Aemon Stark

  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Everything posted by Aemon Stark

  1. I can't believe I'm only just now getting into a DS9 digression, but I disagree. DS9 did far, far better at introducing and developing its characters, but it also had a 20-episode first season. Even so, none of the overarching ideas amounted to the kinds of wild swings and almost random approach of Disco. And while I did enjoy Disco, the character writing was kinda all over the place, with plots relying far too much on "twists" and science magic than I really care for. I can see it becoming a great show, but they're not there yet by any means. I mean Elim fucking Garak had appeared by the third episode of DS9! In any case, Disco has the potential. They've been taking risks, which I like, but I need to see they can learn from mistakes (e.g. almost everything about the new Klingon design and similarly underwriting them to an extreme - we got way more back in Sins of the Father when we first saw Qonos). This. Captive Pursuit, Dax, The Nagus, Vortex, Battlelines, Progress, The Forsaken, and In the Hands of the Prophets (hello Vedek Winn!) were all pretty solid too. Then we got a three-part season opener next year. I understand why Avery Brooks hated it (I would do if I had to sing "Allamaraine, count to four..."), but I always liked it way back when I first watched it. The first season is kinda slow moving but it's fun enough. The Storyteller isn't super great, but I really love seeing the state of Bashir/O'Brien then when the latter can barely stand the good doctor. There's a great bit scene in (I think) Q-Less where O'Brien listens in silence while Bashir chats up some girl and the look on his face is just... And no one is going to be offended by an evil German goblin man. Re: TNG season one - The fact that anyone kept watching after Code of Honor is more astounding in retrospect than anything else.
  2. I have to watch it again, but I assume Luv got tipped off by some of K's questions when he visited the Wallace HQ.
  3. It kinda depends on a person's background and education level. The MoCA is better at detecting subtler cognitive problems even in educated people, but it is still a very low bar for anyone in a significant occupation let alone POTUS. It assesses executive function to some extent (ahem *judgement* and *decision-making*), but there are better more specific tests like the frontal assessment battery. Either way, Trump certainly seems to display narcissistic and antisocial personality traits. Dementia would mean memory deficits combined with worsening functioning in one or more other cognitive domains. I can't imagine he meets criteria for that, but at the end of the day he's really just a bad person. But then we already knew that much.
  4. I couldn't finish it either. Too much murk and muted dialogue.
  5. Well, decades of underinvestment will give that impression. Newfoundland doesn't have much of any public transit apart from buses in St John's. We once had a railway running all the way across the province, but the feds pulled the plus on it around 1990 with the promise of reinvesting in the Trans-Canada Highway. I suppose it's better than it was then, but passing lanes here and there don't make up for the ruts from the trucks, especially when said lanes are plowed more in theory than in practice in the winter... Anyway, rail is viable when you want it to be viable.
  6. I think you're right. This might be a reflection on a lot of current television, but the sound design generally feels kinda cluttered throughout. I also long for some more straightforward character driven drama... and maybe fewer Klingons. Of course, in TNG terms by episode 10 we were introducing Lwaxana Troi. They also had covered such seminal events as the first appearance of Ferengi and given us both "Code of Honor" and "Justice". DS9 was well into a fairly quiet, introspective first season. I kinda miss that here.
  7. Well, if you assume that history has some sort of end with necessary progress and "phases", perhaps this would be relevant. But such teleologies are human ideas not realities.
  8. But the practice of cultivation does not necessarily imply any particular timeline for the development of large scale agriculture. We can theorize that it required a very particular confluence of circumstances for this to happen, along with a bit of randomness.
  9. Actually the PQ didn't win a majority in either 1976 or 1994 (41% and then 45%). The next step in 1998 was to be a "competent" government so as to create "winning conditions" for another referendum after the near miss of 1995. But in that election the PQ wound up winning fewer votes than the Liberals, despite still getting a majority of seats. I guess the question in Scotland and - eventually - Catalonia is whether there is a potential for "referendum fatigue", where it's considered a vote loser even to mention it. These are the most divisive of divisive political conflicts. At some point the aspirations of "self-determination" for people living in a rich country who are not in any meaningful way oppressed don't quite last. In Quebec, the PQ is currently competing for third place, having gone down the road of identity (read anti-Muslim) politics, while successfully alienating traditional labour allies over many years of, well, alienating them.
  10. I'm going to take issue with the question, as to ask "why" implies that humans at some point made a conscious decision to "create States". The better question is "how" they created them. Another issue is that the sharp distinction being drawn between farmers and hunter-gatherers doesn't quite ring true. Cultivation didn't begin with widespread agriculture, but the people who started growing stuff like wheat and developing irrigation systems were the ones that made it central to food production and civilization.
  11. I haven't always been a fan of Michael Giacchino, but he did a great job with Rogue One last year. Another one to mention is Joel McNeely who did the soundtrack for everyone's favourite N64 Star Wars game - Shadows of the Empire.
  12. Somehow I've never actually seen Legend. But the Goldsmith score is a transcendent masterwork.
  13. This is manifestly untrue. Here in Canada we certainly pay for drugs for rare diseases through a variable mixture of private insurance, compassionate release from the manufacturer, and provincially-funded drug plans (often on case-by-case bases). That doesn't mean there aren't incredible distortions in the pharmaceutical industry, but there's a difference between Soliris - which has only two rare indications for which it doesn't improve mortality - and Rituximab, a mainstay of lymphoma treatment and a safer immune therapy for pulmonary-renal syndromes. I hope eventually that biologics will get cheaper - and they likely will - but I don't think you can attribute escalating health care costs simply to the rare disease treatment phenomenon. In the US, the problem has been and remains a for-profit "competitive" system with gross redundancy awkwardly grafted onto myriad insurance schemes. As it stands, I deal with a single insurer with transparent fee schedules, but our system also provides no more than a patchwork of drug coverage that leaves many people out. I pay $28 per month through my employer for dental coverage and about $35 for other extended health coverage.
  14. A hard question, inasmuch as before LOTR there weren't many good ones. But here's a list: Labyrinth Willow The Neverending Story (my childhood memories of it, definitely not when I rewatched...) Excalibur The Last Unicorn The various lists on Wikipedia or IMDB contain a lot of stuff like Gremlins or Ghostbusters that I don't always think of as "fantasy". Similarly I'd put Miyazaki movies in a category of their own - as my essentially permanent avatar suggests, Nausicaa is one of my favourite movies ever. A propos:
  15. The 80s lied to us... no flying cars, no (actual) hoverboards.
  16. I don't remember her saying anything about being adopted, but she said she went into the bubble at age 8.
  17. I'd certainly heard of Harvey Weinstein, but only insofar as I was familiar with him as "one of those Miramax guys". Couldn't pick him out of a lineup. What bothers me about this whole scandal is that it's obvious everyone knew about this for years and did nothing. And I'm sure he's far from the only one.
  18. I read a review criticizing the film along these lines and was singularly unconvinced. But if you replace Gosling with Blunt I think you just get Sicario.
  19. Saw this a second time yesterday. Probably one of Ford's most detailed and affecting performances in a very long time!
  20. As a point of information, self-sealing stem bolts are used in the manufacture of reverse ratcheting router planers.
  21. Yeah I watched it on Space and I guess I'll continue to do so. Crave actually has a pretty good catalogue; it just has the worst software ever. I get it free following some "negotiations" with Bell. Never say that agreeing to switch to Rogers doesn't have benefits.
  22. The first season (and the first few episodes...) of TNG were fairly awful, though perhaps mitigated by the 1987 aspect. Anyway, I did enjoy this so far, but it definitely hasn't found its legs yet. Pros: Production design is very cool. Cast/characters have potential, though not fully realized. (Even Garak wasn't around for DS9's pilot.) Opening credits happily lack Diane Warren lyrics. Klingons still act like Klingons. Michelle Yeoh would have made a great main/recurring character. Bridge crew, particularly Saru, work for me. The main ideas of the plot work. Cons: Pacing is all over the place. We needed a lot more "show, don't tell" and it would have been more meaningful to spend more time getting to know this ship and crew. Even if this is technically a prequel, it's still "all new". Way too many flashbacks. While they were used extensively in Emissary way back when, they were a whole lot less expository and focused. I did note that they were almost exclusively Burnham's story, which kept it a bit more consistent, but introducing T'Kovawhatever's didn't work. The Klingons' new look is jarring, but seemed way more problematic because they were constantly speaking in Klingon. The few times they spoke in English worked a lot better. I'd happily return to the "universal translator" approach if simply to help the actors. I do hope they soften their appearance somewhat for the same reason. I did feel echoes of the Abrahmsverse in some of the pacing and writing choices. It needs to be closer to the BSG end of this spectrum, if not all the way there. Lighting was off, especially in the final (second episode) scene. "Dark" storytelling should not be literally dark. Sound design was far too cluttered and there was far too much music. Silence (and detailed but unobstrusive foley design) works a lot better for dialogue. Otherwise everything feels too amped up.
  23. I agree this was fairly exposition heavy. All the subtitled Klingon scenes feel a bit impenetrable. Fortunately in Canada they're showing episode two on Space immediately.
  24. I could use a bit more restraint in the sound design - and the Klingons are decent but so many subtitles - but I like this. I just hope it isn't *too* serialized as you can have discrete episodes that still maintain plot/character continuity. Regarding the Klingon death howl.... we actually got it here!
  25. Yes and no. Voyager was generally promoted by UPN as an "action" show and they filled its promos with action scenes and explosions. It's not a well put together trailer, though, as it's too all-over-the-place and the song is really annoying. I reaaaaaallly hope we're not going to have to suffer through another Diane Warren/Rod Stewart debacle like the Enterprise theme song. Ugh. Ugh. Ugh.