• Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About apovsic

  • Rank
    Landed Knight
  • Birthday 06/18/1991

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location
  • Interests

Recent Profile Visitors

1,050 profile views
  1. Well, that just confirms my point, not yours, doesn't it? He is probably an AVERAGE fighter not VERY BAD. I never said that he is a good fighter. And if you don't know any solid information about someone's skills with arms, it's probably because he is average (so nothing to talk about, if he would be much better/worse it would be probably talked about): And also I really don't see a correlation between focus on law and being a bad fighter? And about training, how many man do we really see that train? Are all of those, who do not train bad fighters? And having man under your command also doesn't give if one is good fighter or not. So really it all based on some really thin assumptions. Really? Like Meagor eh? Also yeah, I agree, but that just mean that he don't attend tourneys, not that he is BAD fighter. Yes, he is probably not very good one, but I really don't know who would claim that. Also, I apologies for off topic, should we continue the debate somewhere elsewhere or should we stop?
  2. Well this isn't really hard evidence. I mean, sure I could buy it if Stannis was some minor character from the books or WOIAF, but he is not. He is one of the major character of the books and one of the most talked about. He is a Baratheon, family known for great fighters and what is more he is brother of a man, who was known for his fighting skills. And yet in all five books there is no mention that Stannis is a bad fighter. There is a lot of talking about him, how he is like what are his cons and prons, a lot of comparing him with Robert and yet no one says something like "And Robert was a great fighter and Stannis is shit!". So therefore I really don't see any solid rock evidence for Stannis being VERY BAD warrior. OTOH I won't claim that he was something special (based on the fact that he was Baratheon or something like that). I think that he was an average warrior, maybe slightly above or bellow. And until there is some good evidence, no one can claim that he is probably good/bad.
  3. This is based on what?
  4. Well, maybe they are called towns, because they are not independent and so this towns can have larger population than some smaller Free cities? That way we could have only two ridiculously large cities instead of ten or more ...