Ser Scot A Ellison Posted November 15, 2016 Share Posted November 15, 2016 4 minutes ago, The Killer Snark said: A number of arrested protestors have admitted it. There are videos on this including caught in the action footage all over Youtube. Soros was hacked recently and what was already known by very easy supposition was verified, by proof preparation for this via his Open Society Foundation. A vast number of the protestors, who we also know have been handed out instructions for conduct, have been photographed coming in on busses owned by the Open Society Foundation. Soros is the main funder and runner of Blaxk Lives Matter, who have been conducting manifold hate crimes in the riots against whites. Wikileaks disclosed a Craigslist ad that proves Soros was recruiting these animals as a default in case Hillary did not get in months before the election result. Do you have a link that supports this assertion from a non- "Alt-right" source? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Killer Snark Posted November 15, 2016 Share Posted November 15, 2016 3 minutes ago, Ser Scot A Ellison said: Do you have a link that supports this assertion from a non- "Alt-right" source? It's common knowledge. You can do research on it anywhere. There's proof of all of this not just in Wikileaks also but in the recent hack of Soros' personal database. Plus there's footage all over Youtube and Photographs proving this as well. There's even an undercover video of one of the rioters asmitting they were paid 320 dollars for it. You realise there is a very good reason why Asia, half of Europe and Russia wants this very evil individual dead? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aceluby Posted November 15, 2016 Share Posted November 15, 2016 Just now, The Killer Snark said: It's common knowledge. You can do research on it anywhere. There's proof of all of this not just in Wikileaks also but in the recent hack of Soros' personal database. You realise there is a very good reason why Asia, half of Europe and Russia wants him dead. So.... is that a no? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ser Scot A Ellison Posted November 15, 2016 Share Posted November 15, 2016 4 minutes ago, The Killer Snark said: It's common knowledge. You can do research on it anywhere. There's proof of all of this not just in Wikileaks also but in the recent hack of Soros' personal database. You realise there is a very good reason why Asia, half of Europe and Russia wants him dead. If it is "common knowledge" it shouldn't be hard to come up with an non-Alt-right source for the assertion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Killer Snark Posted November 15, 2016 Share Posted November 15, 2016 1 minute ago, Ser Scot A Ellison said: If it is "common knowledge" it shouldn't be hard to come up with an non-Alt-right source for the assertion. I already told you. The proof is all over the Internet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weeping Sore Posted November 15, 2016 Share Posted November 15, 2016 1 minute ago, Ser Scot A Ellison said: If it is "common knowledge" it shouldn't be hard to come up with an non-Alt-right source for the assertion. Since an anagram of George Soros is "Ogres go sore" that proves he's behind BLM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ser Scot A Ellison Posted November 15, 2016 Share Posted November 15, 2016 4 minutes ago, The Killer Snark said: I already told you. The proof is all over the Internet. So, support your assertion. Bring us the information. You are making a claim, provide support for that claim. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fez Posted November 15, 2016 Share Posted November 15, 2016 At this rate there might not even be a Trump administration before the midterms; but rather a rump Obama administration stuck in limbo basically keeping the lights running. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ser Scot A Ellison Posted November 15, 2016 Share Posted November 15, 2016 4 minutes ago, Fez said: At this rate there might not even be a Trump administration before the midterms; but rather a rump Obama administration stuck in limbo basically keeping the lights running. What's this? Why is the agreement necessary for the transition? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Chatywin et al. Posted November 15, 2016 Share Posted November 15, 2016 20 minutes ago, Roose Boltons Pet Leech said: I'm now imagining 2020: a 74 year old Trump vs a 79 year old Sanders. "Old Man Yells At Cloud" might be an accurate summary. I wouldn't assume that Trump runs again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aceluby Posted November 15, 2016 Share Posted November 15, 2016 1 minute ago, Fez said: At this rate there might not even be a Trump administration before the midterms; but rather a rump Obama administration stuck in limbo basically keeping the lights running. They have absolutely no idea what they are doing. Remember when Republicans argued that Obama couldn't do the job because he had no experience? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frog Eater Posted November 15, 2016 Share Posted November 15, 2016 2 minutes ago, Ser Scot A Ellison said: If it is "common knowledge" it shouldn't be hard to come up with an non-Alt-right source for the assertion. http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/11/heres-proof-soros-money-funding-anti-trump-leftist-protest-riots/ there are lots of others Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mlle. Zabzie Posted November 15, 2016 Share Posted November 15, 2016 2 minutes ago, Frog Eater said: http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/11/heres-proof-soros-money-funding-anti-trump-leftist-protest-riots/ there are lots of others I'm not sure that counts. http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/The_Gateway_Pundit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frog Eater Posted November 15, 2016 Share Posted November 15, 2016 1 minute ago, aceluby said: They have absolutely no idea what they are doing. Remember when Republicans argued that Obama couldn't do the job because he had no experience? But there are still lots of people around who ran W's Administration. Bring in a few as "consultants" and get this shit show straight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frog Eater Posted November 15, 2016 Share Posted November 15, 2016 Just now, Mlle. Zabzie said: I'm not sure that counts. http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/The_Gateway_Pundit I just googled "Soros paid Anti Trump Protest" to see what would come up. Its no less partisan than the mother jones links posted here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fez Posted November 15, 2016 Share Posted November 15, 2016 Just now, Ser Scot A Ellison said: What's this? Why is the agreement necessary for the transition? Because the transition team has no legal authority on its own. They can't just view classified materials, hire executive branch staff, wander around the executive office buildings, etc. After Trump is inaugurated he has legal authority, and he can hire people for specific positions that have legal authority, but that doesn't happen until January 20 and doesn't happen in a day. Just now, Frog Eater said: But there are still lots of people around who ran W's Administration. Bring in a few as "consultants" and get this shit show straight. There are, and some were. Most of them have already left; and at least a few are being pretty vocal about discouraging anyone else from coming in. He worked for Rice at State from 2007 until Bush left office. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mlle. Zabzie Posted November 15, 2016 Share Posted November 15, 2016 2 minutes ago, Frog Eater said: I just googled "Soros paid Anti Trump Protest" to see what would come up. Its no less partisan than the mother jones links posted here. I'm not holding out Mother Jones as a bastion of impartial journalism - never have. However, the question was to find a non-alt-right source. I don't think that particular source qualifies. A quick perusal of their articles doesn't give me a whole heck of a lot of confidence in its journalistic integrity (which I care about more than its bias). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ser Scot A Ellison Posted November 15, 2016 Share Posted November 15, 2016 18 minutes ago, The Killer Snark said: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weeping Sore Posted November 15, 2016 Share Posted November 15, 2016 6 minutes ago, Frog Eater said: Its no less partisan than the mother jones links posted here. Mother Jones is a leftist magazine that has been around since 1976. It definitely uses a liberal-radical lens but it uses that lens to look at actual facts, not made-up fever dreams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ser Scot A Ellison Posted November 15, 2016 Share Posted November 15, 2016 9 minutes ago, Fez said: Because the transition team has no legal authority on its own. They can't just view classified materials, hire executive branch staff, wander around the executive office buildings, etc. After Trump is inaugurated he has legal authority, and he can hire people for specific positions that have legal authority, but that doesn't happen until January 20 and doesn't happen in a day. There are, and some were. Most of them have already left; and at least a few are being pretty vocal about discouraging anyone else from coming in. He worked for Rice at State from 2007 until Bush left office. Interesting. I hadn't thought about that aspect. An agreement is necessary in this circumstance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.