Targaryen children was ok because it was a lesson for their parents. Two things; one you don't know if the Starks had killed children and two it isn't the Starks we are talking about but Dany. I am really scary and disgusted about the way you think and your beliefs. To think that someone has the right to kill people just because he has WMD is hineous. That is a lie. She ordered the deaths all the highborn males. Even children. But according to you since their parents didn't had WMD who cares right? That has nothing to do with what I said. Also has nothing to do with what I said. People of Meereen were selling themselves to slavery and she was taking the money they got from them selling themselves and the future money they will get.
  7. She also took money from the people who sold themselves to slavery because she made their lives a living hell. Tell me again when Robert or Nymeria or even Robb used mass murder, children's murder and genocide when they became the rulers?
  8. He however didn't wanted to be warrior in order to be exterminated by fight Robert. He thought that he was tptwp. The fact that he ended up being killed in a battle means that he was right. Robert had fought for a year, from the fact that Rhaegar had never participated in a war and had died in the only battle he fought its much more possible that Robert was wounded before the battle or by someone else. After all he was healthy enough to sent his maester to Barri. I also have relatives that are sailors and their journeys can last even for a year but they never abandoned their families. Rhaegar did. Rhaegar left his wife and children at the house of his lunatic father. If he cared about them he could first sent them to a safe place, Dorne, and then eloping with Lyanna. When exactly Robert eloped with a woman and left his wife and children at the hands of his lunatic father? So being a noble woman makes cheating ok? Because it was cheating, it doesn't matter how many women there were it was cheating.
  9. Utter nonsense. For the Targs or for anyone else in Westeros, polygamy was never illegal, incest was and the Targs didn't cared. That is a thread from a Jon and Stark hater full of other Jon's haters.This however where you can find people who agree and people who disagree without being a hater is much better;
  10. Brandon was at the Riverlands and Ashara, being Elia's handmaiden, at Dragonstone. Jon was younger than Robb. There is no possibility of Jon being born before Robb's birth and Brandon's death. GRRM told us when Jon was born. You are right. There would had been no guards guarding a traitor and Ashara would had flew all the way from Dragonstone. You think that Cat a mother of five, a midwife or a maester hadn't noticed that Jon was several months older than Robb. This is just bs. The laws are clear, if Jon was Brandon's bastard he would had come after Ned's children. No one would had supported him against Robb.
  11. Good for you. Still it has nothing to do with the op.
  12. I know. Brandon died in 282 and Jon in 283. Not only that but there was enough time between Brandon's death and Jon's birth for Robb to be born and still managed to look older than Jon. So between Brandon’s death and Jon’s birth there were more than 9 months. Hence the timeline is: Brandon's death-Ned's and Cat's wedding-Robb's birth-Jon's birth. As for Ashara being Jon’s mother, Jon was born two years after the single meeting between Ashara and Brandon (281) when btw most likely nothing happened.
  13. It's your personal opinion that the Vale storyline will be unimportant and uninteresting. Until the end of the books you cannot know that. Unless you are GRRM. He did for D&D's fanfiction.
  14. Utter bs. I am not questioning anyone because basically I don't care, I am saying that I don't remember, which is neutral. I am really bored at this point and since you can't prove that in all the other wars between two or more regions it was only one family that caused chaos in the whole Westeros you can't prove me wrong. Again the Targs single handedly caused bloodbaths in the whole of Westeros in less than 300 because of they felt like it. That is not the same with smaller conflicts between two regions in thousands of years.