Jump to content

Which historical figure would joffrey go onto resemble the most if he survived?


Marcus corvinus

Recommended Posts

He would probably be somewhat similar to Peter of Castille, who is remembered by some chroniclers as being a nasty monster ("Peter the Cruel"), but is remembered fondly by his allies ("Peter the Just"). It's fairy plausible his reign would also be like Peter of Castille's in several other ways - kids by a bunch of different women he maybe got bored with and abandoned one after the other or who maybe he had killed, maybe briefly overthrown and then reinstated by various factions, maybe ending up mostly by accident on the right side of some sort of big historical problem - like maybe he eventually would have had Gregor Clegane executed or opposed a purge of Free Cities natives in King's Landing by the Faith because it pissed him off, and maybe he would also have kinslayed his own brothers or cousins and eventually been murdered by one of his own family as well. He probably would have been at war fairly constantly, and domestic policy would probably large depend on his mother and later his advisors, whom he would periodically throw under the bus. I mean, all guesses, but reasonable ones.

But I don't think Joffrey quite has the stones to be a true historical monster. He's too petty not smart enough - his advisors would keep him somewhat in check, at least from an external perspective.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, John Doe said:

Vlad doesn't deserve to be on here. 

its true, vlad was cunning and able. He did defeat the ottomans more than once and succeeded in defending romania from the far superior ottomans until mathias corvinus betrayed him. But vlad was notorious for his sadism and cruelty.

Now that i think of it, Vlad could considered an amalgamation of Roose bolton and ramsay bolton. He had roose's cunning, diplomacy and subtlety combined with ramsay's bestial sadism and daredevil courage

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, theblackdragonI said:

Emperor Nero of Rome. Insane, paranoid, delusional, cruel, powerful.

The Suetonian depiction of Nero best suits by Aerys II, with Rhaegar taking the more positive side to/interpretation of Nero's personality. Caligula would be a better fit for Joffrey, the only early Roman emperor who had few redeeming features.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Horse of Kent said:

The Suetonian depiction of Nero best suits by Aerys II, with Rhaegar taking the more positive side to/interpretation of Nero's personality. Caligula would be a better fit for Joffrey, the only early Roman emperor who had few redeeming features.

he was a good general

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Horse of Kent said:

Who? Caligula? Not really, he bottled the only military campaign he came close to fighting.

well the army did love him. He was called germanicus. And the roman army admired merit and manly, charismatic leadership. Mind you rome never did have hereditary monarchy, soldiers and public weren't oathbound to cheer and admire you like in feudal monarchies. The roman empire was essentially a meritocratic military dictatorship; if you were a sloth you'd be laughed at by the urban public and mocked and ridiculed by the army

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Marcus corvinus said:

well the army did love him. He was called germanicus. And the roman army admired merit and manly, charismatic leadership. Mind you rome never did have hereditary monarchy, soldiers and public weren't oathbound to cheer and admire you like in feudal monarchies. The roman empire was essentially a meritocratic military dictatorship; if you were a sloth you'd be laughed at by the urban public and mocked and ridiculed by the army

There is a difference between being loved by the army and a good general. They initially liked him more for who his father was than any accomplishment of his own, and it was from him that he inherited the moniker Germanicus. That was also why Caligula was initially popular as emperor - for Germanicus was always better loved than Tiberius, with both the army and the people - though that did him little good in the end. But once his malignancy and incompetence became apparent, only a matter of years after his accession, pretty much everyone turned against him. As you rightly said, Rome could be ruthless to those it had no faith in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On August 29, 2016 at 0:40 PM, Marcus corvinus said:

Joffrey is cruel and insane even as a child. Its similar to many real life rulers. Which ruler do you think he would emulate most?

1. Ivan the terrible

2. Vlad Dracula

3. Caliluga

 

Not Vlad, he shouldn't be on the list. Their stories are quite incompatible, Vlad was a hard but fair man, a hero to some, respected by many, and feared by all. That's not Joff, in any respect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Marcus corvinus said:

his sadism was legendary

His "sadism" was tactical and necessary, and it's worst aspects were grossly inflated by the German woodcuts depicting such, inspired by the boyars that he kicked out of Wallachia. And I did say kicked out, not killed, so not so sadistic as all that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...