Ser Lepus Posted November 20, 2014 Share Posted November 20, 2014 Ships certainly do sail river Rhoyne. How do Dothraki get across Rhoyne? Yandry reports that Shy Maid with her broad beam and shallow draught can negotiate sandbars even in smaller vassal streams of Rhoyne, that would strand larger vessels. Are these sandbars also shallow enough all across Rhoyne that men and horses can wade across Rhoyne with head in air and without feet sinking into soft bottom anywhere? Or do Dothraki have to cross by swimming horses? No way. The Rhoyne seems to be as wide as the Amazon River, a river that big can't be shallow enough for horses to wade it, and it is too wide and its current should be to strong for horses to swim across. It seems that close to the mouth it breaks into many narrower arms that flow between many islands that form a delta, but Volantis itself is built on those islands, so they would have to fight through the strongest defenses in the region. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaak Posted November 20, 2014 Share Posted November 20, 2014 A khalasar that wants to get from Dothraki Sea to Pentos, like Drogo did and many others habitually do, has to cross Qhoyne, Noyne, Rhoyne and Little Rhoyne before reaching Velvet Hills of Pentos. So how do the Dothraki accomplish the river crossings when unopposed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ser Lepus Posted November 20, 2014 Share Posted November 20, 2014 A khalasar that wants to get from Dothraki Sea to Pentos, like Drogo did and many others habitually do, has to cross Qhoyne, Noyne, Rhoyne and Little Rhoyne before reaching Velvet Hills of Pentos. So how do the Dothraki accomplish the river crossings when unopposed? They ride really far north, where the rivers are shallow and narrow enough to be waded or crossed with the help of rafts. Also, the Valyrians probably built bridges were the Dragon Roads cross the Darkwater, the Noyne, the Upper Rhoyne and the Little Rhoyne. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaak Posted November 21, 2014 Share Posted November 21, 2014 Also, the Valyrians probably build bridges were the Dragon Roads cross the Darkwater, the Noyne, the Upper Rhoyne and the Little Rhoyne. So are the Dothraki only able to cross Rhoyne by bridges? There is no crossing at Volantis. The bridge of Volantis is a wonder, but the mouth of Rhoyne splits into 4 channels, so the Volantis bridge only leads to an island between the branches. To reach the west bank of Rhoyne for Volon Therys and Orange Shore would require crossing the other three channels as well. Chroyane Bridge does cross the whole Rhoyne, but is it passable for armies in its present condition? A Valyrian road exists between the ruins of Ar Noy and living city of Qohor, but the road is not shown over the river. Does it mean there is no crossing at Ar Noy, and the only bridge of Qhoyne is in the cty (and inside the fortifications) of Qohor? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AzureOwl Posted November 21, 2014 Share Posted November 21, 2014 A Valyrian road exists between the ruins of Ar Noy and living city of Qohor, but the road is not shown over the river. Does it mean there is no crossing at Ar Noy, and the only bridge of Qhoyne is in the cty (and inside the fortifications) of Qohor? The Dothraki don't need to cross the Qhoyne. The Forest of Qohor is not an impassable obstacle and the river mostly runs from northeast to southwest. The Dothraki just need to cross the Forest north of Qohor,over the headwaters of the Qhoyne and then turn south to follow the Valyrian road over the Darkwater and the Noyne. There's also likely to be a bridge somewhere in Ghoyan Drohe that just didn't need mentioned in the books proper. Really, the Valyrian road that once brought som much wealth to Qohor, Norvos and Pentos when Sarnor still existed, nowadays makes them the most vulnerable of the Free Cities to Dothraki attack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaak Posted November 21, 2014 Share Posted November 21, 2014 The Dothraki don't need to cross the Qhoyne. The Forest of Qohor is not an impassable obstacleNot for an unopposed khalasar, sure. and the river mostly runs from northeast to southwest. The Dothraki just need to cross the Forest north of Qohor,over the headwaters of the Qhoyne and then turn south to follow the Valyrian road over the Darkwater and the Noyne.Over the Noyne again right in the city and fortifications of Norvos. There's also likely to be a bridge somewhere in Ghoyan Drohe that just didn't need mentioned in the books proper.Probably. But the question is, is the Little Rhoyne around Ghoyan Drohe easy to cross away from the bridge? Really, the Valyrian road that once brought som much wealth to Qohor, Norvos and Pentos when Sarnor still existed, nowadays makes them the most vulnerable of the Free Cities to Dothraki attack.Um, Volantis is reached by Demon Road, with no rivers to cross. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AzureOwl Posted November 21, 2014 Share Posted November 21, 2014 One thing I just noticed is that the Valyrian roads featured in the maps are not the only ones. The book mentions that Myr sits at the point where a dragonroad meets the sea, but no such road is featured on the maps. This may imply that the Valyrian road network is more widespread than previously thought, with the possibility of accompanying bridges. Not for an unopposed khalasar, sure. The Dothraki may tend to give Qohor a wide berth and the Qohorik gain nothing by impeding them on their way further west. Over the Noyne again right in the city and fortifications of Norvos. Not necessarily. The book only says that Norvos is on the eastern bank of the Noyne, but not that it's right up to the waterfront. The Known World map even lends credence to the hypothesis that there's some distance between the river and the city. Probably. But the question is, is the Little Rhoyne around Ghoyan Drohe easy to cross away from the bridge? Probably not, But if the Dothraki are already that far, it would be nothing for them to go around the Velvet Hills Um, Volantis is reached by Demon Road, with no rivers to cross. Hence the vulnerability and nervousness in Selhorys, and the need for Volantis to maintain strong armies and defenses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joluoto2 Posted November 21, 2014 Share Posted November 21, 2014 A khalasar that wants to get from Dothraki Sea to Pentos, like Drogo did and many others habitually do, has to cross Qhoyne, Noyne, Rhoyne and Little Rhoyne before reaching Velvet Hills of Pentos. So how do the Dothraki accomplish the river crossings when unopposed? My guess is rafts over a narrow portion of the river. The horses of course swim (which is why it has to be narrow). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaak Posted November 21, 2014 Share Posted November 21, 2014 Compare Trident.Trident IS fordable - that´s what the battle of the Ruby Ford was about. But on the other hand, the Frey bridge matters. Robb cannot just ford the river at any nearby fords, because there aren´t any all the way to Ruby Ford where Tywin is. But neither can he ignore Freys and swim or raft his force over Trident. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wmarshal Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 You know, it just doesn't make sense, they do not siege, and well can't because they live in a huge grass land that goes on for ever, so how exactly can they take these cities? The dothraki we have met spoke of how khals ride away if a foe does not meet them in battle, yet they take the cities still? How? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ser Lepus Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 You know, it just doesn't make sense, they do not siege, and well can't because they live in a huge grass land that goes on for ever, so how exactly can they take these cities? The dothraki we have met spoke of how khals ride away if a foe does not meet them in battle, yet they take the cities still? How? They probably raided an pillaged the countryside so many times that their economy became unsustainable. By the time they assaulted the cities, they probably were half abandoned already. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wmarshal Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 They probably raided an pillaged the countryside so many times that their economy became unsustainable. By the time they assaulted the cities, they probably were half abandoned already. Even if they did that, the cities should have no issue not opening their gates to them. Simply shooting arrows shouldn't give them cities like that, it goes beyond all real logic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheSovereignGrave Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 Even if they did that, the cities should have no issue not opening their gates to them. Simply shooting arrows shouldn't give them cities like that, it goes beyond all real logic. Or the Dothraki just didn't assault cities. They could just raid and pillage the countryside until the ruler has no choice but to either starve to death or try to attack the Dothraki in an actual battle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mithras Posted December 28, 2014 Author Share Posted December 28, 2014 You know, it just doesn't make sense, they do not siege, and well can't because they live in a huge grass land that goes on for ever, so how exactly can they take these cities? The dothraki we have met spoke of how khals ride away if a foe does not meet them in battle, yet they take the cities still? How? It is also said that there are countless remains of sacked cities to show the distaste of Dothraki against structure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mithras Posted December 28, 2014 Author Share Posted December 28, 2014 Or the Dothraki just didn't assault cities. They could just raid and pillage the countryside until the ruler has no choice but to either starve to death or try to attack the Dothraki in an actual battle. They certainly assault cities. They sacked Ib several times. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheSovereignGrave Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 They certainly assault cities. They sacked Ib several times. Oh yeah, forgot about that. Well, I was wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wmarshal Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 It is also said that there are countless remains of sacked cities to show the distaste of Dothraki against structure. This is what makes it confusing, Martin removed the need to siege for the dothraki. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bright Blue Eyes Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 Or the Dothraki just didn't assault cities. They could just raid and pillage the countryside until the ruler has no choice but to either starve to death or try to attack the Dothraki in an actual battle. :agree: Any state can only take raids for so long before they need to face the enemy in open battle or face too much civil unrest. The Fabian Strategy is a risky gamble for any government. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wmarshal Posted December 29, 2014 Share Posted December 29, 2014 :agree: Any state can only take raids for so long before they need to face the enemy in open battle or face too much civil unrest. The Fabian Strategy is a risky gamble for any government. Save the dothraki we have met sated khals just move on, sieging isn't their thing. And the assualts we have read shows them just taking the cities and assaulting the people. It is so annoying, it looks like Martin just coped and pasted the Mongol history. It ignores common need of sieging, need of weapons and armor for it. It is also saying that the mongols didn't need weapons like lances and armor to win their wars, all they needed was a bow! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bright Blue Eyes Posted December 29, 2014 Share Posted December 29, 2014 They don't siege. They don't need to siege. Because they pound the farms and villages and small, unfortified towns until the armies come out of their fortresses. It's a classic chevauchee: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chevauch%C3%A9e Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.