matt b Posted April 26, 2016 Share Posted April 26, 2016 Severian says that if he has a sister, she's a witch. We meet a witch named Ava, which sounds like a reasonable shortening of Severa to me. re:Triskele, I go back and forth on that point. Lately I question whether he was ever really existed at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Richard II Posted April 26, 2016 Share Posted April 26, 2016 I've never had problems reading about un likeable unsympathetic characters. I realize this is an unusual thing with readers. Hell, I think you just hit the nail on the read why some people just can't get into Wolfe. A lot of his characters are giant shitbags. I think there is a plot reason he's so inconsistent though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iskaral Pust Posted April 26, 2016 Share Posted April 26, 2016 1 hour ago, matt b said: Severian says that if he has a sister, she's a witch. We meet a witch named Ava, which sounds like a reasonable shortening of Severa to me. A witch is the default for an orphan girl. I didn't read "she would be a witch" as an absolute statement that she is a witch (he does not know her at this point). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matt b Posted April 27, 2016 Share Posted April 27, 2016 30 minutes ago, Iskaral Pust said: A witch is the default for an orphan girl. I didn't read "she would be a witch" as an absolute statement that she is a witch (he does not know her at this point). It's a very absolute statement. Whether he knows her or not is irrelevant, girls born to those in captivity in the Matachin Tower become witches, boys become torturers. As Severian is a torturer, any hypothetical twin sister would have to be a witch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Richard II Posted April 27, 2016 Share Posted April 27, 2016 I think Borski has something about the sister in his book, which people either tend to agree with completely or find to be heresy. I uh, can;t remember much about it. I should go dig it out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jo498 Posted April 27, 2016 Share Posted April 27, 2016 As far as I remember there is no sister mentioned when Severian's parentage is revealed at the end, so this seems speculation. And it's certainly not the girl in the Atrium of Time. Spoiler I just read that in the sequel "Urth of the new sun" it is told that he later marries Valeria, the girl from the Atrium I also suspected that Triskele was resurrected but there are also reasons (revealed later in book 4) to assume that the dog never was what it appeared to be. Traditional sexism allows (or expects) a hero on a quest to sleep around (within reason). (Recall that Ulysses who is in the end celebrated as "faithfully" returning to Penelope not only slept but lived with Circe and Calypso for an extended period of time... most of his "travels", I think about 7 years is spent with Calypso on her island.) But I think the only clear (and strange) unfaithfulness with respect to Dorcas (and we had his above) is with Jolenta (and this seems more about her than about him). With Cyriaca he has basically already left Dorcas (although this was maybe not completely clear for the reader) and this is even more obvious later with the girl of the Lake people (end of Book 3). If I am not completely mistaken he never did more than kissing with Agia (and this was before he met or paired up with Dorcas). So maybe we should not be too puritan with a ca. 18-19-year-old let loose for the first time... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matt b Posted April 27, 2016 Share Posted April 27, 2016 4 hours ago, Jo498 said: As far as I remember there is no sister mentioned when Severian's parentage is revealed at the end, so this seems speculation. Wolfe is rarely ever as direct as he is when he reveals Severian's parentage. Most everything is speculation, very little is ever directly and literally confirmed. So when you have things that are, like the how children come to the Witches and Matachin Towers, and combine that with the constant reminder of the Severian/Severa twin name connection, it's probably a good rabbit hole to jump down. In my experience with Wolfe, anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jo498 Posted April 27, 2016 Share Posted April 27, 2016 O.k. but this goes both ways. One could also argue that because the parentage is cleared up more thoroughly than almost anything else, a sister would have been mentioned. It does not seem to matter for the narrative, I believe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matt b Posted April 27, 2016 Share Posted April 27, 2016 6 minutes ago, Jo498 said: O.k. but this goes both ways. One could also argue that because the parentage is cleared up more thoroughly than almost anything else, a sister would have been mentioned. Not really though. Ouen didn't even know Catherine was pregnant at all, so he would have no clue. And he's who we get the confirmation from. When Wolfe mentions something more than once, there's usually a reason, and he definitely brings up the Severian/Severa twin names enough to make you go, "hmmmm." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilbur Posted April 29, 2016 Share Posted April 29, 2016 On 4/26/2016 at 3:28 PM, Darth Richard II said: I've never had problems reading about un likeable unsympathetic characters. I realize this is an unusual thing with readers. Hell, I think you just hit the nail on the read why some people just can't get into Wolfe. A lot of his characters are giant shitbags. I think there is a plot reason he's so inconsistent though. I am curious as the plot reason for his inconsistency - would you elaborate a little bit on that subject? Like you, I don't mind unsympathetic characters. The struggle for me with Wolfe is the meandering stories and seemingly irrelevant ornamentation that he uses that (for me) detract from my enjoyment of the story. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Richard II Posted April 29, 2016 Share Posted April 29, 2016 Well, its been a while but Spoiler At the end don't all the previous Autrachs memories get shoved into his head? And there is some sort of weird time loop going on where things can turn out differently. I always assumed some of the inconsistencies had to do with his fucked up memories and different paths of the loop . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilbur Posted May 1, 2016 Share Posted May 1, 2016 On 4/29/2016 at 7:01 PM, Darth Richard II said: Well, its been a while but Hide contents At the end don't all the previous Autrachs memories get shoved into his head? And there is some sort of weird time loop going on where things can turn out differently. I always assumed some of the inconsistencies had to do with his fucked up memories and different paths of the loop . My reading of the character is that he ought to be able to tell a straight story of his own life despite some of the mental renovations, and if he is telling it straight, he lacks a consistent moral code. Come on Fragile Bird, we need you! Just a few chapters... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Richard II Posted May 1, 2016 Share Posted May 1, 2016 Well, he lies a lot. Hence the unreliable narrator thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iskaral Pust Posted May 1, 2016 Share Posted May 1, 2016 1 hour ago, Darth Richard II said: Well, he lies a lot. Hence the unreliable narrator thing. Why does he lie within a single document like this? I can accept an unreliable narrator who uses consistent distortions to appear better, or one who is inconsistent over time. But Severian is writing this entire document within the span of a few days, so his blatant inconsistencies, e.g. whether he had coitus with Thecla, are harder to justify. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Richard II Posted May 1, 2016 Share Posted May 1, 2016 Well, for reasons I said in the spoiler above, I don;t think hes quite sane. But it has been a long time since I read it proper. Kick start my brain, who are the cacogens again? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gasp of Many Reeds Posted May 1, 2016 Share Posted May 1, 2016 5 hours ago, Darth Richard II said: Well, for reasons I said in the spoiler above, I don;t think hes quite sane. But it has been a long time since I read it proper. Kick start my brain, who are the cacogens again? Aliens, possibly intergalactic derivations of the original human stem (the name suggests 'bad/chaotic lineage/bloodline', suggesting they have differentiated significantly from an original lineage). Feared on Urth, appear to be hideous under their masks at Dr Talos' play where some attend, but in their meetings with Severian appear wise and graceful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jo498 Posted May 1, 2016 Share Posted May 1, 2016 The positive name for the aliens is "hierodules" (holy servants). There is an extended meeting with them at the end of Book 3 and more explanations in book 4. Spoiler They seem to be associated with but not identical to the more ancient and powerful alien race that causes the "weak sun" to put mankind on probation. Some humans (the former Autarch and also Severian, no clue if this is true for whatever rulers the Ascians or possible empires on the other continents have) can be called up to them for some test and if they go (they do not have to but in this case the weak sun will continue) and pass the test, the sun regains its strength. The former autarch failed (and therefore was made a eunuch which seems the punishment). Supposedly in the "fifth" volume Urth of the New Sun this testing (and passing) of Severian is described. Severian basically writes the book of the New Sun as a memoir before he goes to try that test. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gasp of Many Reeds Posted May 1, 2016 Share Posted May 1, 2016 Yup, Urth of the New Sun has a lot more exposition on cacogens/hierodules, plus lots of other things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iskaral Pust Posted May 1, 2016 Share Posted May 1, 2016 Although the book offers the translation of "holy servant" for hierodule, a more literal historical translation is a slave or prostitute dedicated to serve a temple, which is a slightly darker interpretation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jo498 Posted May 2, 2016 Share Posted May 2, 2016 It might be that those historically called hierodules were (often or also) temple prostitutes but the *literal* translation is simply holy servant or holy slave or servant of the holy. Cf. the name Theodul(os) that means servant of god. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.